Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 · Chapter VII: Special Courts
Section 45: Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable
(1) [Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), no person accused of an offence [under this Act] shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless—]
(i) the Public Prosecutor has been given a opportunity to oppose the application for such release; and
(ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail:
Provided that a person, who, is under the age of sixteen years, or is a woman or is sick or infirm, [or is accused either on his own or along with other co-accused of money-laundering a sum of less than one crore rupees] may be released on bail, if the Special Court so directs:
Provided further that the Special Court shall not take cognizance of any offence punishable under section 4 except upon a complaint in writing made by—
(i) the Director; or
(ii) any officer of the Central Government or a State Government authorised in writing in this behalf by the Central Government by a general or special order made in this behalf by that Government.
[(1A) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), or any other provision of this Act, no police officer shall investigate into an offence under this Act unless specifically authorised, by the Central Government by a general or special order, and, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.]
(2) The limitation on granting of bail specified in *** sub-section (1) is in addition to the limitations under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force on granting of bail.
[Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is clarified that the expression "Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable" shall mean and shall be deemed to have always meant that all offences under this Act shall be cognizable offences and non-bailable offences notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), and accordingly the officers authorised under this Act are empowered to arrest an accused without warrant, subject to the fulfillment of conditions under section 19 and subject to the conditions enshrined under this section.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 45
-
Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Another
Whether in each and every case, even arising out of an offence under Penal Code, 1860 now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 would it be necessary to furnish grounds of arrest to an accused either before arrest or forthwith…
-
Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aditya Sarda
Matter pertains to the sustainability of orders passed by the High Court granting anticipatory bail to respondents accused of serious economic offences, and avoiding execution of summons or warrants, disobeying the…
-
The Union of India Through the Assistant Director v. Kanhaiya Prasad
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting bail to the respondent without considering the rigours of s.45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
-
Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr.
The main issue canvassed by the appellant in this appeal is the violation of the appellant’s right under Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India as the appellant was not informed of the grounds for his arrest.
-
Directorate of Enforcement v. Subhash Sharma
Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the respondent's arrest was illegal and thus, granting him bail for an offence under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
- Kshitij Ghildiyal v. Director General of Gst Intelligence Delhi
-
Partha Chatterjee v. Directorate of Enforcement
Matter pertains to grant of bail to the appellant-former State Education Minister and MLA, in the ED case for his involvement in various investigations, owing to the racket of illegal appointment of teachers.
- Abdul Muqeet v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Parvez Ahmed v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Mohd Ilyas v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Arvind Dham v. Union of India & Ors
- Tarun Kumar v. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
- Siddharth Kumar v. Enforecement Directorate
- Jawed Imam Siddiqui v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Vaibhav Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Pankaj Kumar Tiwari v. Enforcement Directorate
- Sehegal Hossain v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Vaibhav Jain v. Directorata of Enforcementre
- Ankush Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
-
V. Senthil Balaji v. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Matter pertains to grant of bail to former Tamil Nadu transport minister against whom complaint was filed for offence u/s.3 PMLA, which is punishable u/s.4 PMLA for his alleged involvement in the job racket scam.
- Amit Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Vishal Moral v. Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India Through Assistant Director & Anr
- Adnan Nisar v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Amandeep Singh Dhall v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Shivang Malkoti v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Arun Ramchandran Pillai v. Directorate Od Enforcement
- Sukanya Mondal v. Directorate of Enforcement
-
Abhishek Banerjee & Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement
Matter pertains to seeking quashing of the summons issued to the appellants by the Enforcement Directorate, seeking their personal appearance in New Delhi with the documents sought for, pertaining to the FIR registered…
- Chanpreet Singh Rayat v. Enforcement Directorate
- Pankaj Kumar v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Dheeraj Wadhawan v. CBI
- Narinder Palgotra v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
- Gurupada Maji v. Enforcement Directorate
-
Prem Prakash v. Union of India Through
When a person is in judicial custody/custody in another case investigated by the same Investigating Agency, whether the statements recorded (in the present case, the statements dated 03.08.2023, 04.08.2023, 11.08.2023)…
-
Kalvakuntla Kavitha v. Directorate of Enforcement
Matter pertains to the grant of the benefit of the proviso to s.45(1) of the PMLA to the applicant being a well educated and accomplished woman, who has remained Member of Parliament and a Member of Legislative Council.
-
Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement
Appellant was incarcerated for around 17 months, trial yet to commence. Bail denied. Whether the trial court and the High Court correctly considered the observations made by this Court with regard to right to speedy…
- Sunil Joshan v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
- Amit Arora v. Commissioner of Excise & Ors
- Jatin Rana v. The State of NCT Delhi Anr
- Mohd Enamul Haque Through His Pairokar Abdul Hannan v. Directorate of Enforcement Through Assistant Director
-
Parvinder Singh Khurana v. Directorate of Enforcement
The issue involved in these appeals concerns the power of the High Court or Sessions Court to grant an interim order of stay of operation of an order granting bail till the disposal of the application for cancellation…
- Shri Pradeep Koneru v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Kalvakuntla Kavitha v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Zeeshan Haider v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Manish Sisodia v. Central Bueraeu of Investigation
-
Tarsem Lal v. Directorate of Enforcement Jalandhar Zonal Office
(a) Whether the complaint filed u/s.44(1)(b) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 will be governed by sections 200 to 205 of the CrPC; (b) If the accused was not arrested by the ED till the filing of the…
- Sanjay Kansal v. Assistant Director, ED
- Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Rajeev Jhawar v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Directorate of Enforcement v. Amit Katyal
-
Satyendar Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
Whether the appellants have been able to satisfy the twin conditions laid down in s. 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the persons accused of the…
- Amanatullah Khan v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Sanjay Singh v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Dalip Jindal v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Mr Mahender Kumar Khandelwal v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Amit Aggarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Nitin Garg v. Union of India & Anr
-
Saumya Chaurasia v. Directorate of
Appellant aggrieved by the order of the High Court dismissing the bail application filed u/s.439 of Cr.P.C. has preferred this appeal. (i) Whether the appellant was prima facie found involved in the commission of the…
-
Pavana Dibbur v. The Directorate of
Whether the offence u/s.120B, IPC included in Paragraph 1 of the Schedule to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, can be treated as a scheduled offence even if the criminal conspiracy alleged is to commit an…
- Avtar Singh Kocchar @ Dolly v. Enforcement Directorate
-
Tarun Kumar v. Assistant Director Directorate
Appellant was arrested on the fourth supplementary complaint filed u/ss.44, 45, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in continuation of three complaints in the Complaint Case, for the commission of the offence of…
- Moloy Ghatak v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Amit Katyal v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Ashish Mittal v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Sameer Mahandru v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Directorate of Enforcement v. Sh. Dev Inder Bhalla
- Mr. Guangwen Kuang @ Andrew v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Manish Kothari (Presently in Jc) v. Director of Enforcement Ministry of Finanace Dept. of Revenue Headquarter Investigation Unit
- Ram Kishor Arora v. Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Mandhir Singh Todd v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Pooja Singh v. Directorate of Enforcement
- V. Senthil Balaji v. The State Represented by
- Suman Chadha v. Serious Fraud Insvestigation Office
- Tarun Kumar v. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
- Vijay Nair v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Abhishek Boinpally v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Benoy Babu v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Abhishek Boinpally v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Preeti Chandra v. Directorate of Enforcement
- P. Sarath Chandra Reddy v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Ashish Mittal v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
- Sanjay Raghunath Agarwal v. The Directorate of
- Satyendar Kumar Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Directorate of Enforcement v. Rahil Hiteshbhai Chovatia
- Ankush Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Vaibhav Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Kewal Krishan Kumar v. Enforcement Directorate
- Chandra Prakash Khandelwal v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Taranjeet Singh Bagga @ Sonu Singh v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office & Anr
- Chitra Ramkrishna v. Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate,
- M/S Prakash Industries Limited v. Union of India and Anr
- Prakash Thermal Power Limited v. Union of India & Anr
- Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Rohit Tandon v. The Enforcement Directorate