Constitution of India · Part XIII: Trade, Commerce and Intercourse Within the Territory of India
Article 302: Power of Parliament to impose restrictions on trade, commerce
In plain words
Parliament can by law impose restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between States or within any part of India, as required in the public interest.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 302
- Mahesh Gupta v. Registrar of Trademarks & Anr
- State of Gujarat and Others Etc. v. Jayeshbhai Kanjibhai Kalathiya Etc.
- Jindal Stainless Ltd. & Anr v. State of Haryana & Ors
- State of U.P. and Ors. v. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.
- M/S. Jindal Stainless Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India and Ors.
- Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- State of Punjab and Anr. v. Mis. Devans Modern Breweries and Anr. Etc.
- T.M.A. Pal Foundation and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
- Ahamed Nassar v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
- M/S. B.R. Enterprises Etc. Etc. v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. v. Dharam Bir
- Shri Digvijay Cement Co. Etc. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Etc.
- State of Tripura and Ors. v. Sudhir Ranjan Nath
- P. Kannadasan Etc. Etc. v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. v. Sanjeetha Trading Co. and Ors.
- Video Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Etc. Etc. v. State of Punjab & Anr. Etc. Etc .
- Indian Cement and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
- Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan and Others Etc. Etc. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- State of Tamil Nadu v. Hindu Stone Etc.
- Syed Ahmed Aga Etc. v. State of Mysore & Another
- State of Tamil Nadu, Etc v. Sitalakshmi Mills, Etc .
- H. H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jiwaji Rao Scindia Bahadur & Ors. v. Union of India
- Hansraj Bagrecha v. State of Bihar & Ors.
- State of Kerala v. A. B. Abdul Khadir & Ors.
- State of Madras v. N. K. Nataraja Mudaliar
- State of Mysore v. H. Sanjeeviah
- Kalyani Stores v. The State of Orissa and Others
- Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. &Anr. v. The State of Assam
- The Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. The State of Ra.Jasthan and Others
- Joseph Kuruvilla Vellukunnel v. The Reserve Bank of India and Others
- Atiabari Tea Co., Ltd. v. The State of Assam and Others. (And Connected Petition and Appeals)
- Saghir Ahmad v. The State of U. P. and Others.