Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter II: Of the Relevancy of Facts · Admissions
Section 20: Admissions by persons expressly referred to by party to suit
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Statements by persons to whom a party has expressly referred for information about a matter in dispute are admissions.
Example: A sells a horse to B and says "Go and ask C, C knows all about it". C's statement is an admission.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Statements made by persons to whom a party to the suit has expressly referred for information in reference to a matter in dispute are admissions.
Illustration The question is, whether a horse sold by A to B is sound. A says to B––“Go and ask C, C knows all about it”. C’s statement is an admission.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 20
- Manoj Suryavanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. v. Reliance Industries Ltd.
- M/S. Peacock Plywood Pvt. Ltd. v. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
- K.M. Singh v. Secretary, Association of Indian Universities and Others
- Hirachand Kothari (Dead) Through Lrs. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.