Constitution of India · Part V: The Union · The President and Vice-President
Article 72: Power of President to grant pardons, etc., and to suspend, remit or commute sentences in certain cases
In plain words
The President can grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment, or suspend, remit or commute sentences, in cases tried by court martial, in offences against laws on Union subjects, and in all death sentence cases.
- This does not affect the powers of armed forces officers over court-martial sentences, or a Governor's power to suspend, remit or commute death sentences under State law.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Read the in-depth explanation, with key Supreme Court rulings ↓
Official text
(1) The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence—
(a) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is by a Court Martial;
(b) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends;
(c) in all cases where the sentence is a sentence of death.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the power conferred by law on any officer of the Armed Forces of the Union to suspend, remit or commute a sentence passed by a Court Martial.
(3) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of clause (1) shall affect the power to suspend, remit or commute a sentence of death exercisable by the Governor *** of a State under any law for the time being in force.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Understanding this article
Article 72 gives the President power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites and remissions, and to suspend, remit or commute sentences, in cases of court martial, offences against Union law, and all death sentences. It is a constitutional power of mercy, exercised on the advice of the Union Council of Ministers.
The forms of clemency
- Pardon: wipes out the conviction and sentence.
- Commutation: substitutes a lighter form of punishment.
- Remission: reduces the period of sentence without changing its character.
- Respite: a lesser sentence for special reasons, such as pregnancy.
- Reprieve: temporary suspension, typically of a death sentence.
Nature of the power
The power is not judicial. The President may examine the record and reach a different conclusion on guilt or sentence, without altering the judicial record. It is exercised on ministerial advice.
Limited judicial review
Courts can review the decision on limited grounds: that it was made without application of mind, on irrelevant or extraneous considerations, mala fide, arbitrarily, or without the advice of the Council of Ministers. Courts do not examine the merits. Unexplained delay in deciding mercy petitions can itself be a ground for commutation.
Key Supreme Court rulings
Kehar Singh v. Union of India (1989) 1 SCC 204
The President may scrutinise the evidence and come to a different conclusion on guilt and sentence; in doing so he does not amend or supersede the judicial record, acting on a wholly different plane from the court; the exercise is subject to limited judicial review.
Epuru Sudhakar v. Govt. of A.P. 2006 INSC 695
Limited judicial review of the pardon power is available; a remission based on irrelevant and extraneous material, with relevant facts not disclosed, was set aside.
Common mistakes
- Treating the pardon power as a judicial appeal.
- Assuming the President acts in personal discretion.
Read with: Article 161 Constitution, Article 74 Constitution
Prepared with AI assistance as a study aid. Every ruling listed was checked against the Supreme Court's own judgments on this site, and quoted words appear in those judgments; linked names open the full judgment. Read the judgments themselves before relying on them. Not legal advice.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 72
-
Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. Union of India & Ors.
Writ petition filed u/Art.32 challenging the continuing validity of the sentence of death against the petitioner, having been affirmed on appeal, declined in review, and followed by the rejection of mercy petitions and…
-
Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan v. State of (NCT of Delhi) & Others
Whether, an accused/convict who has completed his “life imprisonment for a fixed term” such as twenty years of actual sentence without remission, as in the instant case, is entitled to be released from prison on…
-
Kum. Shubha @ Shubhashankar v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the conviction of the appellants by the High Court u/s.302 read with s.120-B, IPC and additionally, s.201, IPC for A-4 alone, is justified.
-
The State of Tamil Nadu v. The Governor of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
a. What courses of action are available to the Governor in exercise of his powers under Article 200 of the Constitution. b. Whether the Governor can reserve a Bill for the consideration of the President when it is…
-
IN RE: POLICY STRATEGY FOR GRANT OF BAIL versus
The first issue is whether the power to grant remission can be exercised without the convict or anyone on behalf of the convict applying to the appropriate Government for a grant of remission. The second issue is about…
-
Om Prakash @ Israel @ Raju @ Raju Das v. Union of India and Another
Issue arose as regards plea of juvenility raised u/s.9(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
-
State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Pradeep Yashwant Kokade & Anr.
Effect of delay in executing the death sentence.
- Vijay Kumar Shukla v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Arshad Ali @ Munna Khan v. State (Gnct of Delhi)
-
Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar & Anr.
Need for a comprehensive sentencing policy. Trial against the accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was conducted by the judicial officer in utmost haste and the accused was denied due…
-
Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Others
Writ petition filed u/Art. 32 by one of the victims challenging the order of State of Gujarat granting remission and early release of 11 convicts held guilty in Bilkis Bano matter, if maintainable; writ petitions filed…
-
Joseph v. The State of Kerala
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking appropriate direction to the Sta te Government, to prematurely release him, having been in custody-actual imprisonment for over 26 years, and served a sentence…
-
Rajo @ Rajwa @ Rajendra Mandal v. The State
Petitioner serving a sentence of life imprisonment for commission of offences punishable u/ss.302/34 of the IPC, 1860 and s.27 of the Arms Act, 1959 sought direction for his premature release on the ground that he has…
- Balwant Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
- Ravinder Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Inox Air Products Private Limited v. Mr. Arun Rathi
- B. A. Umesh v. Union of India & Ors.
- In Re: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances to Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences v. In Re: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances to Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences
- Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari v. The State of Maharashtra
- Manoj Pratap Singh v. The State of Rajasthan
- Manoj & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- A.G. Perarivalan v. State, Through Superintendent of Police Cbi/Sit/ Mmda, Chennai, Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- Atbir v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Ram Chander v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Anr.
- Pappu v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Irappa Siddappa Murgannavar v. State of Karnataka
- The State of Haryana & Ors v. Raj Kumar @ Bittu
- Shatrughna Baban Meshram v. State of Maharashtra
- Satish @ Sabbe v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Pyare Lal v. State of Haryana
- Pawan Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Vinay Sharma v. Union of India and Others
- Mukesh Kumar v. Union of India and Others
- Manoharan v. State by Inspector of Police, Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore
- Shayara Bano v. Union of India and Others
- Vikas Yadav v. State of U.P. and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Muthuramalingam & Ors. v. State Rep. by Insp. of Police
- State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Lal Singh @ Manjit Singh & Ors.
- Tara Sfngh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Home Department and Others
- Shabnam v. Union of India & Ors
- Ajay Kumar Pal v. Union of India and Another
- Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors.
- Navneet Kaur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
- V. Sriharan @ Murugan v. Union of India & Ors.
- Shatrughan Chauhan & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- State of Rajasthan v. Jamil Khan
- Gurvail Singh @ Gala v. State of Punjab
- Krishnan & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Bhaikon @ Bakul Borah v. State of Assam
- Mahendra Nath Das v. Union of India and Others
- Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. State of Maharashtra
- Devender Pal Singh Bhullar v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab
- Sangeet & Anr. v. State of Haryana
- State of U.P. v. Sanjay Kumar
- Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral v. State of Maharashtra
- Narayan Dutt and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.
- Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod v. The State of Gujarat
- Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. Bani Kant Das and Ors.
- Samjuben Gordhanbhai Koli v. State of Gujarat
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- State of Haryana and Ors. v. Jagdish
- Mulla & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- Ramraj @ Nanhoo @ Bihnu v. State of Chhatiisgarh
- Jag Dish v. State of M.P.
- Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Haryana v. Mahender Singh and Ors.
- C.A. Pious v. The State of Kerala and Anr.
- Swamy Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra v. State of Karnataka
- Epuru Sudhakar and Anr. v. Govt. of A.P. and Ors.
- Govt. of A.P. and Ors. v. M.T. Khan
- State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Prem Raj
- Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana
- Devender Pal Singh v. State N.C.T. of Delhi and Anr.
- Ramdeo Chauhan@ Raj Nath v. State of Assam
- Dadu @ Tulsidas v. State of Maharashtra
- Satpal and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- Kamal Kishore Etc v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- State of Haryana and Ors. v. Balwan Etc.
- Maktool Singh v. State of Punjab
- Swaran Singh v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India and Ors.
- Ashok Kumar Alias Golu v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Haryana and Anr v. Ram Diya
- State of Punjab and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Joginder Singh and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Madhu Mehta v. Union of India
- Smt. Triveniben & -Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Kehar Singh and Anr. Etc. v. Union of India & Anr.
- State of Andhra Pradesh v. Vallabhapuram Ravi
- Deena@Deen Dayal Etc. Etc. v. Union of India and Others
- Sher Singh & Others v. The State of Punjab
- T. v. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Harbans Singh v. State of U.P. & Others
- Kuljit Singh Alias Ranga v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
- Maru Ram Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Bachan Singh Etc. Etc. v. State of Punjab Etc. Etc.