Customs Act, 1962 · Chapter IX: Warehousing
Section 72: Goods improperly removed from warehouse, etc
(1) In any of the following cases, that is to say,—
(a) where any warehoused goods are removed from a warehouse in contravention of section 71;
(b) where any warehoused goods have not been removed from a warehouse at the expiration of the period during which such goods are permitted under section 61 to remain in a warehouse;
* * * * *
(d) where any goods in respect of which a bond has been executed under [section 59 *** ] and which have not been cleared for home consumption or [export or] are not duly accounted for to the satisfaction of the proper officer,
the proper officer may demand, and the owner of such goods shall forthwith pay, the full amount of duty chargeable on account of such goods together with [interest, fine and penalties] payable in respect of such goods
(2) If any owner fails to pay any amount demanded under sub-section (1), the proper officer may, without prejudice to any other remedy, cause to be detained and sold, after notice to the owner (any transfer of the goods notwithstanding) such sufficient portion of his goods, if any, in the warehouse, as the said officer may [deem fit].
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 72
-
M/s. Bisco Limited v. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise
The appellant had imported second hand steel mill machinery and parts covered by three transit bonds totalling 595 cases. The officials of the Preventive Branch of the Commissionerate searched the industrial premises of…
-
CONSTITUTED BY THE GoI) v. SUPT. OF CENTRAL EXCISE A ND
Whether the Customs Act, 1962 creates a first charge overriding the charge in favour of the secured creditor.
- Sundaresh Bhatt, Liquidator of Abg Shipyard v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
- M/S Sbec Sugar Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Union of India & Ors v. Shakti Lpg Ltd. & Anr
- Kesoram Rayon (A Unit of M/S. Kesoram Industries Ltd.) v. The Collector of Customs, Calcutta