Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
Section 4: Payment of gratuity
The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 was repealed and replaced by the Code on Social Security, 2020 from 21 November 2025. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
(1) Gratuity shall be payable to an employee on the termination of his employment after he has rendered continuous service for not less than five years,—
(a) on his superannuation, or
(b) on his retirement or resignation, or
(c) on his death or disablement due to accident or disease:
Provided that the completion of continuous service of five years shall not be necessary where the termination of the employment of any employee is due to death or disablement: [Provided further that in the case of death of the employee, gratuity payable to him shall be paid to his nominee or, if no nomination has been made, to his heirs, and where any such nominees or heirs is a minor, the share of such minor, shall be deposited with the controlling authority who shall invest the same for the benefit of such minor in such bank or other financial institution, as may be prescribed, until such minor attains majority.]
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, disablement means such disablement as incapacitates an employee for the work which he was capable of performing before the accident or disease resulting in such disablement.
(2) For every completed year of service or part thereof in excess of six months, the employer shall pay gratuity to an employee at the rate of fifteen days’ wages based on the rate of wages last drawn by the employee concerned:
Provided that in the case of a piece-rated employee, daily wages shall be computed on the average of the total wages received by him for a period of three months immediately preceding the termination of his employment, and, for this purpose, the wages paid for any overtime work shall not be taken into account:
Provided further that in the case of [an employee who is employed in a seasonal establishment and who is not so employed throughout the year], the employer shall pay the gratuity at the rate of seven days’ wages for each season. [Explanation.—In the case of a monthly rated employee, the fifteen days’ wages shall be calculated by dividing the monthly rate of wages last drawn by him by twenty-six and multiplying the quotient by fifteen.]
(3) The amount of gratuity payable to an employee shall not exceed [ [such amount as may be notified by the Central Government from time to time] ].
(4) For the purpose of computing the gratuity payable to an employee who is employed, after his disablement, on reduced wages, his wages for the period preceding his disablement shall be taken to be the wages received by him during that period, and his wages for the period subsequent to his disablement shall be taken to be the wages as so reduced.
(5) Nothing in this section shall affect the right of an employee receive better terms of gratuity under any award or agreement or contract with the employer.
(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1),—
(a) the gratuity of an employee, whose services have been terminated for any act, wilful omission or negligence causing any damage or loss to, or destruction of, property belonging to the employer, shall be forfeited to the extent of the damage or loss so caused;
(b) the gratuity payable to an employee [may be wholly or partially forfeited]—
(i) if the services of such employee have been terminated for his riotous or disorderly conduct or any other act violence on his part, or
(ii) if the services of such employee have been terminated for any act which constitutes an offence involving moral turpitude, provided that such offence is committed by him in the course of his employment. * * * * *
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 4
-
Ashok Kumar Dabas (Dead Through Legal Heirs) v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The High Court has upheld the orders passed by the Tribunal by which the claim of the predecessors-in-interest of the appellant, for release of the pensionary benefits of the deceased employee, was declined.
-
Western Coal Fields Ltd. v. Manohar Govinda Fulzele & Anr.
Whether forfeiture of gratuity is permissible in the event of termination of service on misconduct, which can be categorised as an act constituting an offence involving moral turpitude; without there being any…
- Malvinder Kuar v. Director of Director of Education & Ors
- Punjab National Bank v. Sh Niraj Gupta & Anr
- Nitin Kumar v. M/S Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd
- Tv Today Network Ltd v. Ankita Sodhi and Anr
- Dr. Abhay Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India and Anr
-
Jyotirmay Ray v. The Field General Manager, Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Whether the denial of employer’s contribution of Provident Fund and non-payment of gratuity to the employee-appellant because of the order of compulsory retirement, as directed by the impugned order, is justified.…
- Shanti Swaroop v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board Through Its Chief Executive Officer
- Suresh Puri v. State Bank of India & Ors
- The Secretary, Local Self Government Department & Ors. Etc. v. K. Chandran Etc.
- Krishna Gopal Tiwary & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Mahanadi Coalfields Limited v. Sri Rabindranath Choubey
- Union Bank of India and Others v. C.G. Ajay Babu and Another
- Ch. Cum Man. Director Mahanadi Coalfield Ltd. v. Rabindranath Choubey
- Y.K. Singla v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
- P. Rajan Sandhi v. Union of India
- Guru Jambheshwar University, Hisar v. Dharam Pal
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata v. M/S. Hoogl Y Mills Co. Ltd.
- Jaswant Singh Gill v. M/S. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ors.
- Management of Ksrtc Th. Chief Law Officer v. R. Krishna Reddy
- Rajasthan Welfare Society v. State of Rajasthan
- T.I. Cycles of India, Ambattur v. M.K. Gurumani and Ors.
- D.T.C. Retired Employees' Association and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Delhi Transport Corporation, Etc.
- Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh v. National Textile Corporation (South Maharashtra) Ltd. and Ors.
- Aspinwal and Co., Kulshekar, Mangalore v. Laitha Padugady and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Bakshish Singh v. M/S Darshan Engineering Works & Ors.
- Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd Etc. Etc. v. The Appellate Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Workmen of Metro Theatre Ltd., Bombay v. Metro Theatre Ltd., Bombay
- Shri Digvijay Woollen Mills Ltd. Etc. v. Mahendra Prataprai Buch Etc.