Explosive Substances Act, 1908
Section 4: Punishment for attempt to cause explosion, or for making or keeping explosive with intent to endanger life or property
Any person who unlawfully and maliciously—
(a) does any act with intent to cause by an explosive substance or special category explosive substance, or conspires lo cause by an explosive substance or special category explosive substance, an explosion of a nature likely to endanger life or to cause serious injury to property; or
(b) makes or has in his possession or under his control any explosive substance or special category explosive substance with intent by means thereof to endanger life, or cause serious injury to property, or to enable any other person by means thereof to endanger life or cause serious injury to property in India,
shall, whether any explosion does or does not take place and whether any injury to person or property has been actually caused or not, be punished,—
(i) in the case of any explosive substance, with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine;
(ii) in the case of any special category explosive substance, with rigorous imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 4
-
The State of Jharkhand & Others v. Vikash Tiwary @ Bikash Tiwary @ Bikash Nath
Whether the High Court was correct in quashing the order/ memo dated 17.05.2023 issued by the Inspector General of Prisons, Ranchi, Jharkhand, making intra-State transfer of the respondent herein from Lok Nayak Jai…
-
National Investigation Agency New Delhi v. Owais Amin @ Cherry & Ors.
Applicability of Section 196-A of Code of Criminal Procedure SVT., 1989 vis-à-vis the provisions and mandate contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
- Balwant Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
- Ansar Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari v. The State of Maharashtra
- Rajesh Prasad v. The State of Bihar and Anr. Etc.
- Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Bikramjit Singh v. The State of Punjab
- Raja @ Ayyappan v. State of Tamil Nadu
- V. Rajaram v. State Represented by the Inspector of Police Cbi/Scb
- The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors.
- Munishamappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- State of Uttar Pradesh v. Wasif Haider Etc.
- Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra
- Seeni Nainar Mohammed v. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police
- Sheikh Juman & Anr. Etc. v. State of Blhar
- H.D. Sikand (D) Through Lrs. v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
- Mohd. Jalees Ansari and Others v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Pooja Pal v. Union of India and Ors.
- Jodhan v. State of M.P.
- Hussein Ghadially @M.H.G.A. Shaikh & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Mannan Sk & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
- Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Periyasami S/O. Duraisami Novanagar v. State Represented Through the Inspector of Police, Q B.Ranch Cid, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu
- State of Rajasthan v. Bhagwan Das Agrawal & Others
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayyum Ansari v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan v. State of Maharashtra
- Essa@ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Stf, CBI Mumbai, Part-Ii
- State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
- Budh Singh v. State of Haryana and Anr.
- Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali @ Deepak & Ors.
- Ashrafkhan @ Babu Munnekhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat
- Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali v. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
- Deepak Khinchi v. State of Rajasthan
- Sudevanand v. State Through CBI
- Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali v. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
- Sadhwi Pragyna Singh Thakur v. State. of Maharashtra
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Abubucker Siqqique and Anr. v. The State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cbl/Scb/Chennai, Tamil Nadu
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Mustaq Ahmed Mohammed Isak and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- Shaukat Hussain Guru v. State (Nct) Delhi & Anr.
- Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab
- Prakash Chandra Yadav v. State of Bihar and Ors.
- Idrishan Yakubhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat Through Public Prosecutor
- Suman Sood @ Kamal Jeet Kaur v. State of Rajasthan
- Daya Singh Lahoriya @ Rajeev Sudan @ Vinay Kumar v. State of Rajasthan
- State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@Afsan Guru
- Durga Prasad Gupta v. The State of Rajasthan Through C.B.L.
- State Through Special Cell, New Delhi v. Navjot Sandhu @ Afshan Guru and Ors.
- Karamjit Singh v. State (Delhi Administration)
- Shamsher Khan v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Abdul Nazar Madani Etc v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- State of M.P. v. Bhupendra Singh
- State Through Superintendent of Police, Cbi/Sit Etc. v. Nalini and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- State of Tamil Nadu v. Sivarasan @Raghu @Sivarasa and Ors.
- State (Through Cbi/New Delhi) v. S.J. Choudhary
- Devinderpal Singh v. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi
- State (Through Cbi/New Delhi) v. S.J. Choudhary