Trade Marks Act, 1999 · Chapter VII: Rectification and Correction of the Register
Section 57: Power to cancel or vary registration and to rectify the register
(1) On application made in the prescribed manner to the [High Court] or to the Registrar by any person aggrieved, the [Register or the High Court, as the case may be,] may make such order as it may think fit for cancelling or varying the registration of a trade mark on the ground of any contravention, or failure to observe a condition entered on the register in relation thereto.
(2) Any person aggrieved by the absence or omission from the register of any entry, or by any entry made in the register without sufficient cause, or by any entry wrongly remaining on the register, or by any error or defect in any entry in the register, may apply in the prescribed manner to the [High Court] or to the Registrar, and the [Register or the High Court, as the case may be,] may make such order for making, expunging or varying the entry as it may think fit.
(3) The [Register or the High Court, as the case may be,] may in any proceeding under this section decide any question that may be necessary or expedient to decide in connection with the rectification of the register.
(4) The [Register or the High Court, as the case may be,], of its own motion, may, after giving notice in the prescribed manner to the parties concerned and after giving them an opportunity of being heard, make any order referred to in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2).
(5) Any order of the [High Court] rectifying the register shall direct that notice of the rectification shall be served upon the Registrar in the prescribed manner who shall upon receipt of such notice rectify the register accordingly.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 57
- Mrs Arti Gupta & Anr v. Puran Rana & Anr
- Irvinder Kaur Chadha Supreme Agencie v. Garnish Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr
- Irvinder Kaur Chadha Supreme Agencie v. Garnish Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Anr
- Loreal India Pvt Ltd v. Rajesh Kumar Taneja Trading As Innovative Derma Care and Anr
- Amit Sood v. Roshan Portraits and Anr
- Mankind Pharma Ltd. 208, Okhla Industrial Estate Phase-Iii, New Delhi v. Gurinder Singh, 205, Cedar Ansal Township, Talaawali Chaanda, Indore-452010, MP
- Gsk Consumer Healthcare S.A v. Celebrity Biopharma Ltd. and Anr
- Gm Modular Pvt Ltd. 14/15, Bokadia Ind. Estate, Sativali Road, Vasai (East), Thane, Maharashtra v. Mayur Electromeck Pvt Ltd. 452, Functional Industrial Estate, Patparganj, Delhi
- Yashoda Hospital and Research Center Limited v. Yashoda Super Specialty Hospital and Anr
- Nnova and Company v. Ramesh Kumar Raheja and Anr
- Marie Stopes International v. Parivar Seva Sanstha and Anr
- Savita Oil Technologies Limited v. Valvoline Licensing and Intellectual Property Llc