VoxJuris
Home › Acts › IPC › Chapter XVII › Section 422

Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of Fraudulent Deeds and Dispositions of Property

Section 422: Dishonestly or fraudulently preventing debt being available for creditors

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.

Now in the BNS section 321 (Dishonestly or fraudulently preventing debt being available for creditors)

In plain words

Dishonestly or fraudulently preventing a debt or claim owed to oneself or another from being lawfully available to pay one's own or that person's debts is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to two years, or fine, or both.

A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.

Official text

Whoever dishonestly or fraudulently prevents any debt or demand due to himself or to any other person from being made available according to law for payment of his debts or the debts of such other person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.

Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.

Supreme Court judgments citing the section 422

  • Anurag Bhatnagar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
    2025 INSC 89525 July 2025Dismissed

    (i) Whether the High Court in exercise of its power u/s.482 of CrPC or under Art.226/227 of the Constitution is justified in refusing to quash the FIR No.380/2005, u/ss.420, 120-B and 34 of the IPC and the order dated…