Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVI: Of Offences Affecting the Human Body · Of Criminal Force and Assault
Section 352: Punishment for assault or criminal force otherwise than on grave provocation
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person otherwise than on grave and sudden provocation given by that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.
Explanation.—Grave and sudden provocation will not mitigate the punishment for an offence under this section, if the provocation is sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for the offence, or if the provocation is given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant, in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant, or if the provocation is given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence. Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to mitigate the offence, is a question of fact.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 352
-
Santosh Sahadev Khajnekar v. The State of Goa
Whether conviction of appellant for the offences punishable u/s.8 of the Goa Children’s Act, 2003 is sustainable; whether the appellant deserves to be given benefit under provisions of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
-
Ajwar v. Waseem and Another
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the impugned order passed by the High Court granting bail to respondent no.1-accused.
-
Suman Mishra & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in finding that there were specific allegations in the FIR and Chargesheet even after dropping the charge of Section 376, IPC in order to maintain the criminal proceedings against the…
-
Ravindra Kumar v. State of U.P. & ORS.
There was a non-disclosure of a criminal case (in which the candidate was acquitted) in the verification form of the employment. The State cancelled the selection of the appellant. Was the State justified in cancelling…
- Aminuddin v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Chetan Jeff
- Murali v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- Pradeep Ram v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Vineet Kumar & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Mohd. Haroon & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- In Re: Crl. Intimidation of Cat Member v. *
- Daulatram S/O Sadram Teli v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr. v. State of U. P. & Ors.
- Hamida v. Rashid @ Rasheed and Ors.
- Sube Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- Triloki Nath and Ors. v. State of U.P.
- Kanwar Pal Singh Gill v. State (Admn., U.T. Chandigarh) Thro Secretary and Anr.