Constitution of India · Part XII: Finance, Property, Contracts and Suits · Distribution of Revenues between the Union and the States
Article 276: Taxes on professions, trades, callings and employments
In plain words
A State law taxing professions, trades, callings or employments, for the State or a local authority, is not invalid merely because it is a tax on income. The total such tax payable by one person to the State or any one local authority cannot exceed two thousand and five hundred rupees a year.
- This does not limit Parliament's power to tax income from professions, trades, callings and employments.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Notwithstanding anything in article 246, no law of the Legislature of a State relating to taxes for the benefit of the State or of a municipality, district board, local board or other local authority therein in respect of professions, trades, callings or employments shall be invalid on the ground that it relates to a tax on income.
(2) The total amount payable in respect of any one person to the State or to any one municipality, district board, local board or other local authority in the State by way of taxes on professions, trades, callings and employments shall not exceed [two thousand and five hundred rupees] per annum. * * * *
(3) The power of the Legislature of a State to make laws as aforesaid with respect to taxes on professions, trades, callings and employments shall not be construed as limiting in any way the power of Parliament to make laws with respect to taxes on income accruing from or arising out of professions, trades, callings and employments.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 276
-
State of Kerala & Another v. Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd. & Others
The questions for consideration were: 1) Whether appellants-assessees, engaged in broadcasting of signals etc. through television channels to subscribers of those channels, were liable to pay entertainment tax under…
- Yudhvir Singh & Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Dlehi & Ors
- Gajender Singh Drall and Ors v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
- Krishna Kumar Singh & Anr v. State of Bihar & Ors.
- Jindal Stainless Ltd. & Anr v. State of Haryana & Ors
- Karnataka Bank Ltd. v. State of A.P. & Ors.
- All India Federation of Tax Practitioners & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Rameshwar Prasad and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
- The State of West Bengal and Ors. v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and Ors.
- Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Industries v. Union of India and Ors.
- M/S. B.R. Enterprises Etc. Etc. v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Cantonment Board, Mhow and Anr. v. M.P. State Road Transport Corpn.
- Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India Etc. Etc.
- The Cantonment Board,Mathura v. Krishna Bricks and Lime Factory
- M/S. Gujarat Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. v. Collector, Central Excise, Baroda.
- Man Mohan Tuli v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
- State of Gujarat & Ors Etc. v. Raman Lal Keshav Lal & Ors. Etc.
- R. R. Engineering Co. v. Zila Parishad, Bareilly & Anr.
- Municipal Council, Pusad v. Gokaldas Dossa & Co. Ltd.
- Munshi Ram and Ors. v. Municipal Committee, Chheharta
- State of Karnataka v. Union of India & Another
- State of Punjab & Anr. v. Prem Sukhdas & Ors.
- Bata Shoe Co. v. City of Jabalpur Corporation
- Mahapalika of City of Agra v. Agra Brickkiln Owners' Association & Ors.
- Kamta Prasad Aggarwal Etc. v. Executive Officer, Ballabgarh & Anr.
- Prakash Chand Maheshwari & Anr. v. Zila Parishad, Muzaffarnagar & Ors.
- Babu Ram Prakash Chandra Maheshw Ari v. Antarim Zila Parishad Muzaffar Nagar
- Municipal Commitiee, Akot v. Manilal Manekji Pvt. Ltd. and Another
- K. S. Venkataraman & Co. v. State of Madras
- Kalyani Stores v. The State of Orissa and Others
- Commissioner, Quilon Municipality, Quilon, and Another v. M/S. Harrisons & Crosfield Ltd.
- C. Rajagopalachari v. Corporation of Madras
- Smt. Ujjam Bai v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. The State of Ra.Jasthan and Others
- Bangalore Woollen, Cotton and Silk Mills Co. Ltd., Bangalore v. Corporation of the City Oe Bangalore, by Its Commissioner, Bangalore City.
- Bangalore Woollen, Cotton and Silk Mills Co. Ltd., Bangalore v. The Corporation of the City of Bangalore by Its Commlssioner, Bangalore City. (With Connected Appeal)
- Atiabari Tea Co., Ltd. v. The State of Assam and Others. (And Connected Petition and Appeals)
- The Western India Theatres Ltd. v. The Cantonment Board, Poona, Cantonment
- The State of Bombay v. R. M. D. Chamarbaugwala
- Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay