VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Anup Kumar Biswanath Jindal v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
24 August 2026
Bench
Prateek Jalanauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 3490/2026

Judgment

O R D E R %

24.08.2026

¶1By way of this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 127/2020, dated 11.09.2020, registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Delhi, under Sections 406/420/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶2After some arguments, Ms. Charu Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the petitioner before the Sessions Court.

¶3The bail application, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed This is a digitally signed order. BAIL APPLN. 3490/2026 as withdrawn in view of the aforesaid submission.

¶4It is made clear that this Court has made no observations on the merits of the matter and all rights and contentions of the parties are left open in accordance with law before the Trial Court. PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 24, 2026 "B"/MK/ This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

BAIL APPLN. 3490/2026 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010395032026 + BAIL APPLN. 3490/2026, CRL.M.As. 25958-59/2026, & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1605/2026 ANUP KUMAR BISWANATH JINDAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Charu Mathur, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarnag Srivastav, APP. Insp. Jasveer Singh, PS-EoW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.