Income-tax Act, 1961 · Chapter IV: Computation of Total Income · D.—Profits and gains of business or profession
Section 41: Profits chargeable to tax
The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 from 1 April 2026. The text is kept here because the judgments below apply it.
In plain words
If an assessee was allowed a deduction for a loss, expense or trading liability, and later recovers that amount or the liability is remitted or ends, the amount recovered or the benefit is taxed as business income of that later year.
- This applies whether or not the business still exists in the later year.
- A successor in business who gets the benefit is also taxed.
- Writing off a liability in one's own books counts as remission or cessation, under Explanation 1.
- When a building, machinery, plant or furniture on which depreciation was allowed is sold, discarded, demolished or destroyed, any excess over written down value, up to the depreciation allowed, is taxed under sub-section (2).
- The section applies only if a deduction was in fact allowed earlier for that amount.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
[(1) Where an allowance or deduction has been made in the assessment for any year in respect of loss, expenditure or trading liability incurred by the assessee (hereinafter referred to as the first-mentioned person) and subsequently during any previous year,—
(a) the first-mentioned person has obtained, whether in cash or in any other manner whatsoever, any amount in respect of such loss or expenditure or some benefit in respect of such trading liability by way of remission or cessation thereof, the amount obtained by such person or the value of benefit accruing to him shall be deemed to be profits and gains of business or profession and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the income of that previous year, whether the business or profession in respect of which the allowance or deduction has been made is in existence in that year or not; or
(b) the successor in business has obtained, whether in cash or in any other manner whatsoever, any amount in respect of which loss or expenditure was incurred by the first-mentioned person or some benefit in respect of the trading liability referred to in clause (a) by way of remission or cessation thereof, the amount obtained by the successor in business or the value of benefit accruing to the successor in business shall be deemed to be profits and gains of the business or profession, and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the income of that previous year. [Explanation 1.—For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression —loss or expenditure or some benefit in respect of any such trading liability by way of remission or cessation thereof‖ shall include the remission or cessation of any liability by a unilateral act by the first mentioned person under clause (a) or the successor in business under clause (b) of that sub-section by way of writing off such liability in his accounts.]
Explanation [2]—For the purposes of this sub-section, —successor in business‖ means,—
(i) where there has been an amalgamation of a company with another company, the amalgamated company;
(ii) where the first-mentioned person is succeeded by any other person in that business or profession, the other person;
(iii) where a firm carrying on a business or profession is succeeded by another firm, the other firm;] [(iv) where there has been a demerger, the resulting company.] [(2) Where any building, machinery, plant or furniture,—
(a) which is owned by the assessee;
(b) in respect of which depreciation is claimed under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 32; and
(c) which was or has been used for the purposes of business, is sold, discarded, demolished or destroyed and the moneys payable in respect of such building, machinery, plant or furniture, as the case may be, together with the amount of scrap value, if any, exceeds the written down value, so much of the excess as does not exceed the difference between the actual cost and the written down value shall be chargeable to income-tax as income of the business of the previous year in which the moneys payable for the building, machinery, plant or furniture became due.
Explanation.—Where the moneys payable in respect of the building, machinery, plant or furniture referred to in this sub-section become due in a previous year in which the business for the purpose of which the building, machinery, plant or furniture was being used is no longer in existence, the provision of this sub-section shall apply as if the business is in existence in that previous year.] * * * * *
(3) Where an asset representing expenditure of a capital nature on scientific research within the meaning of [clause (iv) of sub-section (1), or clause (c) of sub-section (2B), of section 35], read with clause (4) of section 43, is sold, without having been used for other purposes, and the proceeds of the sale together with the total amount of the deductions made under clause (i) [or, as the case may be, the amount of the deduction under clause (ia) of sub-section (2), or clause (c) of sub-section (2B), of section 35] exceed the amount of the capital expenditure, the excess or the amount of the deductions so made, whichever is the less, shall be chargeable to income-tax as income of the business or profession of the previous year in which the sale took place.
Explanation.—Where the moneys payable in respect of any asset referred to in this sub-section become due in a previous year in which the business is no longer in existence, the provisions of this sub-section shall apply as if the business is in existence in that previous year.
(4) Where a deduction has been allowed in respect of a bad debt or part of debt under the provisions of clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section 36, then, if the amount subsequently recovered on any such debt or part is greater than the difference between the debt or part of debt and the amount so allowed, the excess shall be deemed to be profits and gains of business or profession, and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the income of the previous year in which it is recovered, whether the business or profession in respect of which the deduction has been allowed is in existence in that year or not. [Explanation.—For the purposes of sub-section (3),—
(1) —moneys payable‖ in respect of any building, machinery, plant or furniture includes—
(a) any insurance, salvage or compensation moneys payable in respect thereof;
(b) where the building, machinery, plant or furniture is sold, the price for which it is sold, so, however, that where the actual cost of a motor car is, in accordance with the proviso to clause (1) of section 43, taken to be twenty-five thousand rupees, the moneys payable in respect of such motor car shall be taken to be a sum which bears to the amount for which the motor car is sold or, as the case may be, the amount of any insurance, salvage or compensation moneys payable in respect thereof (including the amount of scrap value, if any) the same proportion as the amount of twenty-five thousand rupees bears to
the actual cost of the motor car to the assessee as it would have been computed before applying the said proviso;
(2) —sold‖ includes a transfer by way of exchange or a compulsory acquisition under any law for the time being in force but does not include a transfer, in a scheme of amalgamation, of any asset by the amalgamating company to the amalgamated company where the amalgamated company is an Indian company.] [(4A) Where a deduction has been allowed in respect of any special reserve created and maintained under clause (viii) of sub-section (1) of section 36, any amount subsequently withdrawn from such special reserve shall be deemed to be the profits and gains of business or profession and accordingly be chargeable to income-tax as the income of the previous year in which such amount is withdrawn.
Explanation.—Where any amount is withdrawn from the special reserve in a previous year in which the business is no longer in existence, the provisions of this sub-section shall apply as if the business is in existence in that previous year.]
(5) Where the business or profession referred to in this section is no longer in existence and there is income chargeable to tax under sub-section (1), *** sub-section (3), [sub-section (4) or sub-section (4A)] in respect of that business or profession, any loss, not being a loss sustained in speculation *** business, which arose in that business or profession during the previous year in which it ceased to exist and which could not be set off against any other income of that previous year shall, so far as may be, be set off against the income chargeable to tax under the sub-sections aforesaid. [(6) References in sub-section (3) to any other provision of this Act which has been amended or omitted by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 shall, notwithstanding such amendment or omission, be construed, for the purposes of that sub-section, as if such amendment or omission had not been made.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 41
- Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India
- Director General of Income Tax (Admn.) & Anr. v. M/S. Gtc Industries Ltd. & Anr.
- M/S. Speedline Agencies v. M/S. T. Stanes & Co. Ltd.
- Nectar Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
- M/S. Polyflex (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka
- The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin v. Mis. Kesaria Tea Co. Ltd.
- Commissioner of Income-Tax West Bengal-I, Calcutta v. United Provinces Electric Supply Company
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kasturi and Sons Ltd.
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta v. Sugauli Sugar Works {P) Ltd.
- The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras v. Urmila Ramesh
- M/S. Sahney Steel and Press Works Ltd., Hyderabad Etc, Etc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh-I, Hyderabad
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. M/S. Artex Manufacturing Company
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. Mis. Electric Control Gear Mfg. Co.
- The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras v. Urmila Ramesh Etc.
- Ramesh Narain Saxena and Ors. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi
- Vania Silk Mills (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad
- Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. C.I.T., Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi
- Commissioner of Agricultural Income-Tax, Trivandrum v. Kerala Estate Mooriad Chalapuram
- Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat-Ii Ahmedabad (And Vice Versa)
- Commissioner of Lncome Tax, Madhya Pradesh, Nagpur v. Hukamchand Mohanlal
- C. R. Nagappa v. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Mysore
- Commissioner of Income-Tax Bihar and Orissa v. Manager, Court of Wards Estate, Bettiah
- Commissioner of Income-Tax, Assam v. Nandlal Aggarwal & Anr.