- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 18 November 2025
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 4074/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
18.11.2025
¶1A Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners for quashing of Summoning Order dated 07.03.2017 under Section 406/420/506/120B IPC in Complaint No.8654/2016 titled 'Archana Mittal vs. Logix Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd.'
¶2The matter has been compounded between Authorized Representative of Petitioner No.1 Mr. Akshay Tripathi and the Complainant Archana Mittal through Attorney holder Mr. Sanjay Mittal/husband of the Complainant. The parties endorse all the terms of the Settlement. It is stated that they have amicably entered into the Settlement without any pressure, force or coercion and undertake to be bound by the terms of the Settlement. This is a digitally signed order. 3. Sh. Sanjay Mittal on behalf of the Complainant states that in terms of the Settlement, the entire Complaint against the Company as well as all other accused who are the Directors, Representatives of the Petitioner No.1 Company may be quashed.
¶4In view of the Settlement which is filed in the Court today, be taken on record, the Complaint Case No. 8654/2016 titled 'Archana Mittal vs. Logix Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd.' along with the subsequent proceedings emanating there from are hereby quashed.
¶5As submitted in the terms of the Settlement, the amount deposited with the Registrar General of this Court by the Petitioners vide FDR No.15530310804193 dated 14.11.2017 may be released to the Petitioner No.1, in accordance with rules.
¶6Learned counsel on behalf of the Petitioners submits that the matter before the Consumer Forum has been fixed for final orders for 25.11.2025. It is submitted that the Application along with the Settlement shall be placed before the Consumer Forum within three days.
¶7The Petition is accordingly disposed of along with the pending Application(s).
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025 va This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4074/2017, CRL.M.A. 21056/2021 & CRL.M.A. 32316/2024 LOGIX INFRABUILD PVT LTD & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vijay Kaundal, Mr. Nitish Kant Sharma and Ms. Sapna Jha, Advocates. versus GOVT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State. Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Mr. Anubhav Garg, Mr. Yash Raj Mehran, Ms Jyotsana Vyas, Ms Anushka Sharma, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.