Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter VII: Appeals Appeals From Original Decrees · Appeals from appellate decrees
Section 100: Second appeal
(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in the body of this Code or by any other law for the time being in force, an appeal shall lie to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any Court subordinate to the High Court, if the High Court is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of law.
(2) An appeal may lie under this section from an appellate decree passed ex parte.
(3) In an appeal under this section, the memorandum of appeal shall precisely state the substantial question of law involved in the appeal.
(4) Where the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law is involved in any case, it shall formulate that question.
(5) The appeal shall be heard on the question so formulated and the respondent shall, at the hearing of the appeal, be allowed to argue that the case does not involve such question:
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall be deemed to take away or abridge the power of the Court to hear, for reasons to be recorded, the appeal on any other substantial question of law, not formulated by it, if it is satisfied that the case involves such question.]
State amendments to this section
Kerala.
In sub-section (1) of section 100 of the Principal Act, after clause (c), the following clause shall be added, namely:
(d) the finding of the lower appellate court on any question of fact material to the right decision of the case on the merits being in conflict with the finding of the Court of first instance on such question.
[Vide Kerala Act 13 of 1957 sec. 4.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 100
-
Mitc Rolling Mills Private Limited and Anr. v. M/S Renuka Realtors and Ors.
Whether an order rejecting the plaint u/Or.VII r.11 of the CPC is appealable u/s.13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
-
Dharmrao Sharanappa Shabadi and Others v. Syeda Arifa Parveen
Whether the impugned judgments suffer from perversity and misreading of evidence, warranting re-appreciation of evidence under Article 136 of the Constitution of India; whether the High Court is correct in reversing the…
-
Divyangnakumari Harisinh Parmar (Dead) and Others v. Union of India and Others
The following issues arise for determination in the instant appeals: (i) What is the true nature of the rights in the land granted to the Appellants; (ii) Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with and…
-
Haryana Power Purchase Centre (Hppc) and Others v. Gmr Kamalanga Energy Limited and Others
The APTEL dismissed the appeals (Appeal no.135 of 2018 along with Appeal no.54 of 2019) and upheld the order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) in Petition No.105/MP/20173.
-
C.P. Francis v. C.P. Joseph and Others
Whether the High Court, while invoking the Proviso to s.100(5), CPC, was correct in referring to and applying s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925; whether s.67, Indian Succession Act, 1925 is attracted to determine the…
-
Nilima Das Gupta (Deceased) Through Its Lrs. v. On the Death of Abdur Rouf His Legal Heirs & Ors.
Issue arose as regards to whether D.W.5-son could have entered the witness box and deposed on behalf of his mother-defendant No.1.
-
Ram Charan & Ors. v. Sukhram & Ors.
Issue arose whether a tribal woman or her legal heirs would be entitled to an equal share in her ancestral property or not.
-
Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority and Ors. v. Nirmala Devi
The matter pertains to allotment of residential plots/commercial sites to the Oustees-respondents pursuant acquisition of their land for the purpose of development of the residential sector. The issue arose whether the…
-
[Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Adani Power
Issue pertains to whether the notification by the Coal India imposing Evacuation Facility Charges constituted a change in law under the Power Purchase Agreement; and as regards the interpretation of Article 10.2.1…
-
Rajeev Gupta & Ors. v. Prashant Garg & Ors.
Issue arose whether the suit was barred by limitation; whether the sale deeds were void documents; whether the Will stood admitted in the previous suits and was no longer required to be proved; whether the First…
-
Angadi Chandranna v. Shankar & Ors.
The main dispute in the lis is, whether the suit property was ancestral or self-acquired property of defendant no.1.
-
Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee & Ors.
Matter pertains recall of judgment of this Court on the ground that the respondents in the appeals were not served.
-
R. Nagaraj (Dead) through LRs. and Another v. Rajmani and Others
Whether the High Court was justified in remanding the matter to the trial Court for a fresh trial on the issue of limitation, despite the existence of concurrent findings, when section 100 of the Code of Civil…
-
N.P. Saseendran v. N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.
The question to be decided herein is twin fold, whether the document of the year 1985 is a gift or Settlement or Will and whether the requirements under law or conditions in the deed have been satisfied to vest a legal…
-
H. Anjanappa & Ors. v. A. Prabhakar & Ors.
Whether a transferee pendente lite has a right to be impleaded in the suit by seeking leave to appeal and in case he is not impleaded, whether he is bound by the decree passed in the said suit.
-
Vipin Kumar v. Jaydeep & Others
Whether there has been a miscarriage of justice as the second appeal was allowed ex parte without hearing the appellant and without framing any substantial questions of law.
-
U. Sudheera & Others v. C. Yashoda & Others
Whether the High Court can pass any ad interim order for a limited period, before framing substantial question(s) of law, while dealing with a second appeal filed under Order XLI r/w Section 100 CPC.
-
Mallavva and Anr v. Kalsammanavara Kalamma (Since Dead) by Legal Heirs & Ors.
Whether the original suit filed by the plaintiffs even after the amendment of the plaint at the stage of first appeal seeking possession of the suit property could be said to be time barred. In other words, whether the…
-
Daliben Valjibhai & Ors. v. Prajapati Kodarbhai Kachrabhai & Anr.
Whether a suit for cancellation of a registered sale deed, filed within three years from the date of knowledge as alleged in the plaint, can be dismissed at the threshold under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil…
-
Manjit Singh & Anr. v. Darshana Devi & Ors.
High Court held that the appellants-subsequent purchasers could not be said to be bona fide purchasers in accordance with Section 19 (b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and decreed the suit of the plaintiff granting…
-
The State of Haryana & Anr. v. Amin Lal (Since Deceased) Through His Lrs & Ors.
Respondents/Plaintiffs had filed a suit for possession of the suit property against the Appellants/Defendants, i.e. State of Haryana and Public Works Department. The Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the…
-
Ramachandra Reddy (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. v. Ramulu Ammal (Dead) Thr. Lrs.
Whether the deed executed, which gave rise to the present property dispute, was a gift deed or a deed of settlement; Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of fact while exercising…
-
State Bank of India & Ors. v. The Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan
Whether the Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG) could have been adjusted against the first tranche payment which was to be made under the Resolution Plan, within 180 days from the Effective Date, in contravention of the…
-
Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India v. Delhi International Airport Ltd. & Ors.
Whether Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) has a right to contest an appeal against its order determining tariff for aeronautical services before Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT),…
-
Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited v. Hirehalli Solar Power Project Llp & Others
Whether the extension of the Scheduled Commissioning Date (SCD) was occasioned under the force majeure clause of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), and consequently, whether the reduction in tariff payable to the…
-
Nek Pal & Ors. v. Nagar Palika Parishad & Ors.
Whether substantial questions of law are required to be formulated at the time of admission of a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, or at any time subsequent thereto.
-
Duni Chand v. Vikram Singh and Others
Whether the High Court erred in extending the benefit of Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, to the defendants despite the lack of specific pleadings, and no evidence to show consent of interested persons.
-
Har Narayan Tewari (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Cantonment Board,
Whether the present suit (claiming title and possession over the suit land) as filed by the plaintiff-appellant was barred under Section 11 CPC on principle of res judicata inasmuch as there was no adjudication of the…
-
Lehna Singh (D) By Lrs. v. Gurnam Singh (D) By Lrs. & Ors.
Issue arose whether the questions of law are not required to be framed in second appeal before Punjab and Haryana High Court whose jurisdiction in second appeal is circumscribed by provision of s.41 of the Punjab Act.
-
Mrugendra Indravadan Mehta and Others v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
Trial Court decreed the suit filed by appellants-plaintiffs by accepting the alternative prayer that they should be allotted an extent of 974 sq. mts. in any Town Planning Scheme in the western zone of Ahmedabad, but…
-
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India v. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu & Ors.
Special Court under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would be as provided u/s. 435 of the Companies Act as it existed at the time when the Code came into effect, or it would be as provided u/s.435 after the 2018…
-
Brij Narayan Shukla (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Sudesh Kumar Alias
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the suit filed by the appellant for the relief of injunction with alternative relief for possession on the ground of limitation as the respondent perfected their rights…
-
Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the Second Appeal filed by the respondents and setting aside the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the Sub-Judge dismissing the suit of the respondents and…
-
P. Kishore Kumar v. Vittal K. Patkar
The plaintiff ’s vendor applied u/s. 9A of the Mysore (Personal & Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954 and sought occupancy rights in respect of 15 acres of Sy. No. 3. According to the plaintiff , the claim of the…
- Sri. K.M. Krishna Reddy v. Sri. Vinod Reddy & Anr.
-
Suresh Lataruji Ramteke v. Sau. Sumanbai
Whether in the absence of affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties on addressing the framed substantial questions of law, the High Court could have proceeded to decide the same in an appeal u/s.100, CPC…
-
Appaiya v. Andimuthu @ Thangapandi & Ors .
Whether the High Court was correct in holding that owing to the non-production of any document by appellant evincing as to how the sons’ of the seller obtained the suit property in a partition Exhibit A1-registered sale…
-
Hemavathi and Ors. v. V. Hombegowda
High Court whether justified in allowing Regular Second Appeal filed u/s.100, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 without framing the substantial question of law.
- Ramathal and Ors. v. K. Rajamani (Dead)
- Government of Kerala & Anr. v. Joseph and Others
- T. D. Vivek Kumar & Anr. v. Ranbir Chaudhary
- Gmr Warora Energy Ltd. v. Central Electricity
- Sap Labs India Private Limited v. Income Tax
- Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner
- The State of Himachal Pradesh v. Chandervir
- Manik Majumder and Others v. Dipak Kumar Saha
- Desh Raj & Ors. v. Rohtash Singh
- The Tata Power Company Limited Transmission v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors.
- Suresh G. Ramnani v. Aurelia Ana De Piedade Miranda @ Ariya Alvares (Dead Thr. Lrs) & Ors.
- The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Etc. Etc v. Uday Education and Welfare Trust and Anr. Etc
- Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission
- Kapil Kumar v. Raj Kumar
- Chandrabhan (Deceased) Through Lrs. & Ors. v. Saraswati & Ors.
- M/S. Shivali Enterprises v. Smt. Godawari (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. and Others
- Pushpalata v. Vijay Kumar (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
- Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another
- Satyender and Ors. v. Saroj and Ors
- Sau Rajani v. Sau Smita & Anr
- Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association and Anr v. Union of India and Anr
- Hardial Singh v. Balbir Kaur & Anr.
- Heera Traders v. Kamla Jain
- Azgar Barid (D) by Lrs. v. Mazambi @ Pyaremabi and Others
- Amar Nath (Dead) Through L.R. v. Gian Chand and Ors.
- Seethakathi Trust Madras v. Krishnaveni
- Murthy & Ors. v. C. Saradambal & Ors.
- Hasmat Ali v. Amina Bibi & Ors.
- State of Haryana v. Harnam Singh (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
- M/S. Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of UP & Ors. Etc.
- Sughar Singh v. Hari Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. & Ors.
- Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.
- Avtar Singh & Ors. v. Bimla Devi & Ors.
- The Jamia Masjid v. Sri K V Rudrappa (Since Dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
- K. N. Nagarajappa & Ors. v. H. Narasimha Reddy
- Dena Bank (Now Bank of Baroda) v. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr.
- Ramdas Waydhan Gadlinge (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs. Vatsalabai Ramdas Gadlinge & Ors. v. Gyanchand Nanuram Kriplani (Dead) Thr Lrs. Dhrupadabai & Ors.
- Sridevi Datla v. Union of India and Ors.
- Khushi Ram & Ors. v. Nawal Singh & Ors.
- Narayan Sitaramji Badwaik (Dead) Through Lrs v. Bisaram and Others
- G H Bajranga (Dead) by Lrs. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- Kirpa Ram (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives & Ors. v. Surendra Deo Gaur & Ors.
- Rattan Singh & Ors. v. Nirmal Gill & Ors. Etc.
- Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. v. Adani Power Rajasthan Limited & Anr.
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Centre for Environment Protection Research and Development & Ors.
- Nazir Mohamed v. J. Kamala and Ors.
- Sri V.N. Krishna Murthy & Anr. Etc. Etc. v. Sri Ravikumar & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors. v. Manjit Kaur & Ors.
- Shiv Raj Gupta v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Delhi-Iv
- V. Kalyanaswamy (D) by Lrs. & Anr. v. L. Bakthavatsalam (D) by Lrs. & Ors.
- Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad v. Gangaram Narayan Ambekar & Ors.
- Mangayarkarasi v. M. Yuvaraj
- Suresh Chand and Anr. v. Suresh Chander (D) Thr Lrs. and Ors.
- Adani Gas Limited v. Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board and Ors.
- C. Doddanarayana Reddy (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors. v. C. Jayarama Reddy (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
- Google India Private Limited v. M/S. Visakha Industries
- Jitendra Singh v. Ministry of Environment & Ors.
- W. N. Allal Sundaram v. The Commissioner H.R. & C.E. Admn. Department & Ors.
- Ravi Setia v. Madan Lal and Others
- Illoth Valappil Ambunhi (D) by Lrs. v. Kunhambu Karanavan
- Sudam Kisan Gavane (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. v. Manik Ananta Shikketod (D) by Lrs. & Ors.
- State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Shiv Dayal & Anr.