Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter V: Of Abetment
Section 115: Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life.—if offence not committed
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Abetting an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, where the offence is not committed as a result and no express provision applies, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to seven years, and a fine.
- If an act causing hurt to someone is done as a result, the abettor is liable to imprisonment for up to fourteen years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
if offence not committed.—Whoever abets the commission of an offence punishable with death or [imprisonment for life], shall, if that offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; if act causing harm be done in consequence.—and if any act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, and which causes hurt to any person, is done, the abettor shall be liable to imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to fourteen years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 115
- Rohit v. State
- Rahul @ Ganni v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- Sonu@Sam v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
- Pramod Pehalwan v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
- Mohammad Irfan v. State of Karnataka
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. State Rep. by Dy. Comm. of Police
- Sudevanand v. State Through CBI
- Nilesh Dinkar Paradkar v. State of Maharashtra
- Jamuna Singh v. State of Bihar
- Lachhi Ram v. State of Punjab