Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Chapter VII: Appeals Appeals From Original Decrees · Appeals from orders
Section 104: Orders from which appeal lies
(1) An appeal shall lie from the following orders, and save as otherwise expressly provided in the body of this Code or by any law for the time being in force, from no other orders:—-
** * * *
[(ff) an order under section 35A;]
[(ffa) an order under section 91 or section 92 refusing leave to institute a suit of the nature referred to in section 91 or section 92, as the case may be;]
(g) an order under section 95;
(h) an order under any of the provisions of this Code imposing a fine or directing the arrest or detention in the civil prison of any person except where such arrest or detention is in execution of a decree;
(i) any order made under rules from which an appeal is expressly allowed by rules:
[Provided that no appeal shall lie against any order specified in clause (ff) save on the ground that no order, or an order for the payment of a less amount, ought to have been made.]
(2) No appeal shall lie from any order passed in appeal under this section.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 104
-
Wikimedia Foundation Inc. v. ANI Media Private Limited & Ors.
Issue arose with respect to the legality and propriety of the directions issued by the Division Bench of the High Court to the appellant to take down/delete the pages and discussion with regard to the observations made…
-
M/S Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Bansal Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Appellants issued work order to 1st respondent for construction of flats and paid advance. Bank guarantee equivalent to the advance money was furnished by 1st respondent to secure the amount. When the work got delayed…
-
Ramakant Ambalal Choksi v. Harish Ambalal Choksi & Others
Whether the High Court was justified in allowing the appeal filed by the defendants-respondents holding that no case for grant of interim injunction was made out and thus, vacating the order granting injunction in…
- Chintels India Ltd. v. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd.
- Jaswant Singh & Ors v. Park.Ash Kaur & Anr
- Pankajakshi (Dead) Through Lrs. & Others v. Chandrika & Others
- State of Uttarakhand (Previously State of Uttar Pradesh) v. Mohan Singh & Others
- Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd.
- Parimal v. Veena @ Bharti
- Improvement Trust, Ludhiana Etc. v. Ujagar Singh & Ors. Etc.
- Raj Kumar Shivhare v. Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Another
- Kamla Devi v. Khushal Kanwar and Anr.
- P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs v. Andhra Bank Ltd. and Ors.
- Subal Paul v. Malina Paul and Anr.
- Chandra Kanta Sinha v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- Superintending Engineer and Ors. v. B. Subba Reddy
- Durga Prasad v. Naveen Chandra and Ors.
- Resham Singh Pyara Singh v. Abdul Sattar