Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 · Chapter III: Prohibition, Control and Regulation
Section 8: Prohibition of certain operations
No person shall—
(a) cultivate any coca plant or gather any portion of coca plant; or
(b) cultivate the opium poppy or any cannabis plant; or
(c) produce, manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport, warehouse, use, consume, import inter-State, export inter-State, import into India, export from India or tranship any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, except for medical or scientific purposes and in the manner and to the extent provided by the provisions of this Act or the rules or orders made thereunder and in a case where any such provision, imposes any requirement by way of licence, permit or authorisation also in accordance with the terms and conditions of such licence, permit or authorisation:
Provided that, and subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the prohibition against the cultivation of the cannabis plant for the production of ganja or the production, possession, use, consumption, purchase, sale, transport, warehousing, import inter-State and export inter-State of ganja for any purpose other than medical and scientific purpose shall take effect only from the date which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf:
[Provided further that nothing in this section shall apply to the export of poppy straw for decorative purposes.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 8
-
Khursheed Ahmad Chohan v. Union of Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. Etc.
Issue arose as to whether the facts and circumstances disclosed in the complaint, supported by compelling medical evidence of grievous injuries, including complete genital mutilation, mandatorily required registration…
-
Narayan Das v. State of Chhattisgarh
Issue arose as regards the interpretation of s.32-B of the NDPS Act by the High Court that u/s.32-B minimum punishment is considered as maximum punishment.
-
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Raj Kumar Arora & Ors.
Issue arose whether an offence u/s.8(c) of the NDPS Act could be said to have been made out when an accused “deals with” psychotropic substances mentioned in the Schedule to the NDPS Act but not figuring in Schedule I…
-
Union of India Thr. I.O. Narcotics Control Bureau v. Man Singh Verma
Issue arose whether the contours of s.439 CrPC permit the grant of compensation by the High Court to the appellant for alleged wrongful confinement for four months in a matter of possession of narcotic substances.
-
Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether the High Court erred in upholding the judgment of the trial court, thereby upholding the appellant guilty of conscious possession of poppy husk.
- Syed Abu Ala v. Ncb
- Mohd.Altaf v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Rajinder Kumar v. Ncb
-
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kashif
Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
- Angelina Hrang Than Sangi v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
- Amritpal Singh v. National Investigation Agency
- Raj Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
- Pauline Nalwoga v. Customs
- Aslam Noorudheen v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Girish Bharti v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Raja Jaswant Singh v. Union of India & Ors
- Amardeep Singh Narang v. Union of India & Ors
- Pradeep Kumar Srivastava v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Allah Noor v. Narcotics Control Bureu
- Ritah Kyolaba v. Customs
- Umar Sebandeke v. Customs
- Tushar Chaudhary v. State NCT of Delhi
- Raaz Ali v. Narcotics Control Bureau
-
Frank Vitus v. Narcotics Control Bureau & Ors.
The appellant was ordered to be enlarged on bail subject to various terms and conditions incorporated in the said order. The petitioner is aggrieved by the two conditions imposed while granting bail. The two conditions…
- Pradeep Mandal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Shradha Surana v. Narcotics Control Bureau & Anr. & Anr
- Bharat Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics
- Abdul Qaider v. Narcotic Control Bureau
- Arun Kumar @ Varun v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Rajender Prasad Sharma v. Ncb
- Gilbert Apeh Emeka v. Narcotic Control Bureau
- Iliyas Khan v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Tobias Christian v. Narcotic Control Bureau
- Gurmail Singh @ Gela v. Narcotics Control Bureau (Ncb)
- Habibullah Nabi Zada v. N.C.B
- Naushad Ali Through Perokar Sahajad Ali v. UOI & Ors
- Vinod Nagar v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Mansher v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi Through Its Station House Officer Police Station Crime Branch Delhi
- Lokesh Dhingra v. The State of N.C.T. of Delhi Through Its Station House Officer Police Station Crime Branch New Delhi
- Somdutt Singh @ Shivam v. Ncb
- Somdut T Singh Alias Shivam v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Kashmir Aliash Mausam v. Ncb of Delhi
- Gaurav Mehta v. Narcotics Control Bureau
-
Balwinder Singh (Binda) v. The Narcotics
Matter pertains to admissibility in evidence of the confessional statement recorded by the Narcotics Control Bure au officers u/s. 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; and proving of possession of…
- Sarvothaman Guhan @Sarvo v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Sheetal Sharma & Anr v. State NCT of Delhi
- Dixita Golwala v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Rajdeep Chowdhary v. Union of India and Ors
- Mangilal v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Quentin Decon v. Customs
- Vipin Mittal v. National Investigating Agency
- Shankar Kumar Sinha v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Gajendra Singh@Gajender Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Tamir Ali v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Kashif v. Narcotic Control Bureau
- Emmanuel William v. Narcotics Control Bureau
- Manish Mohan v. I.O. N.C.B Through Counsel
- Vinay Kumar Mishra v. Central Bureau of Narcotics
- Narcotics Control Bureau v. Mohit Aggarwal
- Kallu Khan v. State of Rajasthan
- Mohd Zahid v. State Through Ncb
- Union of India Through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow v. Md. Nawaz Khan
- Union of India v. Prateek Shukla
- State of Rajasthan v. Sahi Ram
- Mohammed Fasrin v. State Rep. by the Intelligence Officer
- Vijay Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Rafiq Qureshi v. Narcotic Control Bureau Eastern Zonal Unit
- State of Punjab v. Rakesh Kumar
- Union of India v. Jarooparam
- Hira Singh & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Girish Raghunath Mehta v. Inspector of Customs and Another
- State of Rajasthan v. Jag Raj Singh @ Hansa
- State Through Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau v. Mushtaq Ahmad Etc.
- State of Rajasthan v. Jainudeen Shekhandanr.
- Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P and Another
- Union of India & Another v. Sanjeev v. Deshpande
- Vijay Jain v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- State of Rajasthan v. Bheru Lal
- K.S. Panduranga v. State of Karnataka
- Ashok Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan
- Suresh & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- The State of Maharashtra v. Vishwanath Maranna Shetty
- Shahejadkhan Mahebubkhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat
- Ashok @ Dangra Jaiswal v. State of M.P.
- Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab
- Central Bureau of Narcotics v. Bahadur Singh
- Sarju@ Ramu v. State of U.P.
- State of Rajasthan v. Bhiya Ram
- State of Rajasthan v. Daul@ Daulat Giri
- Inspector of Customs, Akhnoor J & K v. Yash Pal and Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Lal & Anr.
- Jitendra Panchal v. Intelligence Officer, Ncb & Anr.
- Union of India v. Rattan Mallik @ Habul
- Hamidbhai Azambhai Malik v. State of Gujarat
- The Superintendent, Narcotic Control Bureau v. Parash Singh
- Man Singh & Anr. v. State of M.P.
- N.R. Mon v. Md. Nasimuddin
- State of Rajasthan v. Udai Lal
- E. Micheal Raj v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau
- Kanhaiyalal v. Union of India and Ors.