Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of theft
Section 380: Theft in dwelling house, etc
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever commits theft in any building, tent or vessel, which building, tent or vessel is used as a human dwelling, or used for the custody of property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 380
-
State of Rajasthan v. Parmeshwar Ramlal Joshi and Others
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in reviewing its earlier orders while exercising jurisdiction u/s.528 BNSS [s.482 CrPC]
-
Jamnalal v. State of Rajasthan and Another
In the instant appeal, the father of the prosecutrix challenges the order of the High Court. By the said order, the sentence imposed on respondent no.2 herein was suspended till the final disposal of the appeal. Whether…
-
Narayan Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh
Whether the High Court erred in passing the impugned judgment relying on the confessional FIR filed by the appellant-accused himself and the medical evidence to uphold his conviction, however, altering it from s.302,…
-
Hansura Bai & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
Whether the Single Judge erred in rejecting the prayers made by the appellants (victim’s family) for transferring the investigation into the custodial death of the victim, to some other investigating agency; and to…
-
Gurmeet Kaur v. Devender Gupta & Another
Issue arose whether the appellant while discharging her duty as a public servant on the relevant date, there was any excess in the discharge of the said duty which did not require the first respondent to take a prior…
-
Suhas Chakma v. Union of India & Ors.
Access to free and timely legal aid for prison inmates.
-
Vijay Singh @ Vijay Kr. Sharma v. The State of Bihar
Issue arose as regards sustainablility of the findings of the High Court holding the appellants guilty of commission of offences u/ss. 302/34 and 364/34 IPC; as also the approach of the High Court, if in line with the…
-
State of Haryana v. Mohd. Yunus & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in convicting A1 only u/s. 323 while acquitting u/s. 302/34, and convicting and sentencing A2 u/s. 302 and 323 read with s. 34; and whether in trial u/s. 302 IPC, it is safe to…
-
Gurdev Singh Bhalla v. State of Punjab & Ors
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge allowing the application u/s. 319 CrPC summoning the appellant along with three other…
-
Vishnu Kumar Shukla & Anr. v. The State of Uttar
Whether the order passed by the High Court refusing to discharge the accused in a criminal case and quashi ng an FIR calls for interference.
-
Ruchir Rastogi v. Pankaj Rastogi and Others
High Court if justified in quashing the FIR lodged by the appellant against respondents u/ss.457, 380 and 506, IPC.
- Ram Sharan Chaturvedi v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Chetan Jeff
- Rajesh @ Sarkari & Anr v. State of Haryana
- S. Kasi v. State Through the Inspector of Police Samaynallur Police Station Madurai District
- Rana Nahid @ Reshma @ Sana & Anr. v. Sahidul Haq Chisti
- M. Srikanth v. State of Telangana and Anr.
- Birla Corporation Limited v. Adventz Investments and Holdings Limited & Others
- Khushwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
- Surendra Singh & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand
- Gottumukkala Venkata Krishamraju v. Union of India & Ors.
- Harita Sunil Parab v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others
- Shajahan v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
- Benson v. State of Kerala
- Avtar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
- State of Haryana v. Hussain
- Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan
- M. Mahendar Kumar v. M. Mani & Ors.