Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 · Chapter III
Section 11: Appointment of arbitrators
(1) A person of any nationality may be an arbitrator, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
(2) Subject to sub-section (6), the parties are free to agree on a procedure for appointing the arbitrator or arbitrators.
(3) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), in an arbitration with three arbitrators, each party shall appoint one arbitrator, and the two appointed arbitrators shall appoint the third arbitrator who shall act as the presiding arbitrator.
(4) If the appointment procedure in sub-section (3) applies and—
(a) a party fails to appoint an arbitrator within thirty days from the receipt of a request to do so from the other party; or
(b) the two appointed arbitrators fail to agree on the third arbitrator within thirty days from the date of their appointment,
the appointment shall be made, upon request of a party, by [the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or any person or institution designated by such Court];
(5) Failing any agreement referred to in sub-section (2), in an arbitration with a sole arbitrator, if the parties fail to agree on the arbitrator within thirty days from receipt of a request by one party from the other party to so agree the appointment shall be made, upon request of a party, by [the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or any person or institution designated by such Court].
(6) Where, under an appointment procedure agreed upon by the parties,—
(a) a party fails to act as required under that procedure; or
(b) the parties, or the two appointed arbitrators, fail to reach an agreement expected of them under that procedure; or
(c) a person, including an institution, fails to perform any function entrusted to him or it under that procedure,
a party may request [the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or any person or institution designated by such Court] to take the necessary measure, unless the agreement on the appointment procedure provides other means for securing the appointment.
[(6A) The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court, while considering any application under sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6), shall, notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any Court, confine to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement.
(6B) The designation of any person or institution by the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court, for the purposes of this section shall not be regarded as a delegation of judicial power by the Supreme Court or the High Court.]
(7) A decision on a matter entrusted by sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) to [the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or the person or institution designated by such Court is final and no appeal including Letters Patent Appeal shall lie against such decision].
4 (8) The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or the person or institution designated by such Court, before appointing an arbitrator, shall seek a disclosure in writing from the prospective arbitrator in terms of sub-section (1) of section 12, and have due regard to—
(a) any qualifications required for the arbitrator by the agreement of the parties; and
(b) the contents of the disclosure and other considerations as are likely to secure the appointment of an independent and impartial arbitrator.]
(9) In the case of appointment of sole or third arbitrator in an international commercial arbitration, [the Supreme Court or the person or institution designated by that Court] may appoint an arbitrator of a nationality other than the nationalities of the parties where the parties belong to different nationalities.
[(10) The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court, may make such scheme as the said Court may deem appropriate for dealing with matters entrusted by sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6), to it.]
(11) Where more than one request has been made under sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) or sub-section (6) to the Chief Justices of different High Courts or their designates, [different High Courts or their designates, the High Court or its designate to whom the request has been first made] under the relevant sub-section shall alone be competent to decide on the request.
[(12) (a) Where the matters referred to in sub-sections (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) and sub-section (10) arise in an international commercial arbitration, the reference to the "Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court" in those sub-sections shall be construed as a reference to the "Supreme Court"; and
(b) Where the matters referred to in sub-sections (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) and sub-section (10) arise in any other arbitration, the reference to the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court in those sub-sections shall be construed as a reference to the "High Court" within whose local limits the principal Civil Court referred to in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 2 is situate, and where the High Court itself is the Court referred to in that clause, to that High Court.]
[(13) An application made under this section for appointment of an arbitrator or arbitrators shall be disposed of by the Supreme Court or the High Court or the person or institution designated by such Court, as the case may be, as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to dispose of the matter within a period of sixty days from the date of service of notice on the opposite party.
(14) For the purpose of determination of the fees of the arbitral tribunal and the manner of its payment to the arbitral tribunal, the High Court may frame such rules as may be necessary, after taking into consideration the rates specified in the Fourth Schedule.
Explanation.— For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that this sub-section shall not apply to international commercial arbitration and in arbitrations (other than international commercial arbitration) in case where parties have agreed for determination of fees as per the rules of an arbitral institution.]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 16 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 11
-
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Bcl Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd.
Issue arose whether the High Court, was justified in referring the parties to arbitration by allowing the petition u/s.11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
-
M/S Alchemist Hospitals Ltd. v. M/S Ict Health Technology Services India Pvt. Ltd.
Whether Clause 8.28 of the Agreement can be considered to be a valid arbitration agreement under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
-
Kamal Gupta & Anr. v. M/s L.R Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Etc.
Whether it is permissible for a non-signatory to an agreement leading to arbitration proceedings to remain present in such arbitration proceedings; after appointment of an arbitrator u/s.11(6), Arbitration and…
-
Supply Corporation Limited & Anr. v. Sanjay Kumar
Whether the dispute between the respondents and the appellant arising out of the agreement incorporating the arbitration clause has become non-arbitrable in view of the initiation and pendency of the criminal cases;…
-
Development Authority v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers
The core issue in the present matter revolves around determining the appropriate forum for the adjudication of disputes arising out of the Concession Agreement dated 05.01.2012 entered into between the appellant and…
-
BGM and M-RPL-JMCT (JV) v. Eastern Coalfields Limited
(i) Whether the question of existence of an arbitration agreement should be left for the arbitral tribunal to decide; (ii) whether clause 13 of the General Terms and Conditions of the contract and relied upon by the…
-
Authority & Anr v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers & Contractors
1. Whether an arbitral award rendered under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter “Act, 1996”), where the arbitration proceedings ought to have been governed by the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran…
-
Office for Alternative Architecture v. Ircon Infrastructure and Services Ltd.
Whether while exercising power u/s.11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court has to confine its consideration as to the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties; If so, whether it…
-
Arabian Exports Private Limited v. National Insurance Company Ltd.
Whether a dispute raised by an insured after giving a full and final discharge voucher to the insurer can be referred to arbitration.
-
INSC 1066 and SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning,
Whether an arbitral tribunal has the authority or power to implead or join a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement as a party to the arbitration proceedings.
-
Rajan Chadha & Anr. v. Sanjay Arora
When one Judge of the same Court has taken a particular view holding the respondent to be guilty of contempt, whether another Judge could have come to a finding that the respondent was not guilty of contempt.
-
Adavya Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Vishal Structurals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Whether service of a Section 21 notice and joinder in a Section 11 application are prerequisites to implead a person/entity as a party to the arbitral proceedings; What is the source of jurisdiction of an arbitral…
-
M/s Citicorp Finance (India) Limited v. Snehasis Nanda
Whether on facts, the complainant-respondent would come under the definition of ‘consumer’ in terms of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; whether any liability rested on the appellant to disburse the entire amount of…
-
Disortho S.A.S. v. Meril Life Sciences Private Limited
Law governing the arbitration agreement in the present case.
-
State of Uttar Pradesh and Another v. R.K. Pandey and Another
Matter pertains to the enforceability of the ex-parte awards against the employer-State Government and the principal of the medical college, when the employer objected the authenticity of the arbitration agreement…
-
Dushyant Janbandhu v. M/s Hyundai Autoever India Pvt. Ltd.
High Court allowing the petition filed by the respondent under Section 11(6) under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointed an arbitrator. Whether the disputes relating to non-payment of wages and the…
-
M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. M/s Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad
(i) Whether a fresh application u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent could be said to be maintainable more particularly when no liberty to file a fresh application was granted…
-
Goqii Technologies Private Limited v. Sokrati Technologies Private Limited
Issue arose, as to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the appellant’s application u/s.11 of the Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes and claims in terms of…
-
M/S Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. M/S Micromax Informatics Fze
(a) Whether the present petition under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 maintainable in India; (b) whether seat of arbitration designated under the aforesaid Distributorship Agreement is in…
-
Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmukh v. Asap Fluids Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Petitioner sought appointment of an arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes and claims in terms of the Shareholders Agreement between the parties. Whether the reference under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration &…
-
Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr. v. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant, which is a statutory body under the Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 and Respondent, a company, entered into a lease agreement for leasing storage space for a period of three years. Clause 16 of the…
-
Ajay Madhusudan Patel & Ors. v. Jyotrindra S. Patel & Ors.
What is the scope of jurisdiction of the referral court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Whether in the instant case, on a prima facie view, the SRG Group being a non-signatory to the…
-
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited
Whether an application for extension of time under Section 29A, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be filed after the expiry of the period for making of the arbitral award.
-
Cox & Kings Ltd. v. Sap India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Whether the application of the petitioner for the appointment of an arbitrator deserves to be allowed. Whether the requirement of prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, as stipulated u/s. 11 of the Act,…
-
SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning
Issue arose whether the execution of a discharge voucher towards the full and final settlement between the parties would operate as a bar to invoke arbitration; as regards the scope and standard of judicial scrutiny…
-
Elfit Arabia & Anr. v. Concept Hotel BARONS Limited & Ors.
Whether claims of the petitioner in the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were barred by limitation.
-
Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited v. Samir Narain Bhojwani
In the instant case, issue revolves around the power of the Appellate Court dealing with the appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to pass an order of remand to Section 34 Court.
-
NBCC (India) Limited v. Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
When there is a general reference in the second contract to the terms and conditions of the first contract, whether the arbitration clause in the first contract would ipso facto be applicable to the second contract.
-
M/S Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. M/S Aptech Ltd.
Whether the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to an application for appointment of arbitrator u/s.11(6), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; if yes, whether the present petition is barred by limitation; when does…
-
Sushma Shivkumar Daga & Anr. v. Madhurkumar
The trial Court referred the matter to arbitration and the said decision was upheld by the High Court. Whethe r the Trial Court and the High Court have rightly referred the ma tter to arbitration or the dispute is of…
-
N N Global Mercantile (P) Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. (2023) 7
The issue at hand arose in the context of three statutes; the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Stamp Act imposes duty on “instruments”.…
-
Lombardi Engineering Ltd. v. Uttarakhand Jal
Whether the dictum as laid down in ICOMM Tele Limited’s case can be made applicable to the instant case, when Clause 55 of the General Conditions of Contract provides for a pre-deposit of 7% of the total claim for the…
-
Smt. M. Hemalatha Devi & Ors. v. B. Udayasri
Whether the dispute between the parties is arbitrable, and once a party has availed the remedy before a public forum under a special beneficial legislation, can it be compelled to go for arbitration.
- M/S Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd. v. Union of India
- M/S B and T Ag v. Ministry of Defence
- M/S. Shree Vishnu Constructions v. The Engineer in
- M/s N. N. GLOBAL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/s
- Ntpc Ltd. v. M/S Spml Infra Ltd.
- Union of India & Ors. v. M/S. Bharat Enterprise
- Shinhan Bank v. Carol Info Services Limited
- M/S. Meenakshi Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Abhyudaya Green Economic Zones Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- M/S Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata Aig General Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
- Weatherford Oil Tool Middle East Limited v. Baker Hughes Singapore Pte
- M/S. Emaar India Ltd. v. Tarun Aggarwal Projects Llp & Anr.
- Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd v. Afcons Gunanusa Jv
- Brij Raj Oberoi v. The Secretary, Tourism and Civil Aviation Department & Anr.
- Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd & Anr v. M/S Ivrcl Amr Joint Venture
- General Manager East Coast Railway Rail Sadan & Anr. v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Ncc Limited
- Swadesh Kumar Agarwal v. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal & Ors, Etc., Etc.
- New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Limited
- M/S Ravi Ranjan Developers Pvt. Ltd v. Aditya Kumar Chatterjee
- Intercontinental Hotels Group (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Waterline Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
- Ellora Paper Mills Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- State of Haryana v. M/S. Shiv Shankar Construction Co. & Anr.
- Garg Builders v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
- Dlf Home Developers Limited v. Rajapura Homes Private Limited & Anr.
- Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited & Ors. v. M/S Ajay Sales & Suppliers
- M/S. Silpi Industries Etc. v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. Etc.
- M/S. Inox Renewables Ltd. v. Jayesh Electricals Ltd.
- Sanjiv Prakash v. Seema Kukreja and Ors.
- Indus Biotech Private Limited v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund (Earlier Known As Kotak India Venture Limited) & Ors.
- Chief General Manager (Ipc) MP Power Trading Co Ltd & Anr. v. Narmada Equipments Pvt Ltd
- Secunderabad Cantonment Board v. M/S B. Ramachandraiah & Sons
- Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd.
- Pravin Electricals Pvt. Ltd. v. Galaxy Infra and Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
- Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravindranath Rao Sindhia & Anr.
- Hydroelectric Project Authority, Bhutan v. Larsen & Toubro Ltd.
- Gr Green Life Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. Leitwind Shriram Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd.
- Suresh Shah v. Hipad Technology India Private Limited
- Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation
- Mankastu Impex Private Limited v. Airvisual Limited
- G H Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. M/S Eci-Spic-Smo-Mcml (Jv)Joint Venture Company
- Hindustan Zinc Limited (H.Z.L.) v. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
- M/S. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited v. Northern Coal Field Limited
- M/S. Ssppl and M/S. Ail Was v. Salma Dam Joint Venture & Anr.
- Union of India v. Pradeep Vinod Construction Company
- The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. Dicitex Furnishing Ltd.
- M/S Mayavti Trading Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradyuat Deb Burman
- Rashid Raza v. Sadaf Akhtar
- M/S Geo Miller & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Chairman, Rajasthan Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd.
- National Highways Authorityof v. Sayedabad Tea Company Ltd. and Ors.
- Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr. v. Subhtex India Ltd. & Ors.
- River Pellets Limited v. Kamachi Industries Limited
- G H Pam Developments Private Ltd. v. State of West Bengal
- Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Reynders Label Printing India Private Limited and Anr.
- Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.
- Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Antique Art Exports Pvt. Ltd.
- Vidya Drolia & Ors. v. Durga Trading Corporation
- Giriraj Garg v. Coal India Ltd. & Ors.
- M/S. Emaar Mgf Land Limited v. Aftab Singh
- Sp Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Another
- South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Sms Aamw Tollways Private Ltd.
- M/S Larsen and Toubro Limited Scomi Engineering Bhd v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
- M/S Trans Asian Shipping Services (Pvt.) Ltd. v. M/S Beacon Shipping Lines Ltd. Represented by Mr. Mohammed S. Aslam Managing Director & Others
- M/S. Zhejiang Bonly Elevator Guide Rail Manufacture Co. Ltd. v. M/S. Jade Elevator Components
- Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. M/S. Narbheram Power and Steel Pvt. Ltd.
- Cheran Properties Limited v. Kasturi and Sons Limited and Ors.
- Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Developmentauthority and Anr. v. Backbone Enterprises Limited and Anr.