Customs Act, 1962 · Chapter XV: Appeals
Section 128: Appeals to Commissioner (Appeals)
[128. Appeals to [Commissioner (Appeals)].—(1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this Act by an officer of customs lower in rank than a [Principal Commissioner of Customs or Commissioner of Customs] may appeal to the [Commissioner (Appeals)] [within sixty days] from the date of the communication to him of such decision or order:
5@[Provided that the Commissioner (Appeals) may, if he is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the aforesaid period of sixty days, allow it to be presented within a further period of thirty days.]
[(1A) The Commissioner (Appeals) may, if sufficient cause is shown at any stage of hearing of an appeal, grant time, from time to time, to the parties or any of them and adjourn the hearing of the appeal for reasons to be recorded in writing:
Provided that no such adjournment shall be granted more than three times to a party during hearing of the appeal.]
(2) Every appeal under this section shall be in such form and shall be verified in such manner as may be specified by rules made in this behalf.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 128
-
(Earlier Known as Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether by way of the circular dated 30.01.2004 the benefits granted under the statutory notification dated 01.04.2003 could have been curtailed by expanding the exclusionary clause; whether crude degummed soyabean oil…
- Kalpraj Dharamshi & Anr. v. Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd. & Anr.
- Union of India & Ors. v. M/S G S Chatha Rice Mills & Anr.
- Itc Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata IV
- Ganesan Rep by Its Power Agent G. Rukmani Ganesan v. The Commissioner, the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board & Ors.
- A.P. Power Coordination Committee & Ors. v. Mis. Lanco Kondapalli Power Ltd. & Ors.
- M.P. Steel Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise
- Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Another
- Indian Textile Paper Tube Co. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, Madras