Will
12 judgments tagged with this keyword in the official report. Filter or search within these · Subject index
-
C.P. Francis v. C.P. Joseph and Others
Whether the High Court, while invoking the Proviso to s.100(5), CPC, was correct in referring to and applying s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925; whether s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925 is attracted to determine the succession…
-
Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Suresh Chand and Anr.
I) Whether the impugned documents, i.e., Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Receipt of Consideration and the registered Will, allegedly entered into by K, father of the appellant/ defendant no.1 and respondent…
-
Metpalli Lasum Bai (Since Dead) and Others v. Metapalli Muthaih (D) by Lrs.
Whether the High Court, manifestly erred while interfering with the well-reasoned judgment of the trial Court and substituting its own findings by reducing the share of plaintiff-LB in the suit schedule properties; whether the…
-
Gurdial Singh (Dead) Through LR v. Jagir Kaur (Dead) and Anr. Etc.
Issue arose as to whether the High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of the courts below and holding the Will was vitiated due to existence of suspicious circumstances, non-mention of the existence of wife…
-
Rajeev Gupta & Ors. v. Prashant Garg & Ors.
Issue arose whether the suit was barred by limitation; whether the sale deeds were void documents; whether the Will stood admitted in the previous suits and was no longer required to be proved; whether the First Appellate Court…
-
M/s J N Real Estate v. Shailendra Pradhan & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order passed by the Trial Court impleading the appellant as one of the defendants in the suit instituted by the original plaintiff for specific performance of the…
-
Biswajyoti Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
Whether the allegations against the appellant, as they stand, constitute an offence, u/ss.376(2)(f), 417 and 506 IPC; and whether the case of the appellant is fit for discharge u/s.227 CrPC, 1973.
-
J. Ganapatha and Others v. M/S N. Selvarajalou Chetty Trust Rep. by Its Trustees and Others
Whether the Plaint Schedule stood transferred in favour of one late PC through legal, valid and binding documents; Whether appellant is justified in contending that moulding of relief by the impugned judgment is illegal.
-
N.P. Saseendran v. N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.
The question to be decided herein is twin fold, whether the document of the year 1985 is a gift or Settlement or Will and whether the requirements under law or conditions in the deed have been satisfied to vest a legal right.
-
Gopal Krishan & Ors. v. Daulat Ram & Ors.
Impugned in this appeal is the judgment and order of the High Court dated 26.03.2018 whereby it has been held that the Will, subject matter of controversy, allegedly of one Testator-SR, had not been proved, thereby finding that…
-
Lehna Singh (D) By Lrs. v. Gurnam Singh (D) By Lrs. & Ors.
Issue arose whether the questions of law are not required to be framed in second appeal before Punjab and Haryana High Court whose jurisdiction in second appeal is circumscribed by provision of s.41 of the Punjab Act.
-
Thangam and Another v. Navamani Ammal
Genuineness of the Will, a registered document, executed by testator (husband of appellant no.1 and father of appellant no.2) in favour of respondent-plaintiff (daughter of his brother).