Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
Section 10: Power of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate courts
Every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, powers and authority, in accordance with the same procedure and practice, in respect of contempts of courts subordinate to it as it has and exercises in respect of contempts of itself:
Provided that no High Court shall take cognizance of a contempt alleged to have been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 10
- Lechamps (Sea) Pte Ltd v. Ashish Gupta & Anr
- Court on Its Own Motion v. Sanjeev Kumar
- Smita Chaudhary v. Ms. Taruna Yadav
- M/S Nimbit Buildcon Pvt Ltd v. Malvika Kaura
- M/S Nimbit Buildcon Pvt Ltd v. Malini Sehgal
- M/S Nimbit Buildcon Pvt Ltd v. Anjali Sehgal
- M/S Nimbit Buildcon Pvt Ltd v. Mm Sehgal
- Devi Lal Garg v. Baldev Singh
- Court on Its Own Motion v. Sanjay Rathod (Advocate)
- Harish Kumar Kathuria & Anr v. Sanjay Gupta & Ors
- Sheoji Kumar Pathak v. R S Sharma
- Ajay Kumar Bhagat and Ors v. B.L. Sherwal and Anr
- Dr Hans Raj & Anr v. Anand Kamal Goel
- Suman Chadha & Anr. v. Central Bank of India
- Shyam Sahni v. Arjun Prakash and Others
- R. K. Arora General Manager & Anr. v. M/S Ace Enterprises
- Vitusah Oberoi and Ors. v. Court of Its Own Motion
- E. Bapanaiah v. Sri K.S. Raju Etc.
- Kanwar Singh Saini v. High Court of Delhi
- Arun Paswan, S.I. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
- Rachapudi Subba Rao v. The Advocate-General, Andhra Pradesh
- Arun Kshetrapal v. Registrar, High Court, Jabalpur & Anr.