Service Law
39 judgments tagged with this keyword in the official report. Filter or search within these · Subject index
-
Ashok Kumar Dabas (Dead Through Legal Heirs) v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The High Court has upheld the orders passed by the Tribunal by which the claim of the predecessors-in-interest of the appellant, for release of the pensionary benefits of the deceased employee, was declined.
-
State Bank of India & Others v. Ramadhar Sao
The respondent was removed from services. The order of punishment was set aside by the Single Bench of the High Court and the respondent was directed to be reinstated with back wages. By the impugned judgment intra-court appeal…
-
Ch. Joseph v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation & Other
i) Whether the retirement of the appellant on medical grounds due to colour blindness, without offering alternative employment, is legally sustainable in light of applicable service regulations and binding settlements; ii)…
-
Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India & Ors.
The High Court upheld reduction of one-third of the pension payable to the appellant under the Central Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995.
-
Mandeep Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
The matter pertains to legality of recruitment/selection of Assistant Professors and Librarians in Government Degree colleges of Punjab. The Division Bench of the High Court has reversed the findings of the Single Judge and has…
-
The Reserve Bank of India v. M.T. Mani and Another
RBI issued Administration Circular No.1 on 14.09.2020 opening a last option for the serving and retiring employees to switch over to pension scheme from CPF scheme. Whether the fixing of the cut off date i.e. 01.07.2020 for grant…
-
S. Janaki Iyer v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether the impugned orders sustaining dismissal of the appellant from the service requires interference; whether there was any violation of statutory rules; whether there was violation of principles of natural justice; whether,…
-
Durga Prasad v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Matter pertains to initiation of inquiry against the appellant (Inspector of Police at the time of riots) on account of dereliction of duty in controlling the 1984 riots. Whether, in the facts of the case, the High Court ought to…
-
UCO Bank & Anr. v. Vijay Kumar Handa
The appellant-Bank dismissed the respondent from the services. Whether the respondent was entitled to receive the terminal benefits for the period of service he had rendered.
-
Yogesh Kumar v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Whether the High Court was justified in non-suiting the appellant and others on the ground that an appropriate civil action would mean the proceedings only before a Civil Court and not Writ Court.
-
State of Assam & Ors. v. Arabinda Rabha & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in its interference with the decision made by the Government to cancel the select list; Whether the decision of the appellants to cancel the select list was either vulnerable on application of…
-
Sajid Khan v. L Rahmathullah & Ors.
Whether the appellants' qualifications for the post in question meet the standard prescribed in the recruitment notification.
-
K. Samba Moorthy v. Sanjiv Chadha & Ors.
Whether respondents should have granted the benefit of promotion from MMG/Scale-II to MMG/Scale-III with effect from 28.07.2001 with all monetary benefits to the appellant.
-
Jaggo v. Union of India & Ors.
Issue arose as regards the regularization of services of long term serving employees performing essential function in government establishment.
-
Allahabad University Etc. v. Geetanjali Tiwari (Pandey) & Ors. Etc. Etc.
Whether the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in reading down Reg.10(f)(iii) of the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and…
-
Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors. v. Rajasthan High Court & Ors.
(a) When the recruitment process commences and comes to an end; (b) Basis of the doctrine that ‘rules of the game’ must not be changed during the course of the game, or after the game is played; (c) Whether the decision in K.…
-
Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar and Others
Despite the preparation of the Final Select List which signals the conclusion of the appointment process, the State Government sought to scrap the entire process and undertake a fresh appointment process under the New Rules.…
-
V. Vincent Velankanni v. The Union of India and Others
Whether the seniority of the appellant is to be reckoned from the date of induction/initial appointment or as per the date of promotion/ confirmation in the skilled grade.
-
Union of India & Ors. v. Lt. Col. Rahul Arora
Legality of the appointment of Judge Advocate who was admittedly junior to the respondent.
-
Maitreyee Chakraborty v. The Tripura University & Ors.
An offer of appointment was made offering the Appellant the post of Assistant Professor in Law (UR) against lien vacancy. Whether the Respondent-University was justified in resolving on 13.12.2018 at the 32nd Meeting in Agenda…
-
Swati Priyadarshini v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
An Order dated 30.03.2013 passed by the Respondent No.4 deciding not to extend the contract of the appellant as Assistant Project Coordinator from 31.03.2013 on the ground of dereliction of duty, as the work/performance of the…
-
Maheshkumar Chandulal Patel & Anr. v. The State of Gujarat & Ors.
Applicability of the Rule of Stepping up of pay of a Government employee on the basis of the pay of his junior.
-
Jagdish Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar and Others
The Accountant General, State of Bihar, raised an objection dated 28.01.2003, regarding the promotion accorded to the appellant on 10.03.1991 with a further remark that the promotion given to the appellant on 10.03.1991 would…
-
Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner, Through Its Registrar v. Dr. Zabar Singh Solanki and Ors.
In the Civil Appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions (Civil) No. 22278/2011 and 22813/2011, the respondents herein are the Research Assistants, who were designated as Lecturers and later re-designated as Assistant Professors…
-
Union of India & Ors. Etc. v. Prohlad Guha Etc.
Respondent-employees were appointed on compassionate ground. The authority found that their appointments were based on forged/ fabricated and bogus documents and their services were terminated. The issue which arises for…
-
U.P. Roadways Retired Officials and Officers Association v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Whether the appellants who were the former employees of Uttar Pradesh Roadways, a temporary department of the State Government, held any pensionable post before or after their absorption in the U.P. State Roadways Transport…
-
State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. v. Virendra Bahadur Katheria and Ors.
If there was any discrepancy in the pay scales of Sub-Deputy Inspectors of Schools/Assistant Basic Shiksha Adhikaris (SDI/ ABSA) and Deputy Basic Shiksha Adhikaris (DBSA) of the Basic Education Department, State of Uttar Pradesh…
-
Bank of India & Ors. v. Pankaj Srivastava
Whether there is relevant material on record that could be construed as contemplation of the disciplinary proceedings against the deceased employee which would prima facie result in award of major penalty, and thereby bar the…
-
Sant Bhagwan Baba Shikshan Mandal & Ors. v. Gunwant & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent no.1 and appointing him to the post of Shikshan Sevak in the appellant no.3-school.
-
The General Manager, M/S Barsua Iron Ore Mines v. The Vice President United Mines Mazdoor Union and Ors.
Respondent initially declared his date of birth as 27.12.1948. Later, in descriptive roll, he changed his initially recorded date of birth i.e. 27.12.1948 to 12.03.1955. Based on his declaration at the time of initial employment…
-
Sri Pubi Lombi v. The State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors.
In absence of plea of malafide and no averment regarding violation of statutory provision taken by the private respondent before the High Court, whether the interference made by the Division Bench of the High Court in setting…
-
Smt. Vidya K. & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Whether a notification for filling up 18 posts of lecturers of Home Science in First Grade College run by State of Karnataka is liable to be quashed for not providing the breakup of the ‘subjects’ within Home Science.
-
Ravindra Kumar v. State of U.P. & ORS.
There was a non-disclosure of a criminal case (in which the candidate was acquitted) in the verification form of the employment. The State cancelled the selection of the appellant. Was the State justified in cancelling the…
-
Manoj Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The appellant sought appointment as a primary school teacher. The issue arising for consideration in the present case relates the allocation of marks for additional qualifications, for which 10 marks had been prescribed.
-
No.2809759H Ex-Recruit Babanna Machched v. Union of India and Ors.
The appellants were dismissed/discharged from service on the ground that at the time of their enrollment in the Army through Maratha Light Infantry Regimental Centre under the Unit Headquarters Quota in December, 2009 they had…
-
Vinod Kumar & Ors. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Tribunal’s judgment negated the appellants’ plea for regularization and absorption into the posts of ‘Accounts Clerk’ against which they were temporarily appointed. The High Court upheld the order of the Tribunal.
-
Priyanka Prakash Kulkarni v. Maharashtra Public
Appellant was not able to take benefit of female reservation on account of her inability to produce a valid Non-Creamy Layer (NCL) certificate on the last date of submission of the application form. Later, a corrigendum enabled…
-
Radhey Shyam Yadav & Anr. Etc. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Three appellants herein were appointed as Assistant Teachers at the Junior High School on 25.06.1999. From October, 2005, abruptly their salaries were stopped. Whether the State was justified in abruptly stopping their salary.
-
Vashist Narayan Kumar v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
Whether an error committed in the application form, which was uploaded is a material error or a trivial error and was the State justified in declaring the appellant as having failed on account of the same.