Constitution of India · Part XVII: Official Language · High courts, etc
Article 348: Language to be used in the Supreme Court and in the High Courts and for Acts, Bills, etc
In plain words
Until Parliament provides otherwise by law, all proceedings in the Supreme Court and every High Court, and the authoritative texts of all Bills, Acts, Ordinances, orders, rules, regulations and bye-laws of Parliament and the States, must be in English.
- A Governor can, with the President's consent, allow Hindi or another official language of the State in High Court proceedings, but not for judgments, decrees or orders.
- Where a State uses another language for its Bills, Acts or rules, an English translation published in the State's Official Gazette under the Governor's authority is the authoritative English text.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, until Parliament by law otherwise provides—
(a) all proceedings in the Supreme Court and in every High Court;
(b) the authoritative texts—
(i) of all Bills to be introduced or amendments thereto to be moved in either House of Parliament or in the House or either House of the Legislature of a State;
(ii) of all Acts passed by Parliament or the Legislature of a State and of all Ordinances promulgated by the President or the Governor *** of a State; and
(iii) of all orders, rules, regulations and bye-laws issued under this Constitution or under any law made by Parliament or the Legislature of a State, shall be in the English language.
(2) Notwithstanding anything in sub-clause (a) of clause (1), the Governor *** of a State may, with the previous consent of the President, authorise the use of the Hindi language, or any other language used for any official purposes of the State, in proceedings in the High Court having its principal seat in that State:
Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply to any judgment, decree or order passed or made by such High Court.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in sub-clause (b) of clause (1), where the Legislature of a State has prescribed any language other than the English language for use in Bills introduced in, or Acts passed by, the Legislature of the State or in Ordinances promulgated by the Governor *** of the State or in any order, rule, regulation or bye-law referred to in paragraph (iii) of that sub-clause, a translation of the same in the English language published under the authority of the Governor *** of the State in the Official Gazette of that State shall be deemed to be the authoritative text thereof in the English language under this article.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 348
-
Mrs. Varshatai w/o. Sh. Sanjay bagade v. The State of Maharashtra through
Issue arose whether use of Urdu on a signboard of the building of Municipal Council in Maharashtra is violative of any provision of law.
- Quantum University v. International Quantum University for Integrative Medicine Inc
- Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd v. Afcons Gunanusa Jv
- Sunil Kumar Rai & Ors. v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
- Rajendra Diwan v. Pradeep Kumar Ranibala & Anr.
- Nabam Rebia, and Bamang Felix v. Deputy Speaker and Others
- U.P. Hindi Sahitya Sammelan v. State of U.P.
- U.P. State Sugar & Cane Development Corporation Limited v. Chini Mill Mazdoor Sangh & Others
- Balbir Kaur & Anr. v. U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Allahabad & Ors.
- Doiwala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. v. State of Uttaranchal and Ors.
- Prabhat Kumar Sharma v. Union Public Service Commission and Ors.
- State of U.P. v. Neeraj Awasthi and Ors.
- Gurudevdatia Vksss Maryadit and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Dr. Vijay Laxmi Sadho v. Jagdish
- Naga People'S Movement of Human Rights Etc. v. Union of India
- Nityanand Sharma and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Ors .
- Dr. Harihar Prasad Singh and Ors. v. Principal, M.L.N. Medical College Allahabad and Others.
- S.P. Gupta & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalavaru v. State of Kerala
- Madhu Limaye and Anr. v. Ved Murti & Ors.