Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974
Section 8: Advisory Boards
For the purposes of sub-clause (a) of clause (4), and sub-clause (c) of clause (7), of article 22 of the Constitution,—
(a) the Central Government and each State Government shall, whenever necessary, constitute one or more Advisory Boards each of which shall consist of a Chairman and two other persons possessing the qualifications specified in sub-clause (a) of clause (4) of article 22 of the Constitution;
(b) save as otherwise provided in section 9, the appropriate Government shall, within five weeks from the date of detention of a person under a detention order make a reference in respect thereof to the Advisory Board constituted under clause (a) to enable the Advisory Board to make the report under sub-clause (a) of clause (4) of article 22 of the Constitution;
(c) the Advisory Board to which a reference is made under clause (b) shall after considering the reference and the materials placed before it and after calling for such further information as it may deem necessary from the appropriate Government or from any person called for the purpose through the appropriate Government or from the person concerned, and if, in any particular case, it considers it essential so to do or if the person concerned desires to be heard in person, after hearing him in person, prepare its report specifying in a separate paragraph thereof its opinion as to whether or not there is sufficient cause for the detention of the person concerned and submit the same within eleven weeks from the date of detention of the person concerned;
(d) when there is a difference of opinion among the members forming the Advisory Board, the opinion of the majority of such members shall be deemed to be the opinion of the Board;
(e) a person against whom an order of detention has been made under this Act shall not be entitled to appear by any legal practitioner in any matter connected with the reference to the Advisory Board, and the proceedings of the Advisory Board and its report, excepting that part of the report in which the opinion of the Advisory Board is specified, shall be confidential;
(f) in every case where the Advisory Board has reported that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for the detention of a person, the appropriate Government may confirm the detention order and continue the detention of the person concerned for such period as it thinks fit and in every case where the Advisory Board has reported that there is in its opinion no sufficient cause for the detention of the person concerned, the appropriate Government shall revoke the detention order and cause the person to be released forthwith.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 8
- Pradeep Kumar Nehra v. Union of India & Ors
-
Jaseela Shaji v. The Union of India & Ors.
Issue arose as to whether the non-supply of the statement of the person stating about the detenu’s dealing in foreign exchange to the detenu, has affected the right of the detenu to make an effective representation…
-
Shabna Abdulla v. The Union of India & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the detenue’s sister-in-law challenging the detention order as well as the…
- Ankit Ashok Jalan v. Union of India and Ors.
- Union of India v. Nisar Pallathukadavil Aliyar
- Bipinchandra Gamanlal Chokshi and Another v. State of Gujarat and Others
- Smt. Moulana Shamshunnisa & Etc. v. Additional Chief Secretary & Ors.
- Thahira Haris Etc. v. Govt. of Karnataka & Ors.
- State of Maharashtra & Ors v. Zubair Haji Qasim
- Alpesh Navinchandra Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Usha Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors.
- Sri Anand Hanumathsa Katare v. Additional District Magistrate and Ors
- D.Anuradha v. Joint Secretary and Anr.
- Madhu Garg v. Union of India and Anr.
- A.C. Razia v. Government of Kerala and Ors.
- Sunil Fulchand Shah v. Union of India and Ors.
- Meena Jayendra Thakur v. Union of India and Ors.
- K.M. Abdulla Kunhi and B.L. Abdul Khader v. Union of India and Ors., State of Karnataka and Ors.
- Vijay Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
- Pushpadevi M. Jatia v. M.L. Wadhavan, Addl. Secretary Government of India & Ors.
- Harbans Lal v. M.L. Wadhawan & Ors.
- State of Rajasthan & Anr. v. Shamsher Singh
- Ibrahim Ahmad Batti v. State of Gujarat & Others
- Devji Vallabhbhai Tandel Etc. v. The Administrator of Goa, Daman & Diu & Anr.
- Nand Lal Bajaj v. The State of Punjab and Anr.
- Smt. Masuma v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Kavita W/O Sunder Shankardas Devidasani Etc. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Narendra Purshotam Umrao Etc. v. B. B. Gujral & Ors.
- Nirmal Kumar Khandelwal v. Union of India and Ors.