VoxJuris
Home › Acts › CrPC › Chapter XXV › Section 328

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXV: Provisions As to Accused Persons of Unsound Mind

Section 328: Procedure in case of accused being lunatic

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.

Now in the BNSS section 367 (Procedure in case of accused being person of unsound mind)

In plain words

If a Magistrate in an inquiry believes the accused is of unsound mind and cannot defend themselves, they must inquire, have them examined by the civil surgeon or other medical officer, and examine that doctor as a witness. If found of unsound mind, they are referred to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, with an appeal to a Medical Board.

  • If found incapable of defence because of unsoundness of mind, and no prima facie case is made out, the accused is discharged. If a case is made out, the inquiry is postponed for treatment.
  • If found incapable because of mental retardation (intellectual disability), the inquiry is closed.
  • In each case the accused is dealt with under section 330.

A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.

Official text

(1) When a Magistrate holding an inquiry has reason to believe that the person against whom the inquiry is being held is of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making his defence, the Magistrate shall inquire into the fact of such unsoundness of mind, and shall cause such person to be examined by the civil surgeon of the district or such other medical officer as the State Government may direct, and thereupon shall examine such surgeon or other officer as a witness, and shall reduce the examination to writing. 1. Subs. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 27, for —Magistrate‖ (w.e.f. 18-12-1978). 2. Subs. by s. 27, ibid., for —from one Magistrate to another Magistrate‖(w.e.f. 18-12-1978). 3. S. 327 renumbered as sub-section (1) thereof by Act 43 of 1983, s. 4 (w.e.f. 25-12-1983). 4. Ins. by s. 4, ibid. (w.e.f. 25-12-1978). 5. Subs. by Act 22 of 2018, s. 17, for —section 376A, section 376B, section 376C section 376D" (w.e.f. 21-4-2018). 6. Ins. by Act 5 of 2009, s. 24 (w.e.f. 31-12-2009).

[(1A) If the civil surgeon finds the accused to be of unsound mind, he shall refer such person to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist for care, treatment and prognosis of the condition and the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, as the case may be, shall inform the Magistrate whether the accused is suffering from unsoundness of mind or mental retardation:

Provided that if the accused is aggrieved by the information given by the psychiatric or clinical psychologist, as the case may be, to the Magistrate, he may prefer an appeal before the Medical Board which shall consist of—

(a) head of psychiatry unit in the nearest government hospital; and

(b) a faculty member in psychiatry in the nearest medical college.]

(2) Pending such examination and inquiry, the Magistrate may deal with such person in accordance with the provisions of section 330. [(3) If such Magistrate is informed that the person referred to in sub-section (1A) is a person of unsound mind, the Magistrate shall further determine whether the unsoundness of mind renders the accused incapable of entering defence and if the accused is found so incapable, the Magistrate shall record a finding to that effect, and shall examine the record of evidence produced by the prosecution and after hearing the advocate of the accused but without questioning the accused, if he finds that no prima facie case is made out against the accused, he shall, instead of postponing the enquiry, discharge the accused and deal with him in the manner provided under section 330:

Provided that if the Magistrate finds that a prima facie case is made out against the accused in respect of whom a finding of unsoundness of mind is arrived at, he shall postpone the proceeding for such period, as in the opinion of the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, is required for the treatment of the accused, and order the accused to be dealt with as provided under section 330.

(4) If such Magistrate is informed that the person referred to in sub-section (1A) is a person with mental retardation, the Magistrate shall further determine whether the mental retardation renders the accused incapable of entering defence, and if the accused is found so incapable, the Magistrate shall order closure of the inquiry and deal with the accused in the manner provided under section 330.]

Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.

Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.

Supreme Court judgments citing the section 328