Dr Ramesh Singh v. The Secretary Higher Education Department

HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON'BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 0 4 TH DECEMBER, 2 0 2 5 W RI T PETI TI ON ( S/ B) NO. 1 36 OF 2 0 2 5 Dr. Ramesh Singh

…...Petitioner. Ver su s State of Uttarakhand & others …….Respondents. W it h W RI T PETI TI ON ( S/ B) NO. 1 61 OF 2 0 2 5 Dr. Ramesh Singh & another

…...Petitioners. Ver su s The State of Uttarakhand & others …….Respondents. W it h W RI T PETI TI ON ( S/ B) NO. 3 83 OF 2 0 2 5 Dr. Ramesh Singh

…...Petitioner. Ver su s The Secretary Higher Education Department & others …….Respondents.

Counsel for the Petitioners : Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel. Counsel for the State : Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.

Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, learned counsel. Counsel for Respondent No.5 in WPSB No.136 of 2025 : Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel. Counsel for Respondent No.6 in WPSB No.136 of 2025 : Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Tarun Lakhera, learned counsel. Counsel for Respondent No.5 in WPSB No.161 of 2025 : Mr. K.P. Upadhyaya, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Mukesh Kaparuwan, learned counsel.

COMMON JUDGMENT :(per Mr . G. Nar en dar , C.J.)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners,

Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for respondent no.5 and the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

2.

It is submitted by the learned counsels that the Director, Higher Education, Mr. Prof. V.N. Khali, pursuant to our order dated 31.10.2025, has conducted the physical inspection of the Government Post Graduate College, Uttarkashi on 08.11.2025 and has interacted with the Professors, staff and students and has brought about peace amongst the staff and the students and addressed misgivings; that it is submitted that post the visit of Director, Higher Education, peace has reigned in the Institution and the staff and the students have assured that there would not be repetition of the past events, and; that all the orders passed against the petitioner and his wife have been withdrawn.

3.

In that view, it is prayed that the writ petitions be disposed of.

4.

The submission of the respective counsels is placed on record.

5.

The writ petitions stand disposed of.

6.

There shall be no order as to costs.

7.

As a sequel thereto, pending application, if any, shall stand closed.

_ _ _ __ _ _ G. NARENDAR, C.J.

_ _ _ __ _ _ _

SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dated: 04th December, 2025 NI SHANT NISHANT KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,

2.5.4.20=ad3fcb5ca64340f5ddtia4c574afatifd63133605ca57cdcti 0ec2b7462b452b326, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=7E81318F3B1BE7EAAC9370185F7C9C20892BC63 A055CFD1961690560487E670C, cn=NISHANT KUMAR Date: 2025.12.11 18:09:05 +05'30'