Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of criminal breach of trust
Section 405: Criminal breach of trust
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits “criminal breach of trust”. [[Explanation 1].—A person, being an employer [of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) or not] who deducts the employee’s contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a Provident Fund or Family Pension Fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said law, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid.] [Explanation 2.—A person, being an employer, who deducts the employees’ contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to the Employees’ State Insurance Fund held and administered by the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation established under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said Act, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid.]
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 405
-
S.N. Vijaylakshmi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Whether any criminal offence in the background of the factual position is made out to justify criminal proceedings against the appellants and whether the same should proceed; whether on the same cause of action, based…
-
Kathyayini v. Sidharth P.S. Reddy & Ors.
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against respondent nos.1 and 2 in two complaint cases whereby they were charged for offences punishable u/ss.120B, 415, 420 r/w. s.34 of Penal Code, 1860. Whether a prima…
-
Pradip N. Sharma v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application of appellant praying for quashing of the FIR registered u/ss.409, 219 and 114 of IPC and also rejected the appellant’s prayer for anticipatory bail.
-
HDFC Bank Ltd. v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
What is the nature of enquiry while determining quashing of a First Information Report u/s.482 Cr.P.C., against a Bank and its Officials.
-
Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
High Court, if justified in declining to quash and set aside the summoning order passed by the Magistrate, against the appellants-company and its office bearers, for offence punishable u/ss. 406 and 420 IPC.
-
Sharif Ahmed and Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
Nature of chargesheets filed in some jurisdictions by the State/ Police, without stating sufficient details of the facts constituting the offense or putting the relevant evidence on record; significance of chargesheets…
-
Sachin Garg v. State of U.P. and Anr.
In a case wherein the dispute was commercial in nature having no element of criminality, whether the Magistrate was justified in issuing summons for trial u/ss.406, 504 and 506, Penal Code, 1860 and the High Court in…
- M/s. D. N. SINGH v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
- Aroon Purie v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- P. Dharamaraj v. Shanmugam & Ors.
- M N G Bharateesh Reddy v. Ramesh Ranganathan and Another
- Vijay Kumar Ghai & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
- N. Raghavender v. State of Andhra Pradesh, CBI
- Mitesh Kumar J. Sha v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Salimbhai Hamidbhai Memon v. Niteshkumar Maganbhai Patel & Anr.
- K. Virupaksha & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
- Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. National Bulk Handling Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
- Mehboob-Ur-Rehman (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Sudha Seetharam & Anr
- Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v. State of Gujarat and Another
- Anand Kumar Mohatta and Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Department of Home and Anr.
- M/S. Innoventive Industrles Ltd. v. Icici Bank & Anr.
- Samir Sa.Hay @ Sameer Sahay v. State of U.P. and Another
- Amal Kumar J Ha v. State of Chhatisgarh & Anr.
- Devinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab Through CBI
- Gautam Kundu v. Manoj Kumar Assistant Director, Eastern Region, Directorate of Enforcement(Prevention of Money Laundering Act) Govt. of India
- International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials (Arci) &Ors. v. Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd.&Anr.
- Binod Kumar & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- State of NCT of Delhi v. Sanjay
- Bhaskar Lal Sharma & Anr. v. Monica & Ors.
- Sadhupati Nageswara Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Lee Kun Hee & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- M/S Thermax Ltd. & Ors. v. K.M. Johny & Ors.
- Joseph Salvaraj A. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Asoke Basak v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- V.P. Shrivastava v. Indian Explosives Ltd. & Ors.
- Srinivas Gundluri & Ors. v. M/S. Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation & Ors.
- R. Venkatakrishnan v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Mir Nagvi Askari v. C. B. I.
- Sudhir Shantilal Mehta v. C.B.I.
- Bhaskar Lal Sharma & Anr. v. Monica
- Dalip Kaur & Ors. v. Jagnar Singh & Anr.
- S.V.L.Murthy v. State Rep. by Cbi, Hyderabad
- Harmanpreet Singh Ahluwalia & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors
- K. Ashoka v. N.L. Chandrashekar & Ors.
- State of Punjab v. Pritam Chand and Ors.
- Sharon Michael and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- V.R. Dalal & Ors. v. Yougendra Naranji Thakkar & Anr.
- S. Mohan v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- S.K. Alagh v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- M/S. Suryalakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. M/S. Rajvir Industries Ltd. & Ors.
- Onkar Nath Mishra & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- Rameshwar Dass v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- Veer Prakash Sharma v. Anil Kumar Agarwal and Anr.
- Vikram Dhillon v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Parkash Singh Badal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
- M/S Indian Oil Corporation v. M/S Nepc India Ltd. and Ors.
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Karanvir
- Romesh Lal Jain v. Naginder Singh Rana and Ors.
- P.C. Aggarwala v. Payment of Wages Inspector, M.P. and Ors.
- R. Sai Bharathi v. J. Jayalalitha and Ors.
- Anwar Chand Sab Nanadikar v. State of Karnataka
- Kailash Kumar Sanwatia v. State of Bihar and Anr.
- Ram Narain Popli v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- S.W. Palanitkar and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.