Limitation Act, 1963 · Chapter I: Preliminary
Section 2: Definitions
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) "applicant" includes—
(i) a petitioner;
(ii) any person from or through whom an applicant derives his right to apply;
(iii) any person whose estate is represented by the applicant as executor, administrator or other representative;
(b) "application" includes a petition;
(c) "bill of exchange" includes a hundi and a cheque;
(d) "bond" includes any instrument whereby a person obliges himself to pay money to another, on condition that the obligation shall be void if a specified act is performed, or is not performed, as the case may be;
(e) "defendant" includes—
(i) any person from or through whom a defendant derives his liability to be sued;
(ii) any person whose estate is represented by the defendant as executor, administrator or other representative;
(f) "easement" includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove and appropriate for his own profit any part of the soil belonging to another or anything growing in, or attached to, or subsisting upon, the land of another;
(g) "foreign country" means any country other than India;
(h) "good faith"—nothing shall be deemed to be done in good faith which is not done with due care and attention;
(i) "plaintiff" includes—
(i) any person from or through whom a plaintiff derives his right to sue;
(ii) any person whose estate is represented by the plaintiff as executor, administrator or other representative;
(j) "period of limitation" means the period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by the Schedule, and "prescribed period" means the period of limitation computed in accordance with the provisions of this Act;
(k) "promissory note" means any instrument whereby the maker engages absolutely to pay a specified sum of money to another at a time therein limited, or on demand, or at sight;
(l) "suit" does not include an appeal or an application;
(m) "tort" means a civil wrong which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of a trust;
(n) "trustee" does not include a benamidar, a mortgagee remaining in possession after the mortgage has been satisfied or a person in wrongful possession without title.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 2
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the…
-
My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to…
-
M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. M/s Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad
(i) Whether a fresh application u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent could be said to be maintainable more particularly when no liberty to file a fresh application was granted…
-
Opg Power Generation Private Limited v. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India, or/and is vitiated by patent illegality appearing on the face of the award; whether the holding company could have been…
-
Mohd Abaad Ali & Anr. v. Directorate of Revenue
Whether benefit of s.5 r/w. ss. 2 and 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be availed in an appeal against acquittal.
- Bhimashankar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita v. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. (Wil)
- Amazon.Com Nv Investment Holdings Llc v. Future Retail Limited & Ors.
- Kalpraj Dharamshi & Anr. v. Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd. & Anr.
- Sagufa Ahmed & Ors. v. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
- Government of India v. 1.Vedanta Limited (Formerly Cairn India Ltd.) 2. Ravva Oil (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. 3. Videocon Industries Limited
- Ganesan Rep by Its Power Agent G. Rukmani Ganesan v. The Commissioner, the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board & Ors.
- M/S. Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. Assam State Electricity Board & Ors.
- M/S. Suryachakra Power Corporation Limited v. Electricity Department, Rep. by Its Superintending Engineer, Port Blair and Others
- M.P. Steel Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise
- Assam Urban Water Supply & Sew. Board v. Subash Projects & Marketing Ltd.
- J. Kumaradasan Nair & Anr. v. Iric Sohan & Ors.
- Ajay G. Podar v. Official Liquidator of J.S. & W.M. and Ors.
- M/S Consolidated Engg. Enterprises v. Principal Secy. Irrigation Deptt. & Ors.
- Assistant Commissioner Anti Evasion Commercial Taxes, Bharatpur v. M/S. Amtek Indla Limited
- Gopal Sardar v. Karuna Sardar
- Mr. France B. Martins and Anr. v. Mrs. Mafaida Maria Teresa Rodrigues
- Patel Naranbhai Marghabhai and Ors. v. Deceased Dhulabhai Galbabhai and Ors.