- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2024
- Bench
- Subramonium Prasad
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 1188/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Subramonium Prasad
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2024
¶1The Petitioner has approached this Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
¶2It is stated that the Petitioner and Respondents executed the Finance Agreement bearing reference no. A8455681 for a loan amount of Rs.1,46,85,000/- on 25.07.2017. It is stated that on 08.10.2021, Respondent No.1 through its directors approached the Petitioner for restructuring of the loan facility and a Restructuring Agreement was executed between the parties.
¶3It is stated that since the Respondent defaulted in repayment under the Restructuring Agreement, a legal notice dated 07.12.2023 was issued by the Petitioner for termination of the loan facility and invoking Arbitration. It is stated that Clause 16 of the Restructuring Agreement provides for settlement of the disputes by way of Arbitration and the place of arbitration shall be This is a digitally signed order. New Delhi.
¶4Accordingly, Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. (Mob. No.9810254016) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.
¶5The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and would abide by its rules and regulations. The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
¶6The learned Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the 1996 Act within a week of entering on reference.
¶7In the meantime, it is always open for the parties to settle the disputes.
¶8All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims, question regarding jurisdiction, arbitrability of the dispute on the ground of fraud etc. are kept open, to be decided by the learned Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.
¶9Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the contentions of the parties and the order that is being passed is confined to appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act.
¶10The present petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending application(s), if any.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024 hsk This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1188/2024 SIEMENS FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asav Rajan, Ms. Charu Trivedi, Mr. Devang Shrotriya, Mr. Kashish Chadha, Advocates. versus JAUHARI PRINTERS PVT. LTD & ORS ......Respondents Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma and Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.