Constitution of India · Part III: Fundamental Rights · Saving of Certain Laws
Article 31C: Saving of laws giving effect to certain directive principles
In plain words
A law giving effect to the Directive Principles in Part IV cannot be struck down for being inconsistent with articles 14 or 19. A law that declares it is for giving effect to that policy cannot be challenged in court on the ground that it does not actually do so.
- A State law gets this protection only if it has received the President's assent.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing [all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV] shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by [article 14 or article 19;] [and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy]:
Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 31C
-
IN RE: ZUDPI JUNGLE LANDS versus
Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not.
-
The State of Tamil Nadu v. The Governor of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
a. What courses of action are available to the Governor in exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution. b. Whether the Governor can reserve a Bill for the consideration of the President when it is…
-
involved and in I.R. Coelho v. State of T.N. [(1999) 7
(1) Whether Article 31C (as upheld in Kesavananda Bharati case) survives in the Constitution after amendment to the provision by the forty-second amendment was struck down by the Supreme Court in Minerva Mills case; and…
- Coal India Limited v. Competition Commission
- Association of Vasanth Apartments’ Owners v. V. Gopinath & Ors
- Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India
- The State of Karnataka & Anr v. B. R. Muralidhar & Ors.
- Nemai Chandra Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors v. Mani Square Ltd. & Ors
- Pattali Makkal Katchi v. A. Mayilerumperumal & Ors.
- Union of India & Anr. v. Balwant Singh & Ors.
- Ravindra Ramchandra Waghmare v. Indore Municipal Corporation & Ors.
- Jindal Stainless Ltd. & Anr v. State of Haryana & Ors
- Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Another v. Union of India
- Nemai Chandra Kumar & Ors. v. Mani Square Ltd. & Ors.
- Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Another
- Society for Un-Aided P.School of Rajasthan v. U.O.I. & Anr.
- K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. State of Karnataka
- State of West Bengal & Ors. v. The Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal & Ors
- Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India & Ors
- I. R. Coelho (Dead) by Lrs. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Arun Kumar and Ors v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and Ors.
- Kaiser-I-Hind Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Ltd. and Ors.
- State of U.P. v. The Upper Jamuna Valley Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- U.P. State Electricity Board v. Upper Jamuna Valley Electricity Supply Co. Ltd.
- State of Tamil Nadu v. M/S. Arooran Sugars Ltd.
- The Property Owners' Association and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Dr. K.R. Lakshmanan Etc. Etc. v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. v. Ananthi Ammal and Ors.
- Sh. Jilubhai Nanbhai Khachar Etc Etc. v. State of Gujarat and Anr. Etc. Etc.
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India and Ors.
- Raghunathrao Ganpatrao Etc. Etc. v. Union of India
- Assam Sillimanite Limited and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Maharashtra State Electricity Board v. Thana Electric Supply Co. & Others.
- Tinsukhia Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam and Ors.
- Vellore Electric Corporation Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- Navnit R. Kamani & Ors. v. R.R. Kamani
- H.S. Srinivasa Raghavachar Etc. Etc. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Panipat Woollen & General Mills Co. Ltd. & Another v. Union of India & Others
- Minerva Mills Ltd. & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors.
- State of Maharashtra & Anr. v. Basantibal Mohanlal Khetan & Ors.
- Satyavir Singh and Others v. Union of India and Others. Etc. Etc.
- Union of India and Another v. Tulsiram Patel and Others
- State of Tamil Nadu, Etc. Etc. v. L. Abu Kavur Bai and Ors. Etc.
- Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Another
- Waman Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Maharao Sahib Sri Bhim Singhji Etc. Etc v. Union of India and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Minerva Mills Ltd. & Ors v. Union of India & Ors.
- Seth Nand Lal & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Excel Wear Etc. v. Union of India and .Ors.
- State of Karnataka and Anr Etc. v. Shri Ranganatha Reddy & Anr. Etc.
- Dattatraya Govind Mahajan & Ors. Etc. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Shri Raj Narain
- His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalavaru v. State of Kerala