Arms Act, 1959 · Chapter II: Acquisition, Possession, Manufacture, Sale, Import, Export and Transport of Arms and Ammunition
Section 3: Licence for acquisition and possession of firearms and ammunition
[(1)] No person shall acquire, have in his possession, or carry any firearm or ammunition unless he holds in this behalf a licence issued in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder:
Provided that a person may, without himself holding a licence, carry any firearm or ammunition in the presence, or under the written authority, of the holder of the licence for repair or for renewal of the licence or for use by such holder.
[(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no person, other than a person referred to in sub-section (3), shall acquire, have in his possession or carry, at any time, more than [two firearm]:
Provided that a person who has in his possession more firearms than three at the commencement of the Arms (Amendment) Act, 1983 (25 of 1983), may retain with him any three of such firearms and shall deposit, within ninety days from such commencement, the remaining firearms with the officer in charge of the nearest police station or, subject to the conditions prescribed for the purposes of sub-section (1) of section 21, with a licensed dealer or, where such person is a member of the armed forces of the Union, in a unit armoury referred to in that sub-section.
[Provided that a person who has in his possession more firearms than two at the commencement of the Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019, may retain with him any two of such firearm and shall deposit, within one year from such commencement, the remaining firearm with the officer in charge of the nearest police station or, subject to the conditions prescribed for the purposes of sub-section (1) of section 21, with a licensed dealer or, where such person is a member of the armed forces of the Union, in a unit armoury referred to in that sub-section after which it shall be delicensed within ninety days from the date of expiry of aforesaid one year:
Provided further that while granting arms licence on inheritance or heirloom basis, the limit of two firearms shall not be exceeded.]
(3) Nothing contained in sub-section (2) shall apply to any dealer in firearms or to any member of a rifle club or rifle association licensed or recognised by the Central Government using a point 22 bore rifle or an air rifle for target practice.
(4) The provisions of sub-sections (2) to (6) (both inclusive) of section 21 shall apply in relation to any deposit of firearms under the proviso to sub-section (2) as they apply in relation to the deposit of any arm or ammunition under sub-section (1) of that section.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 3
-
S.K. Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the tribunal substituting the conviction of the appellant u/s.63 of the Army Act for possession of ammunition without license and held him guilty u/s.63, an act…
-
Jamnalal v. State of Rajasthan and Another
In the instant appeal, the father of the prosecutrix challenges the order of the High Court. By the said order, the sentence imposed on respondent no.2 herein was suspended till the final disposal of the appeal. Whether…
-
Chetan v. The State of Karnataka
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the courts below convicting and sentencing the appellant u/ss.302, 304 IPC, and u/ss.3, 5 of the Arms Act, 1959.
-
State (CBI) v. Mohd. Salim Zargar @ Fayaz & Ors.
Issue arose as regards the correctness of judgment and order of the Special Court acquitting the respondents for offences under Ranbir Penal Code, 1932 and Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987.
-
Thammaraya and Another v. The State of Karnataka
Whether the conviction of the appellants-accused under Sections 201 and 302 read with Section 34, Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable.
-
Ayub Khan v. The State of Rajasthan
Adverse observations were made against the appellant, a District and Sessions Judge of Rajasthan Judicial Service by the Rajasthan High Court. High Court observed that while rejecting the bail application, the appellant…
- Prem Singh Sehrawat v. State (Nct of Delhi)
-
Ajwar v. Waseem and Another
High Court, if justified in exercising jurisdiction u/s. 439(1) Cr.P.C for granting regular bail in favour of the accused persons.
- Kamta Prasad Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Smt Maya Devi v. State
- Adv. Shiv Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
- Meet Malhotra v. Union of India Through Secretary & Ors
- The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Phool Singh
- Abhishek v. State of Maharashtra & Ors
- Deepak Yadav v. State of U.P. & Anr
- Jagjeet Singh & Ors v. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr.
- Vasudev v. State of M.P.
- Bhoopendra Singh v. The State of Rajasthan
- Kavitha Lankesh v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Sudha Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- Fakhrey Alam v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Asim Shariff v. National Investigation Agency
- Rajan v. The Home Secretary, Home Department of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
- Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra
- Surajsinh Alias Sonu Surajsinh Collectorsinh Alias Sevaram Rajput v. State of Gujarat
- State of Rajasthan v. Ram Kailash Alias Ram Vilas
- State of Rajasthan v. Manoj Kumar
- The State of Maharashtra v. Vishwanath Maranna Shetty
- State of Rajasthan v. Arjun Singh & Ors. Etc
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Amit Singh v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Talevar & Anr.
- Ghurelal and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- State of Maharashtra v. Abu Salem Abdul Kayyam Ansari and Ors.
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- The State of Maharashtra v. Farook Mohammed Kasim Mapkar & Ors.
- Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and Another v. State of Maharashtra
- Amin Khan v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra Etc. v. Dhanendra Shriram Bhurle Etc.
- Manoj & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- State of Rajasthan v. Bhawani and Anr.
- Prakash Dhawal Khairnar (Patil) v. State of Maharashtra
- Abdul Karim v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
- State Through Superintendent of Police, Cbi/Sit Etc. v. Nalini and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- State of Rajasthan v. Ram Bharosi and Ors.