Limitation Act, 1963 · Chapter II: Limitation of Suits, Appeals and Applications
Section 5: Extension of prescribed period in certain cases
Any appeal or any application, other than an application under any of the provisions of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), may be admitted after the prescribed period if the appellant or the applicant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period.
Explanation.—The fact that the appellant or the applicant was misled by any order, practice or judgment of the High Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause within the meaning of this section.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 15 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 5
-
Sri R Raghu v. Sri G M Krishna & Anr.
The appellant has preferred Civil Appeal No.8544 of 2024 aggrieved by the two directions given by the High Court in the impugned order relating to additional payment of Rs.25 lakhs per acre to the respondent as…
-
Seventh Day Adventist Senior Secondary School v. Ismat Ahmed and Others
Whether applications filed u/ss.7(1) and (2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 by the tenant without deposit of rent after lapse of statutory period of thirty days, along with an application u/s.5 of the…
-
Binod Pathak & Ors. v. Shankar Choudhary & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court that as some of the defendants before the first appellate court had passed away and their legal heirs were not brought on record in accordance…
-
Thirunagalingam v. Lingeswaran & Anr.
An appeal suit along with the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days was preferred. The High Court allowed the application for condonation of delay of 1116 days. Whether the delay is to be condoned or not,…
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the…
-
Santosh Devi v. Sunder
Whether the High Court rightly dismissed the second appeal filed by the petitioner herein (plaintiff) affirming the judgment passed by the First Appellate Court which had upheld the decree passed by the trial court…
-
Kanchhu v. Prakash Chand & Ors.
Matter pertains to sustainability of the order passed by the High Court allowing writ petition u/Art.227 of the Constitution and allowing multiple interlocutory applications-application for condonation of delay in…
-
Jharkhand Urja Utpadan Nigam Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The High Court rejected the Interim Application No. 11269 of 2024 filed by the petitioner herein u/s.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and thereby declined to condone the delay of 301 days in filing the main appeal…
-
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Gopu & Anr.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court enhancing the compensation awarded to the claimants under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
-
Inder Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the High Court was justified in condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal.
-
Ram Lal v. Jarnail Singh (Now Deceased) through its LRs & Ors.
Suit filed by appellant seeking specific performance of contract based on an agreement of sale executed by respondents was allowed on 20-01-2012 and appellant was directed to deposit the balance sale consideration…
-
Om Prakash Gupta Alias Lalloowa (Now Deceased) & Ors. v. Satish Chandra (Now Deceased)
The issues before the Hon’ble Court were as to whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the application for condonation of delay in filing the application for substitution and could the second appeal be…
-
My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to…
-
Dwarika Prasad (D) Thr. LRs. v. Prithvi Raj Singh
Whether a separate application for condonation of delay is mandatory in cases where sufficient justification was provided while seeking restoration against ex-parte decree.
-
M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. M/s Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad
(i) Whether a fresh application u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent could be said to be maintainable more particularly when no liberty to file a fresh application was granted…
-
Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmukh v. Asap Fluids Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes and claims in terms of the Shareholders Agreement between the parties. Whether the reference under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration &…
-
Vidyasagar Prasad v. UCO Bank & Anr.
Whether specific and clear acknowledgement of debt by the Corporate Debtor in its balance sheet is necessary while considering limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
-
IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus
Issue arose as regards the constitutional validity of s.6A of the Citizenship Act; does s.6A offend preambular values like fraternity; s.6A, if ultra vires Part II of the Constitution; does s.6A create an unreasonable…
-
The State of West Bengal Represented Through the Secretary & Ors. v. Rajpath Contractors and Engineers Ltd.
Issue arose as regards correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition u/s. 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, holding that it was not filed within the period specified under…
-
Delhi Development Authority v. Tejpal & Ors.
Whether the appellants made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay on the grounds of subsequent change of law brought in by Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra [2018] 2 SCR 1 and Indore Development…
-
Department & Another v. M/s K.L. Rathi Steels Limited and Others
Issue arose to resolve as to which of the two views on maintainability of the Review petitions-Hon’ble Judge presiding over the Bench ruling in favour of maintainability of the review petitions whereas the Hon’ble…
-
Shri Mallikarjun Devasthan, Shelgi v. Subhash Mallikarjun Birajdar and Others
Whether delay in submitting Change Report to record name in register maintained u/s 7 Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 (1950 Act) in relation to the Vahiwatdar (Administrator) of a Public Trust, can be condoned.…
-
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Satish Jain (Dead) by Lrs & Ors.
Issue arose that when there is an agreement based on ex-parte decree, and the ex-parte decree having been set aside, parties if could rely upon the agreement.
-
K.B. Lal (Krishna Bahadur Lal) v. Gyanendra Pratap & Ors.
Whether there was sufficient cause for delay of fourteen years in filing an application under Order IX, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
-
Pathapati Subba Reddy (Died) by L.Rs. & Ors. v. The Special Deputy Collector (La)
Whether the High Court was justified in refusing to condone the delay of 5659 days in filing the proposed appeal against the judgment of the reference court under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by some of the Legal…
-
Union of India & Anr. v. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy (D) Through His Lr
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned order by which it declined to condone the delay of 12 years and 158 days in filing the restoration application by appellants-Union of India for…
-
M/S Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. M/S Aptech Ltd.
Whether the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to an application for appointment of arbitrator u/s.11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; if yes, whether the present petition is barred by limitation; when does…
-
Mohd Abaad Ali & Anr. v. Directorate of Revenue
Whether benefit of s.5 r/w. ss. 2 and 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be availed in an appeal against acquittal.
-
M/S North Eastern Chemicals Industries (P) Ltd. & Anr v. M/S Ashok Paper Mill (Assam) Ltd. & Anr.
Whether Article 116 of the Limitation Act 1963, applies to proceedings under the Jogighopa (Assam) Unit of Ashok Paper Mills Limited (Acquisition Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1990 and; if the Limitation Act does not…
-
Housing Society v. Ameena Begum & Another
Application filed by the Respondent seeking condonation of delay in filing the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree was dismissed by Trial Court. Consequently, the petition filed under Order IX Rule 13 CPC seeking…
-
Debasish Paul & Anr. v. Amal Boral
Whether the High Court was justified in directing the trial court to dispose of the application filed by the tenant u/s. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, when the trial court had already rejected the application filed by…
- Sheo Raj Singh (Deceased) Through Lrs. & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Ltd. v. Kumaon Entertainment and Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd.
-
Axis Bank Limited v. Naren Sheth & Anr.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant upholding the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority whereby it admitted the application u/s.7, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by Respondent No.2-Secured…
- Raheem Shah & Anr v. Govind Singh & Ors.
- M/S B and T Ag v. Ministry of Defence
- Bhasker & Anr. v. Ayodhya Jewellers
- Bhimashankar Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita v. Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. (Wil)
- Shyam Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Shubham Jain
- Ajay Dabra v. Pyare Ram & Ors.
- Sabarmati Gas Limited v. Shah Alloys Limited
- Manharlal Shivlal Panchal & Others v. The Deputy Collector & Special Land Acquisition Officer & Others
- M/S Tech Sharp Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanghvi Movers Limited
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Kew Precision Parts Private Limited & Ors.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Tulip Star Hotels Limited & Ors.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr.
- Sudhir Ranjan Patra (Dead) Thr. Lrs. & Anr. v. Himansu Sekhar Srichandan & Ors.
- Abdul Matin Mallick v. Subrata Bhattacharjee (Banerjee) and Ors.
- State Bank of India v. Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited
- M/S Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. M/S Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited
- N. Rajendran v. S. Valli
- Sunil Kumar Maity v. State Bank of India and Anr.
- Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd v. Maheshbhai Tinabhai Rathod & Ors.
- Avneesh Chandan Gadgil & Anr. v. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors.
- National Spot Exchange Limited v. Mr. Anil Kohli, Resolution Professional for Dunar Foods Limited
- Amazon.Com Nv Investment Holdings Llc v. Future Retail Limited & Ors.
- Dena Bank (Now Bank of Baroda) v. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr.
- K. P. Natarajan & Anr. v. Muthalammal & Ors.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr.
- Laxmi Pat Surana v. Union Bank of India & Anr.
- Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
- Government of Maharashtra (Water Resources Department) Represented by Executive Engineer v. M/S Borse Brothers Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
- Kalpraj Dharamshi & Anr. v. Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd. & Anr.
- Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd.
- Subodh Kumar v. Shamim Ahmed
- Sridevi Datla v. Union of India and Ors.
- Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. M/S Navigant Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
- Chintels India Ltd. v. Bhayana Builders Pvt. Ltd.
- Manish Kumar v. Union of India and Another
- Government of India v. 1.Vedanta Limited (Formerly Cairn India Ltd.) 2. Ravva Oil (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. 3. Videocon Industries Limited
- M/S. Radha Exports (India) Pvt. Limited v. K.P. Jayaram & Anr.
- Babulal Vardharji Gurjar v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
- Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr. v. National Insurance Company
- Kavita Kanwar v. Mrs. Pamela Mehta & Ors.
- Commissioner (Ct) Ltu Kakinada & Ors. v. M/S. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited
- K. Virupaksha & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
- Sukhwinder Singh v. Jagroop Singh & Anr.
- Standard Chartered Bank v. Mstc Limited
- N. Mohan v. R. Madhu
- Superintending Engineer/ Dehar Power House Circle Bhakra Beas Management Board (Pw) Slapper & Another v. Excise and Taxation Officer, Sunder Nagar/ Assessing Authority
- Bijay Kumar Singh & Others v. Amit Kumar Chamariya & Anr.
- Barasat Eye Hospital & Ors. v. Kaustabh Mondal
- Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S Tejparas Associates Exports Pvt. Ltd.
- Jignesh Shah & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- M/S Geo Miller & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Chairman, Rajasthan Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd.
- Vashdeo R Bhojwani v. Abhyudaya Co-Operative Bank Ltd & Anr.
- State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. v. B. Ranga Reddy (D) by Lrs & Ors.
- Bhivchandra Shankar More v. Balu Gangaram More & Ors.
- Ganesan Rep by Its Power Agent G. Rukmani Ganesan v. The Commissioner, the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board & Ors.
- Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority & Anr. v. Gopi Chand Atreja
- High Court of Tripura Through the Registrar General v. Tirtha Sarathi Mukherjee & Ors.
- M/S Simplex Infrastructure Ltd v. Union of India
- B.K. Educational Services Private Limited v. Parag Gupta and Associates
- Mohd. Sahid and Others v. Raziya Khanam (D) Thr. Lrs. and Another
- P. Radha Bai and Ors. v. P. Ashok Kumar and Anr.
- Suman Devi v. Manisha Devi and Ors.
- Ummer v. Pottengal Subida & Ors.
- Life Insurance Corporation of v. Nandini J. Shah & Ors
- Bengal Chemists & Druggists Assn. v. Kalyan Chowdhury
- International Asset Reconstruction Company of A India Ltd v. The Official Liquidator of Aldrich Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Others