Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of mischief
Section 427: Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to the amount of fifty rupees or upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 427
-
State of Chhattisgarh v. Amit Aishwarya Jogi
Whether the three-Judge Bench judgment in the case of Lalu Prasad Yadav and Anr. v. State of Bihar and Anr. lays down the correct proposition of law, or whether the same requires reference to, and resolution by a larger…
-
State of Rajasthan v. Parmeshwar Ramlal Joshi and Others
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in reviewing its earlier orders while exercising jurisdiction u/s.528 BNSS [s.482 CrPC]
-
Mamman Khan v. State of Haryana
Issue arose whether the orders of the trial court, as affirmed by the High Court, directing segregation of the appellant’s trial from that of the co-accused and requiring the filing of a separate charge sheet solely on…
-
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sekh Jamir Hossain and Ors.
The respondents herein were granted bail by the High Court for the offences punishable u/ss.143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 427, 326, 376 r/w ss.511 and 34 of IPC, 1860.
-
Lal Mohd. & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Whether the prosecution of the appellants under the UP Gangsters Act satisfies the statutory thresholds prescribed under the Act, when it is based entirely on a single FIR, in which the appellants were already arrested…
-
Jay Kishan and Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the FIR under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.…
-
Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda
Issue arose whether the petitioner-wife is entitled to the transfer of the divorce petition; and whether this Court, upon the application filed by the respondent-husband, can exercise its powers u/Art. 142(1) of the…
-
Gurmeet Kaur v. Devender Gupta & Another
Issue arose whether the appellant while discharging her duty as a public servant on the relevant date, there was any excess in the discharge of the said duty which did not require the first respondent to take a prior…
-
Tusharbhai Rajnikantbhai Shah v. Kamal Dayani & Ors.
Accused-petitioner was granted absolute interim protection of anticipatory bail by Supreme Court, until modified or altered upon final disposal of the present SLP which was pending consideration before this Court.…
-
Union of India and Others v. Shishu Pal @ Shiv Pal
Appellants, if justified in terminating the services of the respondent on the post of Constable (GD) in the CRPF after conducting a departmental inquiry against him on receiving information that he had deliberately…
-
Vinod Jaswantray Vyas (Dead) Through Lrs v. The State of Gujarat
The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.02.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, whereby, the Division Bench partly accepted the appeal preferred by the appellant accused-A1 and…
-
Rajendra Bhagwanji Umraniya v. State of Gujarat
Respondents herein were convicted by the Sessions Court for offence punishable u/s. 325 IPC and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of five years. However, the High Court reduced the sentence of five years…
-
State of Haryana v. Mohd. Yunus & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in convicting A1 only u/s. 323 while acquitting u/s. 302/34, and convicting and sentencing A2 u/s. 302 and 323 read with s. 34; and whether in trial u/s. 302 IPC, it is safe to…
-
State of Haryana v. Dharamraj
In instant appeal, the State seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the sole respondent by the Single Judge of the High Court.
- Dinganglung Gangmei v. Mutum Churamani Meetei
- Sri Gulam Mustafa v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
- Gireesan Nair & Ors. Etc. v. State of Kerala
- Gali Janardhan Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
- Yashpal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr
- Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Chetan Jeff
- Narsingh Ispat Ltd v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
- Jafarudheen & Ors. v. State of Kerala
- M. Nageswara Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
- Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar and Anr.
- Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Harjit Singh v. Inderpreet Singh @ Inder and Another
- The State of Kerala v. K. Ajith & Ors.
- Kumer Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Anr
- Sayyed Ayaz Ali v. Prakash G Goyal & Ors.
- Massimilano Latorre and Others v. Union of India and Others
- Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pearl Beverages Ltd.
- Union of India v. K. A. Najeeb
- Pradeep Kumar Sonthalia v. Dhiraj Prasad Sahu @ Dhiraj Sahu & Anr.
- Bikramjit Singh v. The State of Punjab
- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors.
- Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. National Bulk Handling Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
- State of Odisha and Ors. v. Gobinda Behera
- Mauji Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
- State of Maharashtra v. Shankar Ganapati Rahatol & Ors.
- State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Abhijit Singh Pawar
- Nishan Singh & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Through Regional Manager & Ors.
- Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and Anr.
- Vaneet Mahajan v. State of Punjab & Ors.
- Avtar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
- Anil@ Bawa v. State of Haryana
- State of Maharashtra v. Ramlal Devappa Rathod and Others
- Vinay&Ors. v. State of Karnataka&Anr.
- Md. Jamiludin Nasir v. State of West Bengal
- State of M.P. & Ors. v. Parvez Khan
- Sanjay Gupta & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- Saurabh Kumar Through His Father v. Jailor, Koneila Jail & Anr.
- Chandra Prakash v. State of Rajasthan
- M.B. Suresh v. State of Karnataka
- State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat and Another
- Bharati Tamang v. Union of India & Ors.
- Deepak Rai v. State of Bihar
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayyum Ansari v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Commissioner of Police, New Delhi & Anr. v. Mehar Singh
- Sarabjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.
- Swiss Timing Limited v. Organising Committee, Commonwealth Games 2010 Delhi
- Kanhaiya Lal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- State of Maharashtra v. Fazal Rehman Abdul
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan v. State of Maharashtra
- Essa@ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Stf, CBI Mumbai, Part-Ii
- State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
- M. Manohar Reddy & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Ravinder Singh v. Sukhbir Singh & Ors.
- Anju Chaudhary v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Vipul Shital Prasad Agarwal v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- Sayed Mohd. Ahmed Kazmi v. State, Gnctd & Ors.
- Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary, Department of Home, Ranchl-I & Anr.
- Dr. Mehmood Nayyar Azam v. State of Chattisgarh and Ors.
- Anand Mohan v. State of Bihar
- Om Kr. Dhankar v. State of Haryana & Anr.
- Alister Anthony Pareira v. State of Maharashtra
- Rushikesh Tanaji Bhoite v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Sadhwi Pragyna Singh Thakur v. State. of Maharashtra
- Ramachandran & Ors. Etc. v. State of Kerala
- A.C. Muthiah v. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Anr.
- Narmada Bai v. State of Gujarat and Ors
- Sajjan Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- Babubhai v. State of Gujarat & Ors. Etc.
- Srinivas Gundluri & Ors. v. M/S. Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation & Ors.
- C. Magesh and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- Manoj Narain Agrawal v. Shashi Agrawal
- Renuka v. State of Karnataka & Anr.
- State of H.P. v. Ram Krishan
- Mantoo Sarkar v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others
- Kashiben Chhaganbhai Koli v. State of Gujarat
- State of Punjab v. Rajinder Singh & Ors. Etc.
- State Rep. by Inspector of Police v. Saravanan & Anr.
- Naren Chandra Naskar v. Arun Bhattacharya & Ors.
- Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr. v. State of U. P. & Ors.
- Bathula Nagamalleswara Rao & Ors. v. State Rep. by Public Prosecutor
- Vimalben Ajitbhai Patel v. Vatslabeen Ashokbhai Patel and Ors.
- B. Vishwanath v. State of Karnataka
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Paras Ram and Ors.