Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. · Chapter II: Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Section 9: Application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by operational creditor
(1) After the expiry of the period of ten days from the date of delivery of the notice or invoice demanding payment under sub-section (1) of section 8, if the operational creditor does not receive payment from the corporate debtor or notice of the dispute under sub-section (2) of section 8, the operational creditor may file an application before the Adjudicating Authority for initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process.
(2) The application under sub-section (1) shall be filed in such form and manner and accompanied with such fee as may be prescribed.
(3) The operational creditor shall, along with the application furnish—
(a) a copy of the invoice demanding payment or demand notice delivered by the operational creditor to the corporate debtor;
(b) an affidavit to the effect that there is no notice given by the corporate debtor relating to a dispute of the unpaid operational debt;
(c) a copy of the certificate from the financial institutions maintaining accounts of the operational creditor confirming that there is no payment of an unpaid operational debt [by the corporate debtor; if available;]
[(d) a copy of any record with information utility confirming that there is no payment of an unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor, if available; and
(e) any other proof confirming that there is no payment of an unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor or such other information, as may be prescribed.]
(4) An operational creditor initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process under this section, may propose a resolution professional to act as an interim resolution professional.
(5) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the application under sub-section (2), by an order
(i) admit the application and communicate such decision to the operational creditor and the corporate debtor if,—
(a) the application made under sub-section (2) is complete;
(b) there is no [payment] of the unpaid operational debt;
(c) the invoice or notice for payment to the corporate debtor has been delivered by the operational creditor;
(d) no notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is no record of dispute in the information utility; and
(e) there is no disciplinary proceeding pending against any resolution professional proposed under sub-section (4), if any;
(ii) reject the application and communicate such decision to the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, if—
(a) the application made under sub-section (2) is incomplete;
(b) there has been [payment] of the unpaid operational debt;
(c) the creditor has not delivered the invoice or notice for payment to the corporate debtor;
(d) notice of dispute has been received by the operational creditor or there is a record of dispute in the information utility; or
(e) any disciplinary proceeding is pending against any proposed resolution professional:
Provided that Adjudicating Authority, shall before rejecting an application under sub-clause (a) of clause (ii) give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of the date of receipt of such notice from the Adjudicating Authority.
(6) The corporate insolvency resolution process shall commence from the date of admission of the application under sub-section (5) of this section.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 12 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 9
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the…
-
Visa Coke Limited v. M/s Mesco Kalinga Steel Limited
Issue arose whether the notice served by the appellant-Operational Creditor upon the Key Managerial Personnel-KMP of the respondent-Corporate Debtor at their registered office constitutes valid service of the statutory…
-
Rajan Chadha & Anr. v. Sanjay Arora
When one Judge of the same Court has taken a particular view holding the respondent to be guilty of contempt, whether another Judge could have come to a finding that the respondent was not guilty of contempt.
-
Rakesh Bhanot v. M/s. Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd.
Issue arose whether the proceedings initiated against the appellants u/s.138 rw s.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be stayed in view of the interim moratorium u/s.96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,…
-
Goqii Technologies Private Limited v. Sokrati Technologies Private Limited
Issue arose, as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the appellant’s application u/s.11 of the Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes and claims in terms of…
-
M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. M/s Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad
(i) Whether a fresh application u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent could be said to be maintainable more particularly when no liberty to file a fresh application was granted…
-
GLAS Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran & Ors.
Whether the appellant, who was not a party to the settlement between the second respondent-BCCI (Operational Creditor) and the Corporate Debtor, has locus in the proceedings before this Court; whether the NCLAT erred in…
-
Vidyasagar Prasad v. UCO Bank & Anr.
Whether specific and clear acknowledgement of debt by the Corporate Debtor in its balance sheet is necessary while considering limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
-
V.S. Palanivel v. P. Sriram, CS, Liquidator, Etc.
(i) Whether the Tribunal was right in accepting the view taken by the Adjudicating Authority that Covid-19 lockdown was a valid reason for extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; (ii) Whether the…
-
Dilip B Jiwrajka v. Union of India & Ors
Constitutional validity of ss.95 to 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
- Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki Ppl Ltd. & Anr.
- Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka v. Tourism
- Sabarmati Gas Limited v. Shah Alloys Limited
- Rajratan Babulal Agarwal v. Solartex India Pvt. Ltd.& Ors.
- Ashok G. Rajani v. Beacon Trusteeship Ltd. & Ors
- M/S Tech Sharp Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanghvi Movers Limited
- Punjab National Bank v. Mr. Vijay Sitaram Dandnaik & Anr.
- Sundaresh Bhatt, Liquidator of Abg Shipyard v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Kew Precision Parts Private Limited & Ors.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Tulip Star Hotels Limited & Ors.
- M/S S.S. Engineers v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
- Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr.
- M/S Wizaman Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Kedrion Biopharma Inc.
- M/S Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. M/S Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited
- Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v. Antrix Corporation Ltd. & Anr
- M/S. Jai Balaji Industries v. D.K. Mohanty & Anr.
- Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited & Anr.
- Anjali Rathi and Others v. Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others
- Kay Bouvet Engineering Ltd. v. Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Private Limited
- Dena Bank (Now Bank of Baroda) v. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr.
- Small Scale Industrial Manufactures Association (Regd.) v. Union of India and Others
- Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
- Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Mr. Amit Gupta & Ors.
- N. Subramanian v. M/S Aruna Hotels Ltd. & Anr.
- A. Navinchandra Steels Private Limited v. Srei Equipment Finance Limited & Ors.
- P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- Ramesh Kymal v. M/S Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Pvt. Ltd.
- Phoenix Arc Private Limited v. Spade Financial Services Limited & Ors.
- M/S. Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. v. M/S Hotel Poonja International Pvt. Ltd.
- M/S. Radha Exports (India) Pvt. Limited v. K.P. Jayaram & Anr.
- Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited Through Authorised Signatory v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors.
- Duncans Industries Ltd. v. A. J. Agrochem
- Reliance Communication Limited & Ors. v. State Bank of India & Ors.
- Forech India Ltd. v. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
- Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited v. Equipment Conductors and Cables Limited
- Macquarie Bank Limited v. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd.
- M/S. Surendra Trading Company v. M/S. Juggilal Kamlapat Jute Mills Company Limited And. Others