Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter VIII: Of Offences against the Public Tranquillity
Section 141: Unlawful assembly
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
An assembly of five or more persons is designated an “unlawful assembly”, if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is— First.—To overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, [the Central or any State Government or Parliament or the Legislature of any State], or any public servant in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant; or Second.—To resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process; or Third.—To commit any mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence; or Fourth.—By means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person, to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the enjoyment of a right of way, or of the use of water or other incorporeal right of which he is in possession or enjoyment, or to enforce any right or supposed right; or Fifth.—By means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is legally entitled to do.
Explanation.—An assembly which was not unlawful when it assembled, may subsequently become an unlawful assembly.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 141
-
Zainul v. The State of Bihar
The High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellants herein and thereby affirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Trial Court in Sessions Case No. 124 of 1989 holding the appellants herein…
-
Nitya Nand v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Whether the prosecution could prove the charges against the appellant under Sections 148 and 302/149 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the appellant was a part of the unlawful assembly and if he actually took part in…
-
Alauddin & Ors. v. The State of Assam & Anr.
Matter pertains to correctness of the order convicting the appellants for the offences punishable u/ss. 302/149 IPC when the statements in evidence full of omissions and contradictions and the evidence of last seen…
-
Parshuram v. State of M.P.
Whether the courts below were justified in convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offences punishable u/s. 302/149, s.326/149, s.324/149, s.323/149, s.147 and s.148 IPC.
-
Chandra Pratap Singh v. State of M.P.
Whether the High Court was justified in altering the charge u/s. 302 read with ss. 148 and/or 149 to a charge u/s . 302/34 IPC, and convicting and sentencing the appellant for the offence punishable u/s 302/34 and u/s.…
-
Naresh @ Nehru v. State of Haryana
Conviction of the appellants for offences punishable u/s.302 r/w s.149, IPC based on the statement of PW-9, as an eyewitness to the crime, if justified. Evidence – Of eyewitness – When not to be relied upon: Held:…
- Sandeep Kumar v. The State of Haryana & Anr.
- Kalicharan & Ors v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Lakshman Singh v. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner of Police
- Duleshwar & Anr. v. The State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)
- G H Manjit Singh v. The State of Punjab
- Dev Karan @ Lambu v. State of Haryana
- Mahendran v. The State of Tamil Nadu
- Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai Patel v. Rajivbhai Dudabhai Patel & Others
- Shakti Vahini v. Union of India and Others
- Joseph v. State, Rep. by Inspector of Police .
- Iqbal & Anr. v. State of U.P.
- Najabhai Desurbhai Wagh v. Valerabhai Deganbhai Vagh & Ors.
- Saddik @ Lalo Gulam Hussein Shaikh & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- Anita Thakur & Ors. v. Govt. of J & K & Ors.
- Ramanlal and Anr. v. State of Haryana
- Sanjeev Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. (Now State of Utiarakhand)
- Jodhan v. State of M.P.
- Inder Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan