Constitution of India · Part III: Fundamental Rights · Right to Equality
Article 18: Abolition of titles
In plain words
The State cannot confer titles, except military or academic distinctions. Citizens cannot accept titles from foreign States.
- A non-citizen holding an office of profit or trust under the State needs the President's consent to accept a foreign title.
- Anyone holding such an office needs the President's consent to accept any present, payment or office from a foreign State.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 18
-
Jitender @ Kalla v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
(a) Whether the 100-point assessment laid down in Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2017) 9 SCC 766 and modified in Indira Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2023) 8 SCC 1 for the designation of Senior…
-
Dr. Tanvi Behl v. Shrey Goel & Ors.
Whether providing domicile/residence-based reservation in admission to Postgraduate (PG) Medical Courses within the State Quota is constitutionally invalid and impermissible; Difference between domicile and residence…
-
State of Andhra Pradesh and Others v. Dr. Rao, V.B.J. Chelikani and Others
Issue arose that whether the Government, like any private individual, have the absolute discretion to frame policy, distribute resources and enter into a contract with whomsoever it pleases, on any terms and conditions…
-
IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus
Issue arose as regards the constitutional validity of s.6A of the Citizenship Act; does s.6A offend preambular values like fraternity; s.6A, if ultra vires Part II of the Constitution; does s.6A create an unreasonable…
- Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India
- Indian Young Lawyers Assn. v. State of Kerala 561 Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors.V. the State of Kerala & Ors.
- Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
- Lok Prahari, Through Its General Secretary S. N. Shukla & Another v. Union of India Through Its Secretary & Others
- Ms. Indira Jaising v. Through Secretary General and Ors.
- State of Punjab & Ors. v. The Senior Vocational Staff Masters Association
- State of Punjab & Ors. v. Rafiq Masih (White Washer)
- Abhay Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
- Harjinder Singh v. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation
- Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India & Ors
- Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. R. Veerasw Amy and Ors.
- State of Gujarat and Anr. v. Honble High Court of Gujarat
- Balaji Raghavan S.P. Anand v. Union of India