Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. · Chapter VI: Adjudicating Authority for Corporate Persons
Section 61: Appeals and Appellate Authority
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained under the Companies Act 2013 (18 of 2013), any person aggrieved by the order of the Adjudicating Authority under this part may prefer an appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
(2) Every appeal under sub-section (1) shall be filed within thirty days before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:
Provided that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal may allow an appeal to be filed after the expiry of the said period of thirty days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeal but such period shall not exceed fifteen days.
(3) An appeal against an order approving a resolution plan under section 31 may be filed on the following grounds, namely:
(i) the approved resolution plan is in contravention of the provisions of any law for the time being in force;
(ii) there has been material irregularity in exercise of the powers by the resolution professional during the corporate insolvency resolution period;
(iii) the debts owed to operational creditors of the corporate debtor have not been provided for in the resolution plan in the manner specified by the Board;
(iv) the insolvency resolution process costs have not been provided for repayment in priority to all other debts; or
(v) the resolution plan does not comply with any other criteria specified by the Board.
[(4) An appeal against a liquidation order passed under section 33, or sub-section (4) of section 54L, or sub-section (4) of section 54N, may be filed on grounds of material irregularity or fraud committed in relation to such a liquidation order.
(5) An appeal against an order for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process passed under sub-section (2) of section 54-O, may be filed on grounds of material irregularity or fraud committed in relation to such an order.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 12 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 61
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the…
-
Visa Coke Limited v. M/s Mesco Kalinga Steel Limited
Issue arose whether the notice served by the appellant-Operational Creditor upon the Key Managerial Personnel-KMP of the respondent-Corporate Debtor at their registered office constitutes valid service of the statutory…
-
Electrosteel Steel Limited (Now M/S Esl Steel Limited) v. Ispat Carrier Private Limited
Whether upon approval of the resolution plan by the NCLT, the claim of the respondent being outside the purview of the resolution plan stood extinguished; whether the arbitral award dated 06.07.2018 was capable of being…
-
A. Rajendra v. Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao & Ors.
Whether the limitation to file an appeal under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code starts from the date of pronouncement of the order or from the date when the order is communicated to the parties.
-
Finance Corporation Limited) v. 63 Moons Technologies Limited & Others
Whether Resolution Plan-RP approved by Committee of Creditors-CoC and NCLT was in contravention of provisions of any law requiring NCLAT to exercise its jurisdiction u/s.61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016;…
-
Independent Sugar Corporation Ltd. v. Girish Sriram Juneja & Ors.
Whether the approval of a proposed combination by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) must mandatorily precede the approval of the Resolution Plan, by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), as stipulated under the…
-
Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions
The appellant-NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority filed a claim of INR 06.29 Crores which was admitted by the Respondent No.01-Resolution Professional. The NCLT vide order dated 05.10.2020, granted only INR 50 Lakhs…
-
GLAS Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran & Ors.
Whether the appellant, who was not a party to the settlement between the second respondent-BCCI (Operational Creditor) and the Corporate Debtor, has locus in the proceedings before this Court; whether the NCLAT erred in…
-
State Bank of India v. India Power Corporation Limited
The issue which arises for consideration is the interpretation of Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLT Rules) and Rule 22 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLAT…
-
V.S. Palanivel v. P. Sriram, CS, Liquidator, Etc.
(i) Whether the Tribunal was right in accepting the view taken by the Adjudicating Authority that Covid-19 lockdown was a valid reason for extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; (ii) Whether the…
-
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority v. Prabhjit Singh Soni & Anr.
Whether in exercise of powers under s.60(5), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Adjudicating Authority-NCLT can recall an order of approval passed under s.31(1) of the IBC; whether the application for recall of…
-
Sanjay Pandurang Kalate v. Vistra Itcl (India)
Whether appeal instituted before the NCLAT was within limitation. In its impugned order, the NCLAT concluded that the appeal was barred by limitation on the ground that it was instituted beyond the outer limit of 45…
-
Axis Bank Limited v. Naren Sheth & Anr.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant upholding the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority whereby it admitted the application u/s.7, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by Respondent No.2-Secured…
-
M/S. Rps Infrastructure Ltd. v. Mukul Kumar & Anr.
Whether the commercial entity’s claim pertaining to an arbitral award, in appeal u/s. 37 of the Arbit ration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is liable to be included at a belated stage-after the resolution plan approved by…
- M. K. Rajagopalan v. Dr. Periasamy Palani
- Sanket Kumar Agarwal & Anr v. Apg Logistics Pvt.
- Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka v. Tourism
- Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. and Anr.
- M/S Tech Sharp Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanghvi Movers Limited
- State Tax Officer (1) v. Rainbow Papers Limited
- K. Paramasivam v. The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. & Anr.
- Sundaresh Bhatt, Liquidator of Abg Shipyard v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr.
- Ngaitlang Dhar v. Panna Pragati Infrastructure Private Limited & Ors.
- V Nagarajan v. Sks Ispat and Power Ltd.& Ors.
- National Spot Exchange Limited v. Mr. Anil Kohli, Resolution Professional for Dunar Foods Limited
- Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited & Anr.
- Dena Bank (Now Bank of Baroda) v. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr.
- M/S Orator Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Samtex Desinz Pvt. Ltd.
- Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association & Ors. v. Nbcc (India) Ltd. & Ors.
- Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
- Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Mr. Amit Gupta & Ors.
- Committee of Creditors of Amtek Auto Limited Through Corporation Bank v. Dinkar T Venkatasubramanian & Ors.
- Phoenix Arc Private Limited v. Spade Financial Services Limited & Ors.
- M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd.V. State of Karnataka & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors