Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 · Chapter V: Procedure
Section 54: Presumption from possession of illicit articles
In trials under this Act, it may be presumed, unless and until the contrary is proved, that the accused has committed an offence under this Act in respect of—
(a) any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance;
(b) any opium poppy, cannabis plant or coca plant growing on any land which he has cultivated;
(c) any apparatus specially designed or any group of utensils specially adopted for the manufacture of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance; or
(d) any materials which have undergone any process towards the manufacture of a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance, or any residue left of the materials from which any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance has been manufactured,
for the possession of which he fails to account satisfactorily.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 54
-
Manoj Tejraj Jain v. State of Gujarat
Challenge to the judgment of the High Court whereby the appeals filed by the appellants herein were dismissed against the judgment of the trial court convicting them for offences u/ss.25A and 29, Narcotic Drugs and…
-
Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the High Court erred in upholding the judgment of the trial court, thereby upholding the appellant guilty of conscious possession of poppy husk.
-
Bharat Aambale v. The State of Chhattisgarh
Appellant had been convicted by the Courts below under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The issue was whether the conviction could be said to have been vitiated because of…
- Rajinder Kumar v. Ncb
- Mohd.Altaf v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Syed Abu Ala v. Ncb
-
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kashif
Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
-
Md. Rahim Ali @ Abdur Rahim v. The State of Assam & Ors.
The Foreigners Tribunal, Nalbari declared the appellant to be a foreigner on the grounds that he failed to discharge his burden under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946.
-
Smt. Najmunisha v. The State of Gujarat
As per the prosecution, secret information was received by PW-2 (Intelligence Officer/Inspector) as to Accused No. 4 (husband of Accused No.1) carrying contraband from a particular route in an auto rickshaw. Said secret…
-
Balwinder Singh (Binda) v. The Narcotics
Matter pertains to admissibility in evidence of the confessional statement recorded by the Narcotics Control Bure au officers u/s. 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; and proving of possession of…
- Sarvothaman Guhan @Sarvo v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Dixita Golwala v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Deep Chand Kumar v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Masibur Khan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
- Quentin Decon v. Customs
- Gauri Shankar Jaiswal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Shankar Kumar Sinha v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Ashish Mittal v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
- Galiv Hussain v. State Gnct of Delhi
- Abdul Hamid Turkman v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Harveer Giri v. State
- Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Pappu v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Union of India Through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow v. Md. Nawaz Khan
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Jeet Ram v. The Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh
- Mukesh Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi)
- Mohanlal v. The State of Punjab
- Naresh Kumar Alias Nitu v. State of Hlmachal Pradesh
- State of Rajasthan v. Jag Raj Singh @ Hansa
- Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan
- Gian Chand & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- Iqbal Moosa Patel v. State of Gujarat
- Noor Aga v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- Ahmed v. State of Gujarat
- Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyed and Ors. v. The State of Gujarat