Central Excise Act, 1944 · Chapter VIA: Appeals
Section 35F: Deposit of certain percentage of duty demanded or penalty imposed before filing appeal
[[35F. Deposit of certain percentage of duty demanded or penalty imposed before filing appeal.— The Tribunal or the Commissioner (Appeals), as the case may be, shall not entertain any appeal—
(i) under sub-section (1) of Section 35, unless the appellant has deposited seven and a half per cent of the duty, in case where duty or duty and penalty are in dispute, or penalty, where such penalty is in dispute, in pursuance of a decision or an order passed by an officer of Central Excise lower in rank than the [Principal Commissioner of Central Excise or Commissioner of Central Excise];
(ii) against the decision or order referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 35-B, unless the appellant has deposited seven and a half per cent of the duty, in case where duty or duty and penalty are in dispute, or penalty, where such penalty is in dispute, in pursuance of the decision or order appealed against;
(iii) against the decision or order referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 35-B, unless the appellant has deposited ten per cent of the duty, in case where duty or duty and penalty are in dispute, or penalty, where such penalty is in dispute, in pursuance of the decision or order appealed against:
Provided that the amount required to be deposited under this section shall not exceed Rupees Ten crores:
Provided further that the provisions of this section shall not apply to the stay applications and appeals pending before any appellate authority prior to the commencement of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section "duty demandeddbqtd shall include,—
(i) amount determined under Section 11D;
(ii) amount of erroneous CENVAT credit taken;
(iii) amount payable under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001 or the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 or the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.]]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 35F
- Rekha Rani v. The Union of India and Ors
- M/S. Krush Exim v. Commissioner of Customs & Ors
- Mr Mohammad Abdul Hakim v. Commissioner Appeal Customs and Central Excise New Delhi & Anr
- Raj Kumar Batra v. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)
- M/S Om Gems and Jewellery v. Principal Commissioner, Directorate of International Customs, Free Trade Agreements (Fta) Cell New
- Ajay Sagar v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import)
- M/S Goldy Engineering Works v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Anr
- M/S Sharp Moulds and Dies v. Commisioner of Central Exciseand Anr & Anr
- Mohammed Akmam Uddin Ahmed and Ors v. Commissioner Appeals Custom and Central Excise & Ors
- Commissioner of Customs (Import), Raigad v. M/S. Finacord Chemicals (P) Ltd. & Ors.
- Ketan v. Parekh v. Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement and Another.
- Monotosh Saha v. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate and Anr.
- M/S. Benara Valves Ltd. and Ors. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Anr.
- Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune and Ors.
- Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of Bihar and Ors.