Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XVI: Commencement of Proceedings Before Magistrates
Section 204: Issue of process
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) If in the opinion of a Magistrate taking cognizance of an offence there is sufficient ground for proceeding, and the case appears to be—
(a) a summons-case, he shall issue his summons for the attendance of the accused, or
(b) a warrant-case, he may issue a warrant, or, if he thinks fit, a summons, for causing the accused to be brought or to appear at a certain time before such Magistrate or (if he has no jurisdiction himself) some other Magistrate having jurisdiction.
(2) No summons or warrant shall be issued against the accused under sub-section (1) until a list of the prosecution witnesses has been filed.
(3) In a proceeding instituted upon a complaint made in writing, every summons or warrant issued under sub-section (1) shall be accompanied by a copy of such complaint.
(4) When by any law for the time being in force any process-fees or other fees are payable, no process shall be issued until the fees are paid and, if such fees are not paid within a reasonable time, the Magistrate may dismiss the complaint.
(5) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to affect the provisions of section 87.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 204
-
Devendra Kumar v. The State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
High Court affirmed the order passed by the CMM directing registration of the FIR against the petitioner for offences punishable u/ss.186 and 341, Penal Code, 1860. Whether the CMM erred in involving the police in a…
-
Kallu Nat Alias Mayank Kumar Nagar v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Whether the Court of Session, without itself recording evidence, can summon a person to stand trial in exercise of its powers u/s.193, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as an accused (along with others committed to it by…
-
Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal
Whether the High Court can invoke its inherent jurisdiction u/s.482, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 or s.528, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to quash proceedings initiated u/s.12, Protection of Women from…
-
Kushal Kumar Agarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
An opportunity of being heard was not given by the Special Judge to the appellant-accused before taking cognizance of the offence on the complaint. Whether opportunity of being heard is required in terms of the proviso…
-
Shahed Kamal & Ors. v. M/s A. Surti Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Whether the complaint filed by the respondent makes out a case for offences punishable under Section 500 read with Section 34, IPC against the appellants.
-
Rikhab Birani & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the s.482, CrPC application filed by the appellants despite the matter being civil in nature.
-
Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aditya Sarda
Matter pertains to the sustainability of orders passed by the High Court granting anticipatory bail to respondents accused of serious economic offences, and avoiding execution of summons or warrants, disobeying the…
-
Rekha Sharad Ushir v. Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahkari Patsansta Ltd.
Whether the complaint filed by the respondent-Credit Co-operative Society under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque allegedly issued by the appellant in favour of the…
-
Subrata Choudhury @ Santosh Choudhury & Ors. v. The State of Assam & Anr.
Whether after the acceptance of a negative Final Report in the first complaint, upon considering the written objections/protest petition and hearing the complainant, a fresh/second complaint on the same set of facts is…
-
Somjeet Mallick v. State of Jharkhand & Others
Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the FIR, the cognizance order and the proceedings in pursuance thereof without considering the materials collected during investigation.
-
Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
High Court, if justified in declining to quash and set aside the summoning order passed by the Magistrate, against the appellants-company and its office bearers, for offence punishable u/ss. 406 and 420 IPC.
-
Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office
(a) Whether the complaint filed u/s.44(1)(b) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 will be governed by sections 200 to 205 of the CrPC; (b) If the accused was not arrested by the ED till the filing of the…
-
Yash Tuteja & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors
The issue for consideration was a challenge to the Complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement under Section 44(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, mainly on the ground that apart from s. 120B…
-
Vikas Chandra v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Respondent No.2 was summoned to face the trial for the offence under Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860. High Court whether justified in quashing the summons.
-
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
The Amicus submitted report dated 10.02.2024 indicating the directions that have been complied with by the parties in terms of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil**. On basis of the said…
- Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri
- Shri Sukhbir Singh Badal v. Balwant Singh Khera
- Sunil Todi & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- Shantaben Bhurabhai Bhuriya v. Anand Athabhai Chaudhari & Ors.
- Haribhai Malaviya and Ors. v. The State of Gujarat and Anr.
- Vishnu Kumar Tiwari v. State of Uttar Pradesh Through Secretary Home, Civil Secretariat Lucknow and Another
- Birla Corporation Limited v. Adventz Investments and Holdings Limited & Others
- State of Gujarat v. Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta
- Prabhu Dutt Tiwari v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- S. Mohammed Ispahani v. Yogendra Chandak & Others
- Amrutbhai Shambhubhai .Patel v. Sumanbhai Kantibhai Patel & Ors.
- Abhijit Pawar v. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar & Anr.
- Standard Chartered Bank v. State of Maharashtra and Others Etc.
- S.R. Sukumar v. S. Sunaad Raghuram
- Mehmood Ul Rehman v. Khazir Mohammad Tunda and Ors.
- A.C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Sanjaysinh Ramrao Chavan v. Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke and Others
- Rishipal Singh v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Devendra Kishanlal Dagalia v. Dwarkesh Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors.
- Urmila Devi v. Yudhvir Singh
- A.C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Dharam Pal & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Anr.
- Nupur Talwar v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Bhushan Kumar & Anr. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- Shiv Shankar Singh v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- Shivjee Singh v. Nagendra Tiwary and Ors.
- Reeta Nag v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
- Hira Lal & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- Ajoy Kumar Ghose v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Ketankumar Babulal Patel v. Kesarben Jesangji and Ors.
- Sayeeda Farhana Shamim v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- S.K. Sinha, Chief Enforcement Officer v. Mis. Videocon International Ltd. & Ors.
- Everest Advertising Pvt. Ltd. v. State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
- Rashida Kamaluddin Syed and Anr. v. Shaikh Saheblal Mardan (Dead) Through Lrs. and Anr.
- D. Vinod Shivappa v. Nanda Belliappa
- S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Neeta Bhalla and Anr.
- Poonam Chand Jain and Anr. v. Fazru
- Mahesh Chand v. B. Janardhan and Anr.
- M/S. Swil Ltd. v. State of Delhi and Anr.
- The State of Bihar v. Chandra Bhushan Singh and Ors.
- U.P. Pollution Control Board v. M/S. Mohan Meakins Ltd. and Ors.
- Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain v. Pandey Ajay Bhushan and Ors.
- State Through CBI v. Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar and Ors.
- Smt. Swarnalata Sarkar v. State of West Bengal and Ors.