VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Uttarakhand High Court 2026 › High Court of Uttarakhand

Azeem v. State of Uttarakhand

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Uttarakhand
Decided
20 July 2026
Bench
Alok Mahraauthor
Case no.
ABA 480/2023

Follow Uttarakhand High CourtFollow Alok Mahra

Judgment

UKHC010096632023

2026:UHC:6065 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar's order with Signatures COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS

ABA/480/2023 Azeem and Another --Applicants Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicants.

Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

¶2By means of the present application, the applicants seek the grant of anticipatory bail in connection with F.I.R. No. 0353 of 2023, registered at Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar, for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 5 and 11 of the Uttarakhand Prevention of Cow Progeny Act, 2007.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 26.06.2023, granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicants and, in compliance with the conditions stipulated therein, the applicants have duly cooperated with the investigation as and when called upon by the Investigating Officer.

¶4Learned State Counsel submits that the investigation has since been concluded and the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicants further contends that no material has been brought on record by the prosecution to demonstrate that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is either necessary or warranted at this stage. It is, therefore, prayed that the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicants be confirmed and made absolute.

¶6Having heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the material available on record, and considered the rival submissions, UKHC010096632023

2026:UHC:6065 this Court finds that the applicants have remained protected by virtue of the interim order dated 26.06.2023 and have duly complied with the conditions incorporated therein by extending full cooperation during the course of the investigation. The investigation has culminated in the submission of the charge-sheet before the competent Court. No material has been placed before this Court to indicate that the applicants have misused the liberty granted to them or have failed to cooperate with the investigating agency. It is also not the case of the prosecution that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is required at this stage. Having regard to the nature of the allegations, the stage of the proceedings, the conduct of the applicants during the period of interim protection, and the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the prosecution case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the applicants have made out a fit case for confirmation of the interim anticipatory bail granted earlier.

¶7Consequently, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicants vide order dated

26.06.2023 is hereby confirmed and made absolute. The applicants shall remain on anticipatory bail on the same terms and conditions as contained in the aforesaid order and shall continue to cooperate with the trial proceedings. It shall also be open to the learned trial Court to impose such further conditions, if considered necessary, in accordance with law.

¶8Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application stands allowed.

(Alok Mahra, J.)

20.07.2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,

2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa 08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF 0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.20 18:49:08 +05'30'

Source: High Court of Uttarakhand, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.