Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 · Chapter IV: Notification and Acquisition
Section 24: Land acquisition process under Act No. 1 of 1984 shall be deemed to have lapsed in certain cases
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, in any case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894,—
(a) where no award under section 11 of the said Land Acquisition Act has been made, then, all provisions of this Act relating to the determination of compensation shall apply; or
(b) where an award under said section 11 has been made, then such proceedings shall continue under the provisions of the said Land Acquisition Act, as if the said Act has not been repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), in case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), where an award under the said section 11 has been made five years or more prior to the commencement of this Act but the physical possession of the land has not been taken or the compensation has not been paid the said proceedings shall be deemed to have lapsed and the appropriate Government, if it so chooses, shall initiate the proceedings of such land acquisition afresh in accordance with the provisions of this Act:
Provided that where an award has been made and compensation in respect of a majority of land holdings has not been deposited in the account of the beneficiaries, then, all beneficiaries specified in the notification for acquisition under section 4 of the said Land Acquisition Act, shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
State amendments to this section
Andhra Pradesh
In the Principal Act, in section 24, in sub-section (2), —-
(1) in the existing proviso, for the expression where an award has been made the expression where the said award has been made 5 years or more prior to the commencement of this Act shall be substituted;
(2) after the existing proviso, the following proviso shall be added, namely:—
Provided further that in computing the period referred to in this sub-section, any period or periods during which the proceedings for acquisition of the land were held up on account of any order, stay, suspension or injunction issued by any Court or the period specified in the award of a Tribunal for taking possession or such period where possession has been taken but the compensation is lying deposited in a Court or in any designated account maintained for this purpose, shall be excluded.
[Vide Andhra Pradesh Act 22 of 2018, sec. 5 (w.e.f. 1-1-2014).]
Maharashtra
In section 24 of the principal Act, in sub-section (2), after the proviso, the following proviso shall be added, namely:—
Provided further that, in computing the period referred to in this sub-section, any period or periods during which the proceedings for acquisition of the land were held up on account of any stay or injunction issued by any court or the period specified in the award of a Tribunal for taking possession or such period where possession has been taken but the compensation is lying deposited in a court or in any designated account maintained for this purpose on account of refusal or not coming forward for receiving compensation despite receipt of such notice under sub-section (2) of section 12 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (I of 1894), shall be excluded. Also if the said land is mutated within three years after passing the award in the name of acquiring body, it shall be deemed that the possession of the land has been taken.
[Vide Maharashtra Act 37 of 2018, sec. 5 (26-4-2018).]
Haryana
In section 24 of the principal Act,-
(i) after sub-section (1), the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely:-
Explanation.-For the purpose of this sub-section, a land acquisition proceeding shall be deemed to have been initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894) where notification under section 4 of the said Act has been published in any form under sub-section (1) of the said section.
(ii) in sub-section (2),-
(a) the word physical shall be omitted;
(b) for the word “or” occurring after the words “possession of the land has not been taken”, the word “and” shall be substituted;
(c) in the proviso, for the sign “.”existing at the end, the sign “:” shall be substituted; and
(d) after the existing proviso, the following proviso shall be added at the end, namely:-
Provided further that in computing the period referred to in this sub-section, any period during which the proceedings for acquisition of the land were held up on account of any stay or injunction issued by order of any court, shall be excluded:
Provided further that the entry in rapat roznamcha regarding taking or handing over possession recorded by the Land Acquisition Officer or Revenue Official shall be treated as possession taken for all intents and purposes.
[Vide Haryana Act 21 of 2018, sec. 2 (9-5-2018).]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 24
-
Vishu Vardhan @ Vishnu Pradhan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Issue arose whether the impugned order having merged with this Court’s order in Reddy Veerana’s case, as claimed by R, renders the present appeal which lays a collateral challenge to an order of this Court itself not…
- M/S Annapoorna Industrial Corporation v. Lt. Governor NCT of Delhi & Anr
- M/S Aic Developers (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Lt. Governor NCT of Delhi & Anr
- M/S Amar Dyeing Works v. Lt. Governor NCT of Delhi & Anr
- M/S Rishyab Infratech Pvt. Ltd v. Lt. Governor NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Anil Jain v. Union of India and Ors
- M/S Shrishty Impex Private Limited v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
- Ravi Kumar v. Government of NCT & Ors
- Vivek Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
- Late Chanda Singh (Deceased) Through His Legal Heirs Shri Praveen Kumar and Ors v. Land Acquisition Collector and Ors
- Ritu Ansal v. Gnct of Delhi and Ors
- Shatabdi Builders & Promoters Pvt. Ltd v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors
- Snehi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors
-
M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. v. Mast Ram & Ors.
Whether the subject land and all other liabilities associated with it were transferred to the Appellant in terms of the Scheme; Whether it was the Appellant or JAL who was legally obliged to pay the compensation amount…
- Adarsh Kumar Handa v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors
-
Delhi Development Authority v. Tejpal & Ors.
Whether the appellants made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay on the grounds of subsequent change of law brought in by Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra [2018] 2 SCR 1 and Indore Development…
-
Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. v. M/s BSK Realtors LLP & Anr.
a) Whether the dismissal of a civil appeal preferred by one appellant in the first round operates as res judicata against the other appellant in the second round before this Court; b) Whether suppression of the first…
-
Department & Another v. M/s K.L. Rathi Steels Limited and Others
Issue arose to resolve as to which of the two views on maintainability of the Review petitions-Hon’ble Judge presiding over the Bench ruling in favour of maintainability of the review petitions whereas the Hon’ble…
- India Power Corporation Limited and Anr v. Ministry of Power Government of India and Anr
- Vinod Kumar Rajoria v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (Hsiidc) & Others v. M/S Honeywell International (India) Pvt. Ltd.
- National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors. v. Subhash Chander Khatri & Ors.
- Government of NCT of Delhi v. Vijay Gupta & Ors
- Dept. v. M/S. K.L. Rathi Steels Ltd.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Amit Jain & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Jagan Singh
- North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ram
- Rajan Sood & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
- Delhi Development Authority v. Rajesh Dua and
- Delhi Development Authority v. Shyamo & Ors.
- Government of NCT of Delhi v. Ratiram & Ors.
- Government of NCT of Delhiand Anr. v. Manjeet
- Delhi Development Authority v. Dewan Chand Pruthi & Ors
- Delhi Development Authority v. Beena Gupta (D)
- Delhi Development Authority v. Manpreet Singh & Ors
- Delhi Development Authority v. Eminent
- The State of Haryana & Ors. v. Sushila & Ors.
- Govt of NCT of Delhi Through Secretary, Land and Building Department and Anr v. Ram Prakash Sehrawat and Ors.
- Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Mohd. Maqbool & Ors
- Lucknow Development Authority v. Mehdi Hasan (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.
- Land Acquisition Collector (South East) v. Dharamvir and Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Raj Singh & Anr.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Dayanand & Ors.
- Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr. v. Sudesh Verma and Anr.
- Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr. v. Mohd. Zubair and Anr.
- Government of NCT of Delhi v. Subhash Jain and Ors.
- Land and Building Department Through Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. v. Mahipal Singh & Ors
- Government of NCT of Delhi v. Krishna Saini & Ors.
- Land Acquisition Collector (South), New Delhi and Anr. v. Suresh B. Kapur & Ors.
- Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr. v. Karampal and Anr.
- The Secretary, the Department of Land and Building and Ors. v. Anjeet Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. and Anr.
- Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr. v. Shiv Dutt Sharma and Anr.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Asha Jain & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Damini Wadhwa & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Krishan Lal Arora & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Bhagwat Singh & Ors.
- M/S Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Ltd & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr
- Union of India & Anr. v. Subhash Chander Sehgal & Ors.
- Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. v. Mr. Deepak Aggarwal & Ors.
- Rameshwar and Ors v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority, Faizabad v. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey & Ors.
- Agra Development Authority, Agra v. Anek Singh and Others
- Delhi Development Authority v. Sunil Khatri & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd and Ors.
- Delhi Administration Thr. Secretary, Land and Building Department & Ors. v. Pawan Kumar & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Rajan Sood & Ors.
- The Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Bangalore v. The State of Karnataka & Ors
- The Executive Engineer, Gosikhurd Project Ambadi, Bhandara, Maharashtra Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation v. Mahesh and Others
- Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.
- Union of India & Ors. v. Gopaldas Bhagwan Das & Ors.
- Jagjiwan Coop. Group Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. v. Lt. Governor, NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- Shah and S. Ravindra Bhat, Jj.] v. Manohar Lal & Ors. Etc.
- Shiv Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Virender Lal Bahri & Ors.
- Rameshwar & Others v. State of Haryana & Others
- Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. Tarun Pal Singh & Ors.
- The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Smt. Kallo Bai
- The Special Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Fruits and Vegetables v. N. Krishnappa and Others Etc.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Islamuddin & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Sukhbir Singh & Others
- Delhi Development Authority v. Kusham Jain and Another
- Aligarh Development Authority v. Megh Singh & Ors.
- Vijay Latka & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- Delhi Development Authority v. Reena Suri and Ors.
- Bangalore Development Authority v. N. Jayamma
- Rattan Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
- State of Haryana & Anr. v. Devander Sagar & Ors.
- M/S. Soorajmull Nagarmull v. State of Bihar & Ors.
- M.P. Steel Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise
- NCT of Delhi and Ors v. Jagjit Singh and Ors.
- M/S. Competent Automobiles Co. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
- M/S Magnum Promoters P. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors.