Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XX: Of Offences Relating to Marriage
Section 498: Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever takes or entices away any woman who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of any other man, from that man, or from any person having the care of her on behalf of that man, with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person, or conceals or detains with that intent any such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. [CHAPTER XXA
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 498
-
Chowdamma (D) by Lr and Another v. Venkatappa (D) by Lrs and Another
Issue arose whether the respondents succeeded in establishing a valid marital relationship between their mother and the deceased primarily on the basis of the oral testimony of P.W.2; and whether the relationship…
-
Amlesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Whether in the attending facts and circumstances, the High Court could have accepted a submission of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, to conduct narco-analysis test of all the accused persons (including the appellant)…
-
Pramila Devi & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
The Additional Judicial Commissioner took cognizance against one V and appellants on 13.06.2019 in SC/ST Case No.08/2017. Whether the Additional Judicial Commissioner while taking cognizance has to record detailed…
-
Ram Pyarey v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Correctness of the order of conviction against the brother-in-law for the offences punishable u/ss.306, 498-A IPC and s.4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, in the absence of any cogent evidence.
-
Kailashben Mahendrabhai Patel & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
FIR was filed against the appellants under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition under Section 482, CrPC for quashing of the said FIR and…
- Mariano Anto Bruno & Anr. v. The Inspector of Police
- Anil Bhardwaj v. The Hon’Ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- Joseph Shine v. Union of India
- Dinesh Kumar Kalidas Patel v. The State of Gujarat
- Chand Devi Daga & Ors. v. Manju K. Humatani & Ors.
- Krishna Bhatacharjee v. Sarathi Choudhury and Anr.
- Sunil v. Sakshi @ Shweta & Anr.
- Banarsi Dass and Others v. State of Haryana
- Ramaiah @ Rama v. State of Karnataka
- Bhaskar Lal Sharma & Anr. v. Monica & Ors.
- Urmila Devi v. Yudhvir Singh
- S. Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Ganna v. State of Karnataka
- Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor
- Manoj Mahavir Prasad Khaitan v. Ram Gopal Poddar and Anr.
- State of U. P. v. Santosh Kumar
- Narendra v. State of Karnataka
- Raj Kumar Khurana v. State of (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- Bhaskar Ramappa Madar and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- Rajendran & Anr. v. State Asstt. Commnr. of Police Law & Order
- B. Venkat Swamy v. Vijaya Nehru and Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Rohitas & Ors.
- Bhagwan Das v. Kartar Singh and Ors.
- Lallan Chaudhary and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.
- Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
- Jinia Keotin and Ors. v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi and Ors.
- Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana