Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XII: Information to the Police and Their Powers to Investigate
Section 154: Information in cognizable cases
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) Every information relating to the commission of a cognizable offence, if given orally to an officer in charge of a police station, shall be reduced to writing by him or under his direction, and be read over to the informant; and every such information, whether given in writing or reduced to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by the person giving it, and the substance thereof shall be entered in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the State Government may prescribe in this behalf: [Provided that if the information is given by the woman against whom an offence under section 326A, section 326B, section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 376, [section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB], section 376E or section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed or attempted, then such information shall be recorded, by a woman police officer or any woman officer:
Provided further that—
(a) in the event that the person against whom an offence under section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 376, [section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB], section 376E or section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed or attempted, is temporarily or permanently mentally or physically disabled, then such information shall be recorded by a police officer, at the residence of the person seeking to report such offence or at a convenient place of such person‘s choice, in the presence of an interpreter or a special educator, as the case may be;
(b) the recording of such information shall be videographed;
(c) the police officer shall get the statement of the person recorded by a Judicial Magistrate under clause (a) of sub-section (5A) of section 164 as soon as possible.]
(2) A copy of the information as recorded under sub-section (1) shall be given forthwith, free of cost, to the informant.
(3) Any person aggrieved by a refusal on the part of an officer in charge of a police station to record the information referred to in sub-section (1) may send the substance of such information, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned who, if satisfied that such information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, shall either investigate the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by any police officer subordinate to him, in the manner provided by this Code, and such officer shall have all the powers of an officer in charge of the police station in relation to that offence.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 154
-
Zainul v. The State of Bihar
The High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellants herein and thereby affirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Trial Court in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1989 holding the appellants herein…
-
Mohammad Afzal Mohammad Sharif v. The State of Maharashtra and Others
The complaint of the appellant before the High Court was that the police officers concerned had failed in their duty by not registering a First Information Report apropos the attack and assault on him by four…
-
Vinod Kumar Pandey & Anr. v. Seesh Ram Saini & Ors.
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding that prima facie cognizable offences are made out for investigation against the appellant-officers of the CBI, and directing the Delhi…
-
Narayan Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned judgment relying on the confessional FIR filed by the appellant-accused himself and the medical evidence to uphold his conviction, however, altering it from s.302,…
-
S.N. Vijaylakshmi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Whether any criminal offence in the background of the factual position is made out to justify criminal proceedings against the appellants and whether the same should proceed; whether on the same cause of action, based…
-
Anurag Bhatnagar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
(i) Whether the High Court in exercise of its power u/s.482 of CrPC or under Art.226/227 of the Constitution is justified in refusing to quash the FIR No.380/2005, u/ss.420, 120-B and 34 of the IPC and the order dated…
-
Khursheed Ahmad Chohan v. Union of Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. Etc.
Issue arose as to whether the facts and circumstances disclosed in the complaint, supported by compelling medical evidence of grievous injuries, including complete genital mutilation, mandatorily required registration…
-
K.P. Tamilmaran v. The State by Deputy Superintendent of Police
Whether the High Court was justified in upholding the conviction and sentence of A-15 under Sections 217, 218, Penal Code, 1860 and ss.3(2)(i), 4, SC/ST Act, 1989 and modifying the conviction and sentence of A-14, while…
-
Pinki v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in passing various orders granting bail to accused persons in matters involving offences of serious nature of child trafficking.
-
Imran Pratapgadhi v. State Of Gujarat and Anr.
Whether on facts, the offences punishable under Sections 196, 197, 299 and 302 of the BNS as alleged, were made out against the appellant, a Member of Rajya Sabha; whether the High Court erred in rejecting the petition…
-
Amit Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
(i) What is the scope of section 174 CrPC and how is it different from investigation pursuant to filing of FIR under section 154 CrPC. (ii) Whether recourse to inquest proceedings under Section 174 of the CrPC by the…
-
Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Does the decision in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [2013] 14 SCR 713 create an absolute rule that a preliminary inquiry must be conducted in every case before the registration of an FIR.
-
Sita Ram & Anr. v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court holding the appellant no.1 guilty of offence punishable u/s. 304 IPC and appellant no. 2 for offences punishable u/ss. 323 and 451 IPC and…
-
State of Rajasthan v. Surendra Singh Rathore
Issue arose as to whether the registration of the subsequent FIR is legally permissible and whether the High Court was correct in exercising its inherent powers in quashing the same.
-
State of Karnataka v. T.N. Sudhakar Reddy
Whether High Court was justified in quashing the FIR registered against the Respondent in the absence of a preliminary enquiry before registration of FIR under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988;…
-
Suman Mishra & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in finding that there were specific allegations in the FIR and Chargesheet even after dropping the charge of Section 376, IPC in order to maintain the criminal proceedings against the…
-
State of Jharkhand v. Dr. Nishkant Dubey & Ors.
What are the essential conditions that must be satisfied to attract the provisions of Section 366 of the IPC? What are the essentials to constitute a trespass as criminal trespass? Whether the procedure provided under…
-
Om Prakash Ambadkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Magistrate passed an order under Section 156(3), Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 directing registration of FIR against the appellant-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 294, 500, 504 & 506,…
-
B.N. John v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Appellant herein has sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising under sections 353 and 186 of IPC.
-
Tarina Sen v. Union of India & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the appellants would be justified, when the matter has been compromised between the borrower and Bank.
-
Dharmendra Kumar @ Dhamma v. State of Madhya Pradesh
High Court if justified in upholding conviction and sentence of the appellant under ss. 302/34 IPC; the contradictions or discrepancies and the absence of blood group classification or inconclusive FSL results on the…
-
Anees v. The State Govt. of NCT
Murder of appellant-accused’s wife in their house in which the appellant, deceased and their 5 year old daughter lived. s.106, Evidence Act, 1872 was invoked and the appellant was convicted u/s.302, IPC for the murder.…
-
Apoorva Arora & Anr. Etc. v. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Whether the use of expletives and profane language in the titles and content of the episodes of the web-series ‘College Romance’ constitutes an offence of publication and transmission of obscene and sexually explicit…
-
Shailesh Kumar v. State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand)
What is the goal of investigation and what is the role of investigating officer; Are s.172 CrPC and ss. 145 & 161 of the Evidence Act to be read in consonance with each other; Can a General Diary entry precede the…
- Hariprasad @ Kishan Sahu v. State of
-
Dhanraj N Asawani v. Amarjeetsingh Mohindersingh
Whether the provisions of s.81(5B) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 can be construed as preventing a share holder of the society such as the app ellant, who was also an erstwhile director, from…
- The State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Suvendu Adhikari &
- Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri
- Ritu Chhabaria v. Union of India & Ors.
- Saurav Das v. Union of India & Ors.
- Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Xyz v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors
- Honnaiah T.H. v. State of Karnataka and Others
- Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Himanshu Kumar and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
- Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited
- Vijay Kumar Ghai & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
- Gangadhar Narayan Nayak @ Gangadhar Hiregutti v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Jitul Jentilal Kotecha v. State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc
- The State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others v. Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman
- Kavitha Lankesh v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Prashant Singh Rajput v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
- Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Anr. v. Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi @ T. H. Vijayalakshmi and Anr.
- Government of Maharashtra (Water Resources Department) Represented by Executive Engineer v. M/S Borse Brothers Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
- Krishna Lal Chawla & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Kapil Agarwal and Others v. Sanjay Sharma and Others
- Dr Naresh Kumar Mangla v. Smt. Anita Agarwal & Ors. Etc.
- Amish Devgan v. Union of India and Others
- Rajesh @ Sarkari & Anr v. State of Haryana
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Mukesh Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)
- Union of India v. Ashok Kumar Sharma and Others
- Rana Nahid @ Reshma @ Sana & Anr. v. Sahidul Haq Chisti
- Arnab Ranjan Goswami v. Union of India and Ors.
- Sushila Aggarwal and Others v. State (Nct of Delhi) and Another
- Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India and Others
- Yashwant Sinha & Ors. v. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Director & Anr.
- Ebha Arjun Jadeja & Ors. v. The State of Gujarat
- Union of India v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Pradeep Ram v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Shree Shree Ram Janki Ji Asthan Tapovan Mandir & Anr. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
- State by Karnataka Lokayukta Police Station, Bengaluru v. M.R. Hiremath
- The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. v. Elephant G. Rajendran & Ors. Etc.
- Pattu Rajan v. The State of Tamil Nadu
- M/S Scg Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K. S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- State of Kerala v. Rasheed
- Mohanlal v. The State of Punjab
- The State of Bihar & Ors. v. Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti
- State by Lokayuktha Police v. H. Srinivas
- Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and Anr.
- Manju Surana v. Sunil Arora & Ors.
- Atul Thakur v. State of Himachal Pradesh Etc. Etc.
- Teesta Atul Setalvad v. The State of Gujarat
- S. Mohammed Ispahani v. Yogendra Chandak & Others
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Nirmala Devi
- The State of Telangana v. Habib Abdullah Jeelani & Ors.
- Karma Dorjee & Ors v. Union of India and Ors
- Bhagwan Jagannath Markad & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- Dr. Ram Lakhan Singh v. State Government of Uttar Pradesh Through Chief Secretary
- People'S Union for Civil Liberties & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Mohd. Haroon & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Vishal Agrawal & Anr. v. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board & Anr.
- Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary and Ors.
- State of Gujarat v. Girish Radhakrishnan Varde
- Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors.
- Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah v. The Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Umesh Singh v. State of Bihar
- Republic of Italy and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Budhi Singh v. State of H.P.
- Yanab Sheikh@ Gagu v. State of West Bengal
- Anju Chaudhary v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Surajit Sarkar v. State of West Bengal
- Anand Mohan v. State of Bihar
- Samaj Parivartan Samudaya & Ors. v. State of Karnataka &Ors.
- Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. & Others