Subsequent purchasers
8 judgments tagged with this keyword in the official report. Filter or search within these · Subject index
-
K.S. Manjunath and Others v. Moorasavirappa @ Muttanna Chennappa
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment whereby it allowed the appeals filed by the vendees and set aside the decree passed by the Trial Court, while granting the relief of specific performance…
-
Rohan Vijay Nahar & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Matter pertains to sustainability of the order passed by the High Court in batch of writ petitions wherein the landholders questioned the legality of revenue annotations and mutation entries that described their lands as affected…
-
Smt. Shaifali Gupta v. Smt. Vidya Devi Gupta & Ors.
Issue arose as to the correctness of the order passed by the court of first instance as well as the High Court rejecting the application u/Ord.VII r.11 CPC; and whether the property in respect of which the suit, claim or action…
-
State of Haryana & Others v. Aalamgir & Others
The present appeals assail the orders passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in several writ petitions in respect of acquisition of various parcels of land from time to time by issuance of notifications u/ss.4 and 6 of the…
-
Birma Devi & Ors. v. Subhash & Anr.
Whether the relief of possession may be granted by the executing court in a case where the suit has been decreed for specific performance simpliciter and no express relief for the transfer of possession of the suit property has…
-
Manjit Singh & Anr. v. Darshana Devi & Ors.
High Court held that the appellants-subsequent purchasers could not be said to be bona fide purchasers in accordance with Section 19 (b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and decreed the suit of the plaintiff granting specific…
-
New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Darshan Lal Bohra & Ors.
(i) Whether the respondents-landowners forestalled their right to challenge the acquisition proceeding on the ground of non-compliance of Section 5A, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 because they have not filed objections; or they were…
-
Maharaj Singh & Ors. v. Karan Singh (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
Can the contention that the suit agreement was sham and bogus and not intended to be acted upon be allowed to be raised notwithstanding Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act; Was the suit agreement sham and bogus and not…