- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 August 2026
- Bench
- Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 6203/2026
Judgment
O R D E R %
24.08.2026
¶1By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 01.07.2026 (hereinafter 'the impugned order') passed by the Addl. Session Judge-02, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter 'the Revisional Court').
¶2During the course of hearing, the Court finds that the order of taking cognizance is 02.08.2024, which has been passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), South West, Dwarka (hereinafter 'the CJM').
¶3It is against the order dated 02.08.2024, the respondent no.2 i.e. the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. accused had filed the revision petition, and, the Revisional Court had granted stay.
¶4Thereafter, an application for vacation of stay was filed by the petitioner, which has been rejected by the Revisional Court vide the impugned order.
¶5Various submissions have been made by learned counsel appearing for the parties.
¶6The Court, however, finds that the order dated 02.08.2024, which is the subject matter of the revision petition is unsustainable in view of it being bereft of any reason. The order dated 02.08.2024 is extracted as under: "Matter is at the stage of consideration. Charge-sheet perused. Submissions of Ld. APP for the State heard. On the basis of material on record, there is material to show prima-facie commission of alleged offences by the accused. I take cognizance of offences under Sections 420/406/467/468/471/120B IPC. Accused is stated to be on court bail. IO submits that further investigation is being carried out in this matter and supplementary charge-sheet shall be filed w.r.t. the same. Issue summons to the accused through IO/SHO for NDOH. Put up for further proceedings on 18.10.2024."
¶7Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2-accused submits that it is the aforesaid order which is under challenge in revision.
¶8Having considered the overall controversy, the Court finds that the order of taking cognizance and summoning dated 02.08.2024 deserves to be set aside, and is, accordingly, set aside.
¶9Consequently, the revision petition pending before the Revisional Court against the said order will also have to be disposed of.
¶10The parties, however, are relegated to the Court of the CJM, where, the parties will have to appear before the CJM who shall pass a fresh order The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. on the basis of the available material and in accordance with law.
¶11All rights and contentions of the parties are left open.
¶12The concerned Court shall decide the issue of taking cognizance with due expedition.
¶13With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J AUGUST 24, 2026 aks The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010394632026 + CRL.M.C. 6203/2026 M/S CONCEPT HORIZON INFRA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Adit Pujari and Mr. Thakur Ankit Singh, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Asim, Mr. Aditya Varun and Mr. Raymon Singh, Advocates for respondent no.2. SI Praveen, PS EoW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.