Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter I: Preliminary
Section 2: Definitions
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In this Code, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) —bailable offence‖ means an offence which is shown as bailable in the First Schedule, or which is made bailable by any other law for the time being in force; and —non-bailable offence‖ means any other offence;
(b) —charge‖ includes any head of charge when the charge contains more heads than one;
(c) —cognizable offence‖ means an offence for which, and —cognizable case‖ means a case in which, a police officer may, in accordance with the First Schedule or under any other law for the time being in force, arrest without warrant;
(d) —complaint‖ means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.
Explanation.—A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint; and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant;
(e) —High Court‖ means,—
(i) in relation to any State, the High Court for that State;
(ii) in relation to a Union territory to which the jurisdiction of the High Court for a State has been extended by law, that High Court;
(iii) in relation to any other Union territory, the highest Court of criminal appeal for that 1. The words —except the State of Jammu and Kashmir‖ omitted by Act 34 of 2019, s. 95 and the Fifth Schedule (w.e.f. 31-10-2019).
territory other than the Supreme Court of India;
(f) —India‖ means the territories to which this Code extends;
(g) —inquiry‖ means every inquiry, other than a trial, conducted under this Code by a Magistrate or Court;
(h) —investigation‖ includes all the proceedings under this Code for the collection of evidence conducted by a police officer or by any person (other than a Magistrate) who is authorised by a Magistrate in this behalf;
(i) —judicial proceeding‖ includes any proceeding in the course of which evidence is or may be legally taken on oath;
(j) —local jurisdiction‖, in relation to a Court or Magistrate, means the local area within which the Court or Magistrate may exercise all or any of its or his powers under this Code [and such local area may comprise the whole of the State, or any part of the State, as the State Government may, by notification, specify];
(k) —metropolitan area‖ means the area declared, or deemed to be declared, under section 8, to be a metropolitan area;
(l) —non-cognizable offence‖ means an offence for which, and —non-cognizable case‖ means a case in which, a police officer has no authority to arrest without warrant;
(m) —notification‖ means a notification published in the Official Gazette;
(n) —offence‖ means any act or omission made punishable by any law for the time being in force and includes any act in respect of which a complaint may be made under section 20 of the Cattle-trespass Act, 1871 (1 of 1871);
(o) —officer in charge of a police station‖ includes, when the officer in charge of the police station is absent from the station-house or unable from illness or other cause to perform his duties, the police officer present at the station-house who is next in rank to such officer and is above the rank of constable or, when the State Government so directs, any other police officer so present;
(p) —place‖ includes a house, building, tent, vehicle and vessel;
(q) —pleader‖, when used with reference to any proceeding in any Court, means a person authorised by or under any law for the time being in force, to practise in such Court, and includes any other person appointed with the permission of the Court to act in such proceeding;
(r) —police report‖ means a report forwarded by a police officer to a Magistrate under sub-section (2) of section 173;
(s) —police station‖ means any post or place declared generally or specially by the State Government, to be a police station, and includes any local area specified by the State Government in this behalf;
(t) —prescribed‖ means prescribed by rules made under this Code;
(u) —Public Prosecutor‖ means any person appointed under section 24, and includes any person acting under the directions of a Public Prosecutor;
(v) —sub-division‖ means a sub-division of a district;
(w) —summons-case‖ means a case relating to an offence, and not being a warrant-case; [(wa) —victim‖ means a person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or 1. Ins. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 2 (w.e.f. 18-12-1978). 2. Ins. by Act 5 of 2009, s. 2 (w.e.f. 31-12-2009).
omission for which the accused person has been charged and the expression —victim‖ includes his or her guardian or legal heir;]
(x) —warrant-case‖ means a case relating to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term exceeding two years;
(y) words and expressions used herein and not defined but defined in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Code.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 2
-
Vikram Bakshi and Others v. R.P. Khosla and Another
Whether a review or recall of an order passed in a criminal proceeding initiated under section 340 of CrPC is permissible or not.
-
Devendra Kumar v. The State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
High Court affirmed the order passed by the CMM directing registration of the FIR against the petitioner for offences punishable u/ss.186 and 341, Penal Code, 1860. Whether the CMM erred in involving the police in a…
-
Khem Singh (D) Through Lrs v. State of Uttaranchal (Now State of Uttarakhand) & Another Etc.
During pendency of these appeals, son of original appellant (since deceased) filed an application seeking setting aside of the abatement and for substitution. Whether the applicant is entitled to be substituted in place…
-
Bansal Milk Chilling Centre v. Rana Milk Food Private Ltd. & Anr.
When can amendments to complaints be allowed after cognizance is taken; whether on facts, any prejudice would be caused to the accused-respondents if the amendment to the complaint, as prayed, is allowed.
-
Asian Paints Limited v. Ram Babu & Another
Whether the appellant-company falls under the definition of ‘victim’ in terms of s.2(wa) r/w the proviso to s.372, CrPC or whether s.378, CrPC would prevail in the facts and circumstances; whether an appeal under the…
-
Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal
Whether the High Court can invoke its inherent jurisdiction u/s.482, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 or s.528, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to quash proceedings initiated u/s.12, Protection of Women from…
-
Umashankar Yadav & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Through Chief Secretary & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred by not quashing the prosecution against the accused under ss.186 and 353 of Indian Penal Code.
-
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Ramesh Chander Diwan
Whether the High Court was right in holding that sanction under Section 197, Cr.PC not having been obtained, the respondent should be discharged for the offences registered under Sections 120B and 420 of the IPC against…
-
M/s Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.
Issue arose as regards the maintainability of an appeal under proviso to s.372 CrPC against order of acquittal in a case instituted upon a private complaint u/s.138 Negotiable Instruments Act, by treating the…
-
Jamin & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
(i) Whether the High Court was right in exercising its revisional jurisdiction for the purpose of setting aside the order of the Trial Court rejecting the second application preferred by the respondent no.2 u/s.319 of…
-
Mahabir & Ors. v. State of Haryana
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment and order of conviction in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction u/s.401 r/w. s.397 of the CrPC; Whether Proviso to s.372 of CrPC creates a…
-
B.N. John v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Appellant herein has sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising under sections 353 and 186 of IPC.
-
Subrata Choudhury @ Santosh Choudhury & Ors. v. The State of Assam & Anr.
Whether after the acceptance of a negative Final Report in the first complaint, upon considering the written objections/protest petition and hearing the complainant, a fresh/second complaint on the same set of facts is…
-
Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office
(a) Whether the complaint filed u/s.44(1)(b) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 will be governed by sections 200 to 205 of the CrPC; (b) If the accused was not arrested by the ED till the filing of the…
-
Mukhtar Zaidi v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Whether CJM as also the High Court fell in error in taking cognizance u/s. 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. inasmuch as the CJM had relied upon not only the Protest Petition which was supported by affidavit of the complainant but also…
-
Rakesh Ranjan Shrivastava v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Whether the provision of sub-section (1) of s.143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for the grant of interim compensation, is directory or mandatory. If it is held to be a directory provision, what are…
-
Dablu Kujur v. The State of Jharkhand
The issue for consideration was the compliance of the requirements of a Police Report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
-
Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
Whether the power of the High Court or the Court of Session to grant anticipatory bail u/s 438 CrPC could be exercised with respect to an FIR registered outside the territorial jurisdict ion of the said Court; and…
-
M/S Iveco Magirus Brandschutztechnik Gmbh v. Nirmal Kishore Bhartiya & Anr
(i) Whether, while considering a private complaint alleging defamation, the Magistrate before summoning the accused ought to confine himself to the allegations forming par t of the petition only or he may, applying his…
- CBI v. R.R. Kishore
- Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri
- P. v. Nidhish & Ors. v. Kerala State Wakf Board &
- Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary v. The State of
- Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka v. Tourism
- Vinod Katara v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- P. Dharamaraj v. Shanmugam & Ors.
- Honnaiah T.H. v. State of Karnataka and Others
- Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari v. The State of Maharashtra
- Jagjeet Singh & Ors v. Ashish Mishra @ Monu & Anr.
- Kamatchi v. Lakshmi Narayanan
- Gangadhar Narayan Nayak @ Gangadhar Hiregutti v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Nahar Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- Pradeep S. Wodeyar v. The State of Karnataka
- Hariram Bhambhi v. Sc/St
- Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Vinod Dua v. Union of India & Ors.
- P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Mukesh Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)
- Union of India v. Ashok Kumar Sharma and Others
- Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India & Others
- Haribhai Malaviya and Ors. v. The State of Gujarat and Anr.
- Union of India v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank v. D. Visalakshi and Anr.
- Vishnu Kumar Tiwari v. State of Uttar Pradesh Through Secretary Home, Civil Secretariat Lucknow and Another
- National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
- Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India
- State of Gujarat v. Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta
- Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) Represented Through Legal Representatives v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Ratanlal v. Prahlad Jat & Ors.
- Amit Vashistha v. Suresh and Another
- Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Classic Credit Ltd.
- Roopendra Singh v. State of Tripura & Anr.
- Satyapal Singh v. State of M.P. and Ors.
- K. Anbazhagan v. State of Karnatakaand Others