Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter IX: Of Witnesses
Section 120: Parties to civil suit, and their wives or husbands. Husband or wife of person under criminal trial
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
In civil cases, the parties and their husbands or wives are competent witnesses. In criminal cases, the accused's husband or wife is a competent witness.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
In all civil proceedings the parties to the suit, and the husband or wife of any party to the suit, shall be competent witnesses. In criminal proceedings against any person, the husband or wife of such person, respectively, shall be a competent witness.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 120
-
Nilima Das Gupta (Deceased) Through Its Lrs. v. On the Death of Abdur Rouf His Legal Heirs & Ors.
Issue arose as regards to whether D.W.5-son could have entered the witness box and deposed on behalf of his mother-defendant No.1.
-
Vibhor Garg v. Neha
Issue arose whether the conversation between spouses secretly recorded by one of them could be permitted to be made admissible in evidence; whether in light of the Evidence Act and the Family Courts Act, 1984, a…
-
Mohammed Abdul Wahid v. Nilofer & Anr.
Whether under the Code of Civil Procedure, there is envisaged a difference between a party to a suit and a witness in a suit, does the phrase plaintiff ’s/ defendant’s witness exclude the plaintiffor defendant…
- Sirajudheen v. Zeenath & Ors.
- S. Ramachandra Rao v. S. Nagabhushana Rao & Ors.
- Azhar Sultana v. B. Rajamani & Ors.